Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:01:20.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of a submaintenance diet on the composition of the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. W. Pomeroy
R. W. Pomeroy
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Five inbred Large Whites from the same strain as used by McMeekan (1940) were reared on a High Plane of nutrition to approximately 330 lb. live weight at which one was killed as a control. The rest were put on to a submaintenance diet of straw and water and killed successively at roughly equal intervals in live weight between 330 and 200 lb. The weights of blood, organs and offals were determined and the carcasses were jointed and completely dissected into their constituent tissues. The total weights of each and the weights within the various joints were recorded.

(1) Organs. The early-maturing organs, brain, eyes, etc., continued to grow. Other organs like the heart, liver, lungs, etc., suffered a greater or less degree of atrophy which was probably determined by a suspension of their functions.

(2) Carcass composition. The tissues of the carcass were affected in reverse order to their development, i.e. fat most, muscle less and bone least. Bone continued to grow in the earlier stages of submaintenance.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1941 , pp. 50 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addis, T., Poo, L. J. & Lew, W. (1936). J. biol. Chem. 115, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidder, F. & Schmidt, C. (1852). Die Verdauungssafte. u. der Stoffwechsel. Mittau. u. Lpz., 413.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. (1870). Étude de physiologie expérimentale de la mort par inanition. Thèse No. 186, Paris.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1935). Rep. Food Invest. Bd. Part 3.Google Scholar
Falck, F. A. (1875). Beitr. Physiol. Hyg. Pharmak. Toxikol. 1, 128.Google Scholar
Falok, F. A. & Scheffer, T. (1854). Arch, physiol. Heilk. 13, 508.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hilditch, T. P. & Pedelty, W. H. (1939). Biochem. J. 34, 40–7.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1915). Amer. J. Anal. 18, 75.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1925). Inanition and Malnutrition. London.Google Scholar
Lukianow, S. M. (1892). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 16, 87.Google Scholar
Manassein, W. (1869). Russ. med. dissert. St. Petersburg, cited by , Jackson (1925).Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 511.Google Scholar
Pálsson, H. (1939). J. agric. Sci. 29, 544–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C. A. (1918). J. exp. Zool. 25, 301.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, P. F., Moulton, C. R. & Haigh, L. D. (1918). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 28.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, P. F., Moulton, C. R. & Haigh, L. D. (1922). Biederm. Zbl. 51, 192.Google Scholar
Voit, C. (1866). Z. Biol. 2, 308.Google Scholar
Voit, C. (1894). Z. Biol. 30, 510.Google Scholar