Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:15:51.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of aerobic rice cultivation using drip systems with conventional flooding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2021

Y. Bozkurt Çolak Open the ORCID record for Y. Bozkurt Çolak [Opens in a new window]
Y. Bozkurt Çolak*
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Resources Research Unit, Alata Horticultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 23, 33400, Tarsus-Mersin, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Y. Bozkurt Çolak, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, yield and water productivity response of rice to various irrigation levels applied with subsurface and surface drip systems in 2019 and 2020 in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey was evaluated in comparison with conventional flooding (CF). The treatments consisted of two irrigation methods namely surface drip (DI) and subsurface drip systems (SDI), three irrigation levels designated as plant pan coefficients (I1.00: Evaporation from Class A pan (Ep) × 1.00; I1.25: Ep × 1.25 and I1.50: Ep × 1.50) and CF as control. The effects of drip systems and coefficients on yield and yield components were statistically significant (P < 0.01). DI produced higher yield than SDI. CF produced significantly greater yield than both DI and SDI systems. With two drip systems, average water savings of 60.5% in I1.00, 54.5% in I1.25 and 49% in I1.50 were achieved as compared to CF. However, yield reductions of 15% in I1.50, 20% in I1.25, 29% in I1.00 were observed for DI; corresponding values for SDI were 20, 28 and 44%, respectively. Drip irrigation in aerobic rice production system had almost twice the water productivity based on total irrigation water applied (WPI) or total water input (irrigation + rainfall) (WPI+P) compared with CF. During the study years, the highest WPI and WPI+P values were found in DI-I1.00 (0.81–0.73 kg/m3) and (0.85 and 0.74 kg/m3), respectively. In conclusion, DI-I1.50 treatment is recommended for sustainable aerobic rice production since DI-I1.50 resulted in water saving of 49% but yield decrease of 15% as compared to CF.

Keywords

Paddywater productivitywater savingyield attributes
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 159 , Issue 7-8 , September 2021 , pp. 544 - 556
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adekoya, MA, Liu, Z, Vered, E, Zhou, L, Kong, D and Qin, J (2014) Agronomic and ecological evaluation on growing water-saving and drought-resistant rice (Oryza sativa L. through drip irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alou, IN, Steyn, JM, Annandale, JG and van der Laan, M (2018) Growth, phenological, and yield response of upland rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nerica 4®) to water stress during different growth stages. Agricultural Water Management 198, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, F, Dingkuhn, M, Sow, A and Audebert, A (2005) Drought-induced changes in rooting patterns and assimilate partitioning between root and shoot in upland rice. Field Crops Research 93, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz, O, Bin, L, Imtiaz, M, Chen, J, He, Y, Lin, L, Ali, S, Riaz, M, Mehmood, S, Rizwan, M and Lu, G (2018) Irrigation methods affect water productivity, grain yield, and growth responses of rice at different levels of nitrogen. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 73, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babu, RC, Nguyen, BD, Cahamarerk, V, Shanmugasundaram, P, Chezhian, P, Jeyaprakash, P, Ganesh, SK, Palchamy, A, Sadasivam, S, Sarkarung, S, Wade, LJ and Nguyen, HT (2003) Genetic analysis of drought resistance in rice by molecular markers: association between secondary traits and field performance. Crop Science 43, 1457–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belder, P, Bouman, BAM, Spiertz, JHJ, Peng, S, Castaneda, AR and Visperas, RM (2005) Crop performance, nitrogen and water use in flooded and aerobic rice. Plant and Soil 273, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, P, Neogi, S, Roy, KS and Mohapatra, T (2014) Tropical low land rice ecosystem is a net carbon sink. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 189, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borojeni, BH and Salehi, F (2013) Effect of continuous and intermittent irrigation methods on rice (cv. Koohrang) yield. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59, 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, BAM and Tuong, TP (2001) Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated rice. Agricultural Water Management 49, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, BAM, Peng, S, Castaneda, AR and Visperas, RM (2005) Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agricultural Water Management 74, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, BAM, Xiaoguang, Y, Huaq, W, Zhimin, W, Junfang, Z and Bin, C (2006) Performance of aerobic rice varieties under irrigated conditions in North China. Field Crops Research 97, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, BAM, Feng, L, Tuong, TP, Lu, G, Wang, H and Feng, Y (2007) Exploring options to grow rice under watershort conditions in northern China using a modelling approach. II. Quantifying yield, water balance components, and water productivity. Agricultural Water Management 88, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozkurt Çolak, Y, Yazar, A, Gönen, E and Eroğlu, EÇ (2018) Yield and quality response of surface and subsurface drip irrigated eggplant and comparison of net returns. Agricultural Water Management 206, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çakır, R (2020) Assessments on water productivity of rice crop under application of various irrigation techniques. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 7, 25–35.Google Scholar
Castaneda, AR, Bouman, BAM, Peng, S and Visperas, RM (2002) The potential of aerobic rice to reduce water use in water-scarce irrigated lowlands in the tropics. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Water-wise Rice Production, 8–11 April 2002, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 165–176. ISBN 971-22-0182-1.Google Scholar
Chapagain, T, Riseman, A and Yamaji, E (2011) Achieving more with less water: alternate wet and dry irrigation (AWDI) as an alternative to the conventional water management practices in rice farming. Journal of Agricultural Science 3, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, CM (1962) In search of yield. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural. Sciences 28, 171–178.Google Scholar
Evett, SR, Stone, KC, Schwartz, RC, O'Shaughnessy, SA, Colaizzi, PD, Anderson, SK and Anderson, DJ (2019) Resolving discrepancies between laboratory-determined field capacity values and field water content observations: implications for irrigation management. Irrigation Science 37, 751–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT (2019) Crop Production Statistics. Rome: Statistics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Farooq, M, Kobayashi, N, Wahid, A, Ito, O and Basra, SMA (2009) Strategies for producing more rice with less water. Advances in Agronomy 101, 351–388.Google Scholar
Gana, AS (2011) Screening and resistance of tradition and improved cultivars of rice to drought stress at Badeggi, Niger state, Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2, 1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) (2002) Rice today. International Rice Congress, Beijing, China. 16–20 September 2002. Published by IRRI, Phillippines, 1, 31p.Google Scholar
Jayapalreddy, R and Shenoy, NS (2013) A comparative economic analysis of traditional and system of rice intensification (SRI) rice cultivation practices in Mahabubnagar district of Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3, 1–3.Google Scholar
Kadiyala, MD, Mylavarapu, MRS, Li, YC, Reddy, GB and Reddy, MD (2012) Impact of aerobic rice cultivation on growth, yield, and water productivity of rice–maize rotation in semiarid tropics. Agronomy Journal 104, 1757–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamoshita, A, Babu, RC, Bhupathi, NM and Fukai, S (2008) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crops Research 109, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y and Katsura, K (2014) Rice adaptation to aerobic soils: physiological considerations and implications for agronomy. Plant Production Science 17, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kıral, T, Kasnakoğlu, H, Tatlidil, FF, Fidan, H and Gündoğmuş, E (1999) Calculation Methodology for Agricultural Crops and Data Base (Project Report 1999-13). Publication No: 37. Ministry of Agriculture, Ankara, Turkey (Turkish).Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Dixit, S, Ram, T, Yadaw, RB, Mishra, KK and Mandal, NP (2014) Breeding high-yielding drought tolerance rice: genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 6265–6278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Lopez, R, Jimenez-Chong, JA, Hernandez-Aragon, L and Ibarra, MAI (2018) Water productivity of rice genotypes with irrigation and drainage. Irrigation and Drainage 67, 508–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Materu, ST, Shukla, S, Sishodia, RP, Tarimo, A and Tumbo, SD (2018) Water use and rice productivity for irrigation management alternatives in Tanzania. Water 10, 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, N, Ozawa, K and Mochizuki, T (2010) Physiological and morphological traits related to water use by three rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes grown under aerobic rice systems. Plant and Soil 335, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mdemu, MV and Francis, T (2013) Productivity of water in large rice (paddy) irrigation schemes in the upper catchment of Great Ruaha River Basin, Tanzania. In chapter 6. In Wurbs, R. (ed). Productivity of Water in Large Rice (Paddy) Irrigation Schemes in Water Resources Planning, Development and Management. London UK: IntechOpen, vol. 117, pp. 117–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/52471.Google Scholar
MGM (2019) General Directorate of Meteorology of Turkey. Climate data. Ankara, Turkey: MGM.Google Scholar
Mostafa, HMS and Fujimoto, N (2014) Water saving scenarios for effective irrigation management in Egyptian rice cultivation. Ecological Engineering 70, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, SK, Duraisamy, VK, Thiyagarajan, G and Manikandan, M (2020) Evaluation of drip fertigation system for aerobic rice in western zone of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 32, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nay-Htoon, B (2016) Water use efficiency of rainfed and paddy rice ecosystem: disentangling agronomic and ecosystem water use of rice. Dissertation to attain the academic degree of Doctor of Natural Science (Dr rer. nat.) of the Bayreuth Graduate School for Mathematical and Natural Sciences of the University of Bayreuth. Thesis, p. 161.Google Scholar
Nie, L, Peng, S, Chen, M, Shah, F, Huang, JK, Cui, K and Xiang, J (2012) Aerobic rice for water-saving agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, K, Kondo, M, Ando, H and Kakuda, K (2002) Water uptake under water stress at panicle initiation stage in upland rice as affected by previous soil water regimes. Soil Science Plant Nutrient 48, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanog, AD, Swamy Mallikarjuna, BP, Shamsudin, NAA, Dixit, S, Hernandez, JE, Boromea, TH, Sta. Cruz, PC and Kumar, A (2014) Grain yield QTLs with consistent-effect under reproductive-stage drought stress in rice. Field Crops Research 161, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parthasarathi, T, Vanitha, K, Mohandass, S and Vered, E (2013) Effect of drip irrigation systems on yield of aerobic rice. Environment & Ecology 31, 1826–1829.Google Scholar
Parthasarathi, T, Vanitha, K, Mohandass, S and Vered, E (2018) Evaluation of drip irrigation system for water productivity and yield of rice. Agronomy Journal 110, 2378–2389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S, Khush, GS, Virk, P, Tang, Q and Zou, Y (2008) Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research 108, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, NL, Bing, S, Chen, MX, Shah, F, Huang, JL, Cui, KH and Jing, X (2012) Aerobic rice for water-saving agriculture – a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 411–418.Google Scholar
Rahman, MT, Islam, MT and Islam, MO (2002) Effect of water stress at different growth stages on yield and yield contributing characters of transplanted Aman rice. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 5, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SGB (2020) Agricultural Economy and Policy Development Institute. Agricultural Products Markets Paddy. Available at https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/tepge.Google Scholar
Singh, PK, Srivastava, PC, Sangavi, R, Gunjan, P and Sharma, V (2019) Rice water management under drip irrigation: an effective option for high water productivity and efficient zinc applicability. Pantnagar Journal of Research 17, 19–26.Google Scholar
Steel, RGD and Torrie, JH (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd Edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Suriyan, C, Suravoot, Y and Kanyaratt, S (2010) Water deficit stress in the reproductive stage of four indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 3387–3398.Google Scholar
Susi, HSD, Marasi, AA and Soekrasno, DJ (2010) Intermittent irrigation in system of rice intensification potential as an adaptation and mitigation option of negative impacts of rice cultivation in irrigated paddy field. Available at www.rid.go.th//2.10-Susi_HDewi_AA-Marasi_DJ-Soekrasno.pdf.Google Scholar
Tuong, TP and Bouman, BAM (2003) Rice production in water scarce environments. In Kijne, JW, Barker, R and Molden, D (eds), Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuong, TP, Bouman, B and Mortimer, M (2005) More rice, less water: integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia. Plant Production Science 8, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wopereis, MCS, Bouman, BAM, Tuong, TP, Ten Berge, HFM and Kropff, MJ (1996) Oryza_W: rice growth model for irrigated and rainfed environments. SARP Research Proceedings, IRRI/AB-DLO, Wageningen, Netherlands, p. 159.Google Scholar
Xihua, W, Wenxi, L, Jun, XY, Guangxin, Z, Wu, Q and Weiguo, C (2016) The positive impacts of irrigation schedules on rice yield and water consumption: synergies in Jilin Province, northeast China. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 14, 1–12.Google Scholar
Yadav, S, Gill, G, Humphreys, E, Kukal, SS and Walia, US (2011) Effect of water management on dry seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Part 1: crop performance. Field Crops Research 120, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, Lin, S, Bouman, BAM, Xue, C, Wei, F, Tao, H, Yang, X, Wang, H, Zhao, D and Dittert, K (2009) Response of aerobic rice growth and grain yield to N fertilizer at two contrasting sites near Beijing, China. Field Crops Research 114, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, SJ and Bastiaanssen, WGM (2004) Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agricultural Water Management 69, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar