Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T10:18:02.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in amino acid compounds of wheat plants during ensiling and aerobic exposure: the influence of propionic acid and urea phosphate-calcium propionate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Ashbell ,
H. H. Theune  and
D. Sklan
G. Ashbell
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Changes in distribution of amino acid nitrogen of chopped wheat plants ensiled at shooting and flowering when wilted, and at the milk and dough stages as fresh material, were determined as affected by addition of 0·8% propionic acid (PrA) or 2·2% urea phosphate-calcium propionate (UP-CaPr). Analyses were carried out after an ensiling period of 90 days and after a further aerobic exposure period (AE) of 7 days.

Total amino acid (TAA) contents in the dry matter (D.M.) during the fermentation period and in the AE were stable in untreated material (UM) and treated material. Concentration of essential amino acids decreased during fermentation, this decrease being higher in the UM. The free amino acids were low in the fresh material (18·6% of TAA) but increased in the ensiled material to ca. 71 % of the TAA in the silage. In the AE this level was 63% in UM and 69% in treated material. The ammonia-N contents increased during fermentation in UM and especially in the UP-CaPr treatments, while the opposite occurred in the PrA treatments.

The concentrations of and changes in 21 amino acids (AAs) are given. The highest AA concentrations recorded in the fresh material were those of arginine, lysine, glutamic acid, alanine, leucine, proline and glycine. The most marked increments in AAs as a result of fermentation were those of ornithine, γ-amino butyric acid, threonine and methionine. Marked decreases were observed in glutamine, arginine and glutamic acid. PrA increased mainly arginine, asparagine and glutamine, whereas γ-amino butyric acid decreased; UP-CaPr increased arginine, asparagine, lysine and glutamic acid (in silage only) and reduced γ-amino butyric acid and glutamine (in AE only).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 667 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daniel, P., Honig, H., Weise, F. & Zimmer, E. (1970). Wirkung von Propionsäure in der Grunfuttersilierung. Das Wirtschafteigene Futter 16, 239–252.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, C. H., Derbyshire, J. C., Wiseman, H. G., Kane, E. A & Melin, C. G. (1961). Preservation and feeding value of alfalfa stored as hay, haylage and direct-cut silage. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1299–1311.Google Scholar
Harris, C. E. & Rymond, W. F. (1963). The effect of ensiling on crop digestibility. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T., Thomas, J. W. & Enery, R. S. (1968). Response of lactating cows fed urea-treated corn silage harvested at varying stages of maturity. Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1806–1810.Google Scholar
Kemble, A. R. & Macpherson, H. T. (1954). Liberation of amino acids in perennial rye grass during wilting. Biochemistry Journal 58, 46–49.Google Scholar
Kozakiewicz, Z. & Clarke, J. H. (1973). Techniques for determining toxicity of propionic acid to fungi from stored grain. Transactions British Mycology Society 61, 355–367.Google Scholar
Lessard, J.R., Erfle, F. D. & Mamadevan, S. (1978). Protein and free amino acid patterns in maize ensiled with or without urea. Journal of the Science ofFood and Agriculture 29, 506–512.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Stirling, A. C., Henderson, A. R., Dewar, W. A., Stark, G. H., Macpherson, H. T., Reid, A. M. & Slater, J. (1960). Edinburgh School of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 24.Google Scholar
Mann, E. M. & McDonald, P. (1976). The effect of formalin and lower volatile fatty acids on silage fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 612–616.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. (1979). The effects of wilting on fermentation in the silo and on the nutritive value of silage. Grass and Forage Science 14, 1–10.Google Scholar
Owens, F. N., Sharp, W. M. & Davis, G. (1981). Corn silage ammoniation time and protein solubility. Animal Science Research Report MP-108, 139–141. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Polan, C. E., Huber, J. T., Sandy, R. Q., Hall, J. W. & Miller, C. N. (1968). Urea-treated corn silage as the only forage for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1445–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, M. K., Bolsen, K. K. & Peart, L. A. (1982). Studies on the aerobic deterioration of wholecrop cereal silages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 529–535.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K., Honig, H. & Fenlon, J. S. (1977). Untersuchungen uber aerobe Umsezungen in Silage mit Hilfe Einer Labortechnik. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 20, 10–22.Google Scholar