Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:22:15.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Valuation in the Presence of Risky Substitutes: An Application to Demand for Seafood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ju-Chin Huang ,
Timothy C. Haab  and
John C. Whitehead
Ju-Chin Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
Timothy C. Haab
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
John C. Whitehead
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We attempt to value health risks by combining traditional demand impact analysis with direct elicitation of individuals' risk perceptions of food safety. We examine the impact of multiple risks of related goods on consumption of a risky good. We argue that the consumption of a risky good depends on both its absolute risk level and its relative risks to other risky goods. Seafood consumption in eastern North Carolina was studied. We elicited, in a survey, individual perceived risks as reference points to derive the economic value of reducing health risk in seafood consumption. Revealed and stated data were combined to trace out demand changes in response to absolute and relative risk reductions. Our results show that seafood consumption is affected by the perceived absolute risk and by the relative risk to poultry and that individuals react to the multiple risks in a nonlinear way, as was suggested by our analytical model.

Keywords

Absolute and Relative RisksFood Borne Health RiskRevealed and Stated DataRisk SubstitutesD1D8I12Q21
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , April 2004 , pp. 213 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J., and Williams, M.. “Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1997):65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G.A. “Consumer Preferences for Food Safety Attributes in Fresh Apples: Market Segments, Consumer Characteristics, and Marketing Opportunities.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1999):80–97.Google Scholar
Blend, J.R., and van Ravenswaay, E.O.. “Measuring Consumer Demand for Ecolabeled Apples.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):1072–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockstael, N.E., Hanemann, W.M., and Strand, I.E.. Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models, Benefit Analysis Using Indirect or Imputed Market Methods, Volume II, project report to Office of Policy Analysis, Office of Policy and Resource Management, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1984.Google Scholar
Bockstael, N.E., and Strand, I.E. Jr. “The Effect of Common Sources of Regression Error on Benefit Estimates.” Land Economics 63(1987):11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P.M. “The Northeast U.S. Market for Blue Mussels: Consumer Perceptions of Seafood Safety and Implications for Aquaculture.” Aquaculture, Models and Economics. Hatch, Upton and Kinnucan, Henry, eds. Bolder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Brown, D.J., and Schräder, L.E. “Cholesterol Information and Shell Egg Consumption.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzby, J.C., Fox, J.A., Ready, R.C., and Crutch-field, S.R.. “Measuring Consumer Benefits of Food Safety Risk Reductions.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30(1998):69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, J.A.Preface in Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition. Caswell, Julie A., ed., Bolder, Co: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Caswell, J.A. “Valuing the Benefits and Costs of Improved Food Safety and Nutrition.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 42(1998):409–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chern, W.S., Loehman, E.T., and Yen, S.T.. “Information, Health Risk Beliefs, and the Demand for Fats and Oils.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1995):555–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropper, M.L.Valuing Food Safety; Which Approaches to Use? Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition. Caswell, Julie A., ed., Bolder, Co: West-view Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Eom, Y.S. “Pesticide Residue Risk and Food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (1994):760–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J.A., Shogren, J.F., Hayes, D.J., and Klie-benstein, J.B.. Experimental Auctions to Measure Willingness to Pay for Food Safety. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Caswell, Julie A., ed., Bolder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Greene, WH.LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual, New York: Econometrics Software, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Golan, E., and Kuchler, F.. “Willingness to Pay for Food Safety: Costs and Benefits of Accurate Measures.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):1185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., and Zvi Griliches. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents—R&D Relationship.” Econometrica 52(1984):909–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henneberry, S.R., Piewthongngam, K., and Qiang, H.. “Consumer Food Safety Concerns and Fresh Produce Consumption.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1999):98–113.Google Scholar
Henson, S. “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Reductions in the Risk of Food Poisoning in the UK.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(1996):403–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.L., Kan, K., and Fu, T.-T.. “Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Food Safety in Taiwan: A Binary-Ordinal Probit Model of Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 33(1999):76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.L., “Joint Estimation of Consumer Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Food Safety.” Academia Economics Papers 28(2000):429–49.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47(1979):263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D.-K., and Chern, W.S.. Health Risk Concern of Households vs Food Processors: Estimation of Hedonic Prices in Fats and Oils. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Caswell, Julie A., ed., Bolder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K.J. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74(1966):132–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.-T. J., and Milon, J.W.. “Attribute and Safety Perceptions in a Double-Hurdle Model of Shellfish Consumption.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):724–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.-T. J., Contingent Valuation of Health Risk Reductions for Shellfish Products. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Caswell, Julie A., ed., Bolder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Liu, S., Huang, J.-C., and Brown, G.L.. “Information and Risk Perception: A Dynamic Adjustment Process.” Risk Analysis 18,6(1998):689–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, J.J., and Rausser, G.C.. “Estimation of Perceived Risk and Its Effect on Property Values.” Land Economics 77(2001):42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, S.L., Huang, CL., and Misra, S.K.. consumers' Perceptions of Risks from Pesticide Residues and Demand for Certification of Residue-Free Produce. Economics of Food Safety, Caswell, Julie A., ed., New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J., and Davis, G.C.. “The Theory and Econometrics of Health Information in Cross-Sectional Nutrient Demand Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001):840–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T., Buzby, J.C., and Ollinger, M.. “Using Benefit and Cost Information to Evaluate a Food Safety Regulation: HACCP for Meat and Poultry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):1297–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T., and Marks, S.. Valuation by the Cost of Illness Method: The Social Costs of Escherichia coli 0157.H7 Foodborne Disease. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Caswell, Julie A., ed., Bolder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Shogren, J.E., Fox, J.A., Hayes, D.J., and Roosen, J.. “Observed Choices for Food Safety in Retail, Survey, and Auction Markets,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):1192–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallwood, D.M., and Blaylock, J.R.. Consumer Demand for Food and Food Safety: Models and Applications. Economics of Food Safety, Caswell, Julie A., ed. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
Smith, M.E., van Ravenswaay, E., and Thompson, S.R.. “Sales Loss Determination in Food Contamination Incidents: An Application to Milk Bans in Hawaii.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1988):513–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.K., and Johnson, ER.. “How Do Risk Perceptions Respond to Information? The Case of Radon.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70(1988):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ravenswaay, E.O., and Hoehn, J.R. The Impact of Health Risk Information on Food Demand: A Case Study of Alar and Apples. Economics of Food Safety, Caswell, Julie A., ed. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
Van Ravenswaay, E.O., “The Theoretical Benefits of Food Safety Policies: A Total Economic Value Framework.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):1291–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ravenswaay, E.O., and Wohl, J.. Using Contingent Valuation Methods to Value the Health Risks from Pesticide Residues When Risks are Ambiguous. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Caswell, Julie A., ed. Bolder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W.K., and Evans, W.N.. “Estimation of Revealed Probabilities and Utility Functions for Product Safety Decisions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1998):28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessells, C.R., and Anderson, J.G.. “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Seafood Safety Assurances.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 29(1995):85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessells, CR., Johnston, R.J., and Donath, H.. “Assessing Consumer Preferences for Ecolabeled Seafood: The Influence of Species, Certifier, and Household Attributes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):1084–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K., Williams, C., Meekins, M., Handley, M., and Clarke, J.. “Annual Survey of Eastern North Carolina: Methods Report.” Survey Research Laboratory, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 1998.Google Scholar