Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:32:17.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quarterly Prediction Models for Live Hog Prices*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Richard J. Foote
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University; U.S. Agency for International Development
Sujit K. Roy
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
George Sadler
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University Southern Colorado University

Extract

Pronounced short-run movements in production, marketings, slaughter and prices of live hogs create problems of uncertainty in the decision-making process of producers and other participants in the hog-pork industry. The objective of the present study was to develop quarterly prediction models for live hog prices, based on structural relations representing the price-determining forces in the sector.

The relative importance of the hog sector in the livestock industry is underscored by the fact that the annual cash income for the sector ranks second to beef. For instance, in 1970, hogs accounted for about 15 percent of the total cash receipts from all livestock products. About one-half of total hog production in 1970 was in the seven states of West North Central Division, with Iowa accounting for almost one-fourth of all hog production in the United States. This division, along with four continguous and six southern states, accounted for about 90 percent of the total U.S. hog production. Although the total consumption of pork has increased over past decades, pork has represented a smaller percentage of total meat consumption. The per capita consumption of pork has shown no appreciable increase since the middle fifties, while that of beef rose steadily during the period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Manuscript No. T-1-142, College of Agricultural Sciences, Texas Tech University.

References

[1] Foote, Richard J., Williams, Robert R. and Craven., John A. Quarterly Shorter-Term Price Forecasting Models Relating to Cash and Futures Quotations for Pork Bellies, Economic Research Service, USDA, Technical Bulletin No. 1482, July 1973.Google Scholar
[2] Harlow, Arthur A. Factors Affecting the Price and Supply of Hogs, Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, Technical Bulletin No. 1274, 1962.Google Scholar
[3] Mandansky, A.On the Efficiency of Three-Stage Least-Squares Estimation,Econometrica, Volume 32, No. 1-2, January-April 1964, pp. 5166.Google Scholar
[4] Myers, L. H., Havlicek, J. Jr. and Henderson, P. L.. Short-Term Price Structure of the Hog-Pork Sector of the United States, Research Bulletin No. 855, Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, February 1970.Google Scholar
[5] Nerlove, Marc. The Dynamics of Supply: Estimation of Farmers’ Response to Price, Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1958.Google Scholar
[6] Theil, H. Applied Economic Forecasting, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1966.Google Scholar
[7] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Hogs and Pigs, Statistical Reporting Service.Google Scholar
[8] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Meat Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
[9] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Meat Statistics, Supplement to Statistical Bulletin No. 333, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, June 1971.Google Scholar
[10] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Poultry and Egg Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
[11] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Price Spreads for Beef and Pork, Revised Series 1949-1969, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, May 1970, p. 24.Google Scholar
[12] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Selected Statistical Series for Poultry and Eggs Through 1968, Revised January 1970, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, ERS 232.Google Scholar
[13] U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business, Bureau of Economic Analysis.Google Scholar
[14] U.S. Department of Labor Statistics. Employment and Earning Statistics of the United States, Tables C-2, C-5, C-6, C-7, line 2011, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
[15] Zellner, A. and Theil, H.. “Three-State Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations,” Econometrica, Volume 30, pp. 5478.Google Scholar