Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:21:28.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pricing Benefit Externalities of Soil Carbon Sequestration in Multifunctional Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jason G. Hartell
Jason G. Hartell*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Multifunctionality” emphasizes the benefit externality properties of nonfood products that coincide with agricultural commodity production, some of which also have public-good properties. However, determining the willingness to pay for local benefit externalities is seen as necessary but daunting. This paper pursues the idea that the valuation process might first start by estimating the incentives required to supply various levels of a benefit externality. With the use of carbon sequestration through the adoption of no-till cultivation as an example of a multifunctional benefit externality, mathematical programming is used to derive representative price schedules. The implication for incentive prices are examined in light of risk aversion.

Keywords

carbon sequestrationexternalitiesmultifunctionalityquadratic programmingC61D62Q12Q21
Type
Graduate Student Paper Award
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , August 2004 , pp. 491 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allmaras, R., Scomberg, H., Douglas, C. Jr., and Dao, T.. “Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential of Adopting Conservation Tillage in U.S. Croplands.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55,3(2000):365–73.Google Scholar
Antle, J., Capalbo, S., Mooney, S., Elliott, E.T, and Paustian, K.H.. “Sensitivity of Carbon Sequestration to Soil Carbon Rates.” Environmental Pollution 116(2002):413–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antle, J., Capalbo, S., Mooney, S., Elliott, E.T, and Paustian, K.H.. “Economic Analysis of Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration: An Integrated Assessment Approach.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26,2(2001):344–67.Google Scholar
Atance, I., and Bardaji, I.. “Intervention in Agricultural Systems That Provide Positive Environmental Externalities: An Evaluation of Alternative Instruments.” Contributed paper at the 10th European Association of Agricultural Economists Congress, Zaragossa, Spain, August 20-25, 2002.Google Scholar
Blandford, D., and Boisvert, R.. “Non-Trade Concerns and Domestic/International Policy Choice.” Working paper 02-1, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, 2002.Google Scholar
Bohman, M., Cooper, J., Mullarkey, D., Normile, M., Skully, D., Vogel, S., and Young, E.. The Use and Abuse of Multifunctionality. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service/USDA, 1999.Google Scholar
Bruce, N.Public Finance and the American Economy, 2nd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman, 2001.Google Scholar
Buzby, J., Kenkel, P., Skees, J., Pease, J., and Benson, E.. “A Comparison of Subjective and Historical Yield Distributions with Implications for Multiple Peril Crop Insurance.” Staff paper 274, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, 1990.Google Scholar
Dillon, C. “Production Practice Alternatives for Income and Suitable Field Day Risk Management.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31,2(1999):247–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dismukes, R., Allen, P., and Morzuch, B.. “Participation in Multiple-Peril Crop Insurance: Risk Assessments and Risk Preferences of Cranberry Growers.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18,2(October 1989):109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A., and Pindyck, R.. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donigian, A., Barnwell, T., Jackson, R., Patwardhan, A., Weinrich, K., Rowell, A., Chinnaswamy, R., and Cole, C.. “Assessment of Alternative Management Practices and Policies Affecting Soil Carbon in Agro-ecosystems of the Central United States.” Report EPA/600/12-94/067. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, April 1994.Google Scholar
Ekman, S. “Tillage System Selection: A Mathematical Programming Model Incorporating Weather Variability.” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 77,3(2000):2267–76.Google Scholar
Freshwater, D. “A U.S. Perspective on Multifunctionality.” Staff paper 423, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, January 2002.Google Scholar
Freund, R. “The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model.” Econometrica 24,3(1956):253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhue, R., Guillaume, G., and Klonsky, K.. “Public Preferences, Pressure Groups, and Public Policy Regarding Multifunctionality in Agriculture: Compatibility and Conflict.” Contributed paper at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, July 28-31, 2002.Google Scholar
Hardaker, J., Huirne, R., and Anderson, J.. Coping with Risk in Agriculture. New York: CAB International, 1997.Google Scholar
Hellwinckel, C., Larson, J., and Ugarte, D.. “Incentives for Switching Agricultural Land to Carbon Sequestering No-Tillage: What Durations are Incentives Necessary?” Selected paper at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Mobile, AL, February 1-5, 2003.Google Scholar
Krall, J., Nachtman, J., and Miller, S.. “A Comparison of Irrigated Corn Production in No-Till and Plowed Alfalfa Sod.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50,1(1995):75–77.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Brown, D., and Lovejoy, S.. “Stochastic Efficiency Versus Mean-Variance Criteria as Predictors of Adoption of Reduced Tillage.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67,4(1985):839–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarl, B., and Bessler, D.. “Estimating an Upper Bound on the Pratt Risk Aversion Coefficient When the Utility Function is Unknown.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 33,1(1989):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarl, B., and Spreen, T.. Applied Mathematical Programming Using Algebraic Systems. 1997. Internet site: http://agrinet.tamu.edu/faculty/mccarl/regbook.htm (Accessed January 2000).Google Scholar
Mehdi, R., Madromootoo, C., and Mehuys, G.. “Yield and Nitrogen Content of Corn Under Different Tillage Practices.” Agronomy Journal 91(1991):631–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. Jr. “Externalities as Commodities.” The American Economic Review 61,4(1971):736–40.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD, 2001.Google Scholar
Popp, M., Oliver, L., Dillon, C., Keisling, T., and Manning, P.. “Evaluation of Seedbed Preparation, Planting Method, and Herbicide Alternatives for Dryland Soybean Production.” Agronomy Journal 92(2000):1149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. “Valuing the Outputs of Multifunctional Agriculture.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 29,3(2002):289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicosky, D. “Effects of Conservation Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics: Field Experiments in the U.S. Corn Belt.” Sustaining the Global Farm. Scott, D., Mohtar, R., and Steinhardt, G., eds., pp. 481–85. Selected papers from the 100th International Soil Conservation Or ganization Meeting, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, May 24-29, 1999.Google Scholar
Schillinger, W., Cook, R., and Papendiek, R.. “Increased Dryland Cropping Intensity with No-Till Barley.” Agronomy Journal 91(1999):744–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, U. “The Cost of Agricultural Carbon Savings.” Working paper 02-WP 306. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, June 2002.Google Scholar
Shapiro, C., Holshouser, D., Kranz, W., Shelton, D., Witkowski, J., Jarvi, K., Echtenkamp, G., Lunz, L., Frerichs, R., Brentlinger, R., Lubberstedt, M., McCluskey, M., and Stroup, W.. “Tillage and Management Alternatives for Returning Conservation Reserve Program Land to Crops.” Agronomy Journal 93(2001):850–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, A., Schepers, J., Olson, R., and Power, J.. “Irrigated Corn Yield and Nitrogen Accumulation Response in a Comparison of No-Till and Conservation Till: Tillage and Surface-Residue Variables.” Agronomy Journal 90(1998):630–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, E., and Young, D.. “An Operational Approach for Evaluating Investment Risk: An Application to the No-Till Transition.” Contributed paper at the WEAI and WAEA Annual Meetings, Denver, CO, July 11-15, 2003.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. “Carbon Sequestration Research and Development.” Office of Fossil Energy, Office of Science, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar
Varian, H.Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 1992.Google Scholar
Vetsch, J., and Randall, G.. “Corn Production as Affected by Tillage System and Starter Fertilizer.” Agronomy Journal 94(2002):532–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyn, T., and Janovicek, K.. “Potassium Placement and Tillage System Effects on Corn Response Following Long-Term No Till.” Agronomy Journal 93(2001):487–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, T., and Post, W.. “Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis.” Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(2002):1930–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., and Babcock, B.. “Contract Design for the Purchase of Environmental Goods from Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78,4(1996):935–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar