Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T12:20:34.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vertical and Horizontal Coordination in the Agro-biotechnology Industry: Evidence and Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes  and
Bruce Bjornson
Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri
Bruce Bjornson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Agro-biotechnology is evolving from a pre-commerical phase dominated by basic research science to a commercial phase oriented around marketing products. In pursuing innovation rents in the commercial phase, firms are reorienting their strategies around complementary marketing and distribution assets. This is impacting vertical and horizontal industry structure. Conversely, industry structure is also impacting firm strategies. Horizontal alliances and consolidation continue from the pre-commercial phase into the commercial phase, while vertical coordination and integration strategies are accelerating rapidly. Interplay between firm strategy and industry structure is too complex for firms to anticipate early in the pre-commercial phase for long-term strategy formulation.

Keywords

acquisitionsagricultural biotechnologyfirm strategyindustry consolidationindustry structuremergers
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , July 1997 , pp. 129 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernathy, W., and Utterback, J.. “Patterns of Industrial Innovation.” Technology Rev. 80(1978):40–47.Google Scholar
Acharya, R. “Patenting Biotechnology: GATT and the Erosion of the World's Biodiversity.” J. World Trade 25(1991):71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B., and Link, A.. Investments in Technology: Corporate Strategies and Public Policy Alternatives. New York: Praeger, 1983.Google Scholar
Cohen, W., and Levin, R.. “Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, eds., Scmalensee, R. and Willig, R.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change.” Res. Policy ll(1982):147-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, M., and Marth, E.. “Food Safety Issues in Biotechnology.” In Agricultural Biotechnology: Issues and Choices, eds., Baumgardt, W. and Martin, M.. Agr. Exp. Sta., Purdue University, 1991.Google Scholar
Goldburg, R., Rissler, J., Shand, H., and Hasse, C.-brook. “Biotechnology's Bitter Harvest: A Report to the Technology Working Group.” National Wildlife Federation, Washington DC, 1990.Google Scholar
Heijbroek, A., deSchutter, E., and vanGaasbeek, A.. The World Seed Market: Development and Strategies. The Netherlands: Rabobank, 1996.Google Scholar
Joly, P., and deLooze, M.. “An Analysis of Innovation Strategies and Industrial Differentiation Through Patent Applications: The Case of Plant Biotechnology.” Res. Policy 25(1996)1014–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juskevich, J., and Guyer, G.. “Bovine Growth Hormone: Human Food Safety Evaluation.” Science 249(1990):875-84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, R., and Hueth, D.. “Multimarket Exploitation: The Case of Biotechnology and Chemicals.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993):936-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H., and Tauer, L.. “Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on U.S. Dairy Markets Under Alternative Policy Options.” N. Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 21(1989):59–73.Google Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R., and Alchian, A.. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” J. Law and Econ. 21(1978):297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, W., Busch, L., and Lacy, L.. “Public Perceptions of Agriculture Biotechnology.” In Agricultural Biotechnology: Issues and Choices, eds., Baumgardt, W. and Martin, M.. Agr. Exp. Sta., Purdue University, 1991.Google Scholar
Larson, B., and Knudson, M.. “Public Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology Field Tests: Economic Implications of Alternative Approaches.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73(1991):1074–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, C, and Wohlgenant, M.. “Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989):903-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, W., Magrath, W., and Kalter, R.. “Projecting Adoption Rates: Application of an Ex Ante Procedure to Biotechnology Products.” N. Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 8(1986):159-74.Google Scholar
Marion, B., and Wills, R.. “A Prospective Assessment of the Impacts of Bovine Somatotropin: A Case Study of Wisconsin.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990):326-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J.. Economics, Organization, and Management. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.Google Scholar
Molnar, J., and Kinnucan, H.. “The Biotechnology Revolution.” In Biotechnology and the New Agricultural Revolution, eds., Molnar, J. and Kinnucan, H.. Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mowery, D.International Collaborative Ventures in U.S.Manufacturing. Cambridge MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1988.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. “The Relationship Between Intrafirm and Contractual Forms of Industrial Research in American Manufacturing, 1900-1940.” Explorations in Econ. History 20(1983):351-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. A New Technological Era for American Agriculture. Pub. No. OTA-F-474. Washington DC: U.S.Government Printing Office, 1992.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Biotechnology: Economic and Wider Impacts. OECD, Paris, France, 1989.Google Scholar
Pisano, G. “The Governance of Innovation: Vertical Integration and Collaboration Agreements in the Biotechnology Industry.” Res. Policy 20(1991):237-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisano, G. “Using Equity Participation to Support Exchange: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry.” J. Law, Econ., and Organization 5(1988):109-26.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. “Industrial Organization and Economic Progress.” In The State of Social Sciences, ed., White, L.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Teece, D. “The Market for Know-how and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology.” Annals Academy Polit. and Social Sci. 458(1981):81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy.” In The Competitive Challenge, ed., Teece, D.. Cambridge MA: Bal-linger Publishing Co., 1987.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. “Ethics and Agricultural Biotechnology.” Sci. Food and Agr. 5(1993):8–9.Google Scholar
Utterback, J.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. “Appropriability of Innovation Benefit as a Predictor of the Source of Innovation.” Res. Policy 11(1982):95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, S.Agrow's Top 25. London: PJB Publications, Ltd., 1996.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Zepeda, L. “Predicting Bovine Somatotropin Use by California Dairy Farmers.” West. J. Agr. Econ. 15(1990):55–62.Google Scholar