Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T00:38:19.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential for Revenue Insurance Policies in the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jerry R. Skees ,
Joy Harwood ,
Agapi Somwaru  and
Janet Perry
Jerry R. Skees
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Joy Harwood
Affiliation:
Market and Trade Economics Division of the Economic Research Service (ERS), USDA
Agapi Somwaru
Affiliation:
ERS, USDA
Janet Perry
Affiliation:
ERS, USDA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 1996 Farm Act and the 1994 Crop Insurance Reform Act are recent examples of policy changes that have increased risks for U.S. farmers. New products are emerging to help farmers manage risks. This article examines some of the policy changes, farmer responses, and new risk-sharing products. The focus turns to the new revenue insurance products and their potential in the South. While there are reasons to believe revenue insurance should be attractive in the South, any revenue products that use existing crop insurance rates will face difficulties since poor actuarial performance in the South has resulted in relatively high rates.

Keywords

agricultural policycrop insurancerevenue insurancerisksouthern agriculture
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , July 1998 , pp. 47 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, B.A., and Hennessy, D.. “Input Demand Under Yield and Revenue Insurance.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 78(May 1996):416-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleaveland, B. Senior Vice-President, American Agrisurance, Inc., Council Bluffs IA. Personal communication, January 1998.Google Scholar
Glauber, J.W., and Miranda, M.J.. “1996 Price Stabilization, Revenue Stabilization, and the Natural Hedge.” Unpub. Manu., Office of the Chief Economist, USDA, Washington DC, and Dept. of Agr. Econ., Ohio State Univ., 30 October 1996. (30 pp.)Google Scholar
Harwood, J., Heifner, D., Coble, K., and Perry, J.. “Strategies for a New Risk Environment.” Agr. Outlook, no. 234(October 1996):24–30.Google Scholar
Heifner, R. “Price Analysis for Determining Revenue Insurance Indemnities and Premiums.” Report to the Risk Management Agency, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, November 1996.Google Scholar
Heifner, R., and Coble, K.. “The Effects on Farmers' Risks of Combining Forward Pricing with Crop or Revenue Insurance.” Work. Pap., USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, Fall 1977.Google Scholar
Lee, H., Harwood, J., and Somwaru, A.. “Implications of Disaster Assistance Reform for Non-Insured Crops.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 79(May 1997):419-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirand, M.J. “Area Yield Insurance Reconsidered.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73(May 1991):233-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. “Impact of Selected Agricultural Policy Instruments on International Price Variability.” Work. Pap., OECD, Paris, 11 December 1997a.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. “Price Variability in Cereal Markets and Risk Management Strategies for Market Participants.” Work. Pap., OECD, Paris, 15 September 1997b.Google Scholar
Skees, J.R., Black, J.R., and Barnett, B.J.. “Designing and Rating an Area Yield Crop Insurance Contract.” Amer. J.Agr. Econ. 79(May 1997):430-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skees, J.R., and Nutt, P.J.. “The Cost of Purchasing Crop Insurance: Examining the Sensitivity of Farm Financial Risk.” Agr. Fin. Rev. 48(1988):37–47.Google Scholar
Spurlock, S.R., Barnett, B.J., Dhar, S., Isengildina, O., Meerungruang, S., Mumma, G., and Murova, O.. “Evaluating Crop and Revenue Insurance Purchase Decisions in the Mid-South.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Little Rock AR, 31 January-3 February 1998.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. “Performance Comparisons: ASCS and FCIC.” GAO Internal Rep., Washington DC, 1993.Google Scholar