Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:18:11.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Efficiency of Feeder Cattle Hedging in Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Stephen L. O'Bryan ,
Barry W. Bobst  and
Joe T. Davis
Stephen L. O'Bryan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Barry W. Bobst
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Joe T. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent commodity price volatility and development of new futures contracts has kindled interest in hedging among farmers in many parts of the country. Due to the importance of feeder cattle production in Kentucky and in the South generally, recent development of a feeder cattle contract is of special interest. This paper addresses some potential problems associated with use of feeder cattle futures markets by Kentucky producers. Specifically, it tries to: (1) determine the effect, if any, of location basis variability on ex post hedging results in Kentucky markets versus delivery markets at Omaha and Oklahoma City, (2) assess the ability of hedging to reduce revenue variability as compared to cash marketing and (3) determining the presence of bias in feeder cattle futures prices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , July 1977 , pp. 185 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bobst, Barry W. “Location Basis Variability Effects on Slaughter Cattle Hedging in the South and Southern Plains,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 5, Number 2, December 1973, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar
[2]Bobst, Barry W. “Effects of Location Basis Variability on Hedging of Slaughter Hogs in the South,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 5, Number 1, July 1973, pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
[3]Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Newsletter, Summer 1976.Google Scholar
[4]Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 1975-1976 Yearbook.Google Scholar
[5]Dixon, Wilfrid J. and Massey, Frank J. Jr.Introduction to Statistical Analysis, Third Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1969, pp. 308–310.Google Scholar
[6]Gray, Roger W. “The Characteristic Bias in Some Thin Futures Markets,” Food Research Institute Studies, Volume 1, Number 3, November 1960, pp. 298–312.Google Scholar
[7]Hieronymous, Thomas A.Economics of Futures Trading, New York: Commodity Research Bureau, 1971, pp. 167–168.Google Scholar
[8]Rutledge, Stephen F. “Minimum Cost Feeding Systems for Backgrounding Beef Cattle in Central Kentucky,” Unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 1975.Google Scholar
[9]Samuelson, Paul A. “Proof That Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly,” Industrial Management Review, Volume 6, 1965, pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
[10]Vollink, William and Ronald Raikes. “An Analysis of Delivery-Period Basis Determination for Live Cattle” Presented at the 1977 Meetings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Atlanta, Georgia, February 1977.Google Scholar