Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:05:14.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining Labor Substitution: Does Family Matter for U.S. Cash Grain Farmers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Jeremy M. D'Antoni ,
Aditya R. Khanal  and
Ashok K. Mishra
Jeremy M. D'Antoni
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Aditya R. Khanal
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University and Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Ashok K. Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University and Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The substitution of capital for labor and new labor-saving technologies has reduced the labor required for farming, yet many farms today depend on hired labor in some form. Common in the literature is the assumption of perfectly substitutable farm labor. This has implications for the operator's off-farm labor decision. Intuitively, different forms of farm labor have different impacts on production. We use the Agricultural and Resource Management Survey to estimate the elasticity of substitution between hired and family labor. The results provide little evidence to support the popular homogeneity assumption and find labor can be unitary and complimentary under certain scenarios.

Keywords

cash gainsfamilyfarm laborheterogeneityhired laborhomogeneitylaborseemingly unrelatedsubstitutionD13J22J23Q12Q18R38
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 273 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearn, M.C.El-Osta, H., and Dewbre, J.. “The Impact of Coupled and Decoupled Government Subsidies on Off-Farm Labor Supply”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2006):393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahearn, M.C.Harrington, D., Hoppe, R., and Korb, P.. “Decoupled and Coupled Payments Alter Household Labor Allocation”. Decoupled Payments in a Changing Policy Settings. Burfisher, M.E. and Hopkins, J., eds. Washington, DC: USDA, ERS, Agricultural Economic Report No. 838, 2004.Google Scholar
Benjamin, D. “Household Composition, Labor Markets, and Labor Demand: Testing for Separation in Agricultural Household Models”. Econometrica 60(1992):287–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, E. and Wood, D.. “Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy”. The Review of Economics and Statistics 57(1975):376–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigsby, H. “Production Structure and the Australian Sawmilling Industry”. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 38(1994):271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binswanger, H.P. “A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56(1974):377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binswanger, H.P. and Rosenzweig, M.R.. “Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture”. The Journal of Development Studies 22,3(1986):503–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, M.Cahuzac, E., and Elyakime, B.. “Demand for On-Farm Permanent Hired Labour on Family Holdings”. European Review of Agriculture Economics 38,4(2008a):493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, M.Cahuzac, E., and Elyakime, B.. “Demand for On-Farm Permanent Hired Labour on Family Holdings: A Rejoinder”. European Review of Agriculture Economics 38,4(2008b):609–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, G.J.Grogger, J., and Hanson, G.H.. “Substitution between Immigrants, Natives, and Skill Groups”. Working paper in School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Antoni, J.M. and Mishra, A.K.. “Welfare Implications of Reduced Government Subsidies to Farm Families: Accounting for Fringe Benefits”. Agricultural Economics 44,2(2013):72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P. “Labour on the Family Farm: A Theory and Some Policy Implications”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 35(1984): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deolalikar, A.B. and Vijverberg, W.P.. “The Heterogeneity of Family and Hired Labor in Agricultural Production: s Test Using District Level Data from India”. Journal of Economic Development 8(1983):45–69.Google Scholar
Deolalikar, A.B. and Vijverberg, W.P.. “A Test of Heterogeneity of Family and Hired Labour in Asian Agriculture”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49(1987):291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewbre, J. and Mishra, A. “Impact of Program Payments on Time Allocation and Farm Household Income”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, W. and Wales, T.. “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions”. Econometrica 55(1987):43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubman, R. Variance Estimation with USDA's Farm Cost and Returns Surveys and Agricultural Resource Management Study Survey. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2000.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. Agricultural Information Bulletin Number 760. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2000.Google Scholar
El-Osta, H. “The Impact of Human Capital on Farm Operator Household Income”. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40(2011):95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eswaran, M. and Kotwal, A.. “Access to Capital and Agrarian Production Organization”. The Economic Journal 96(1986):482–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fafchamps, M. and Quisumbing, A.R.. “Human Capital, Productivity, and Labor Allocation in Rural Pakistan”. The Journal of Human Resources 34(1999):369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G. “The Relationship between Farm Size and Farm Productivity: The Role of Family Labor, Supervision and Credit Constraints”. Journal of Development Economics 18(1985):297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisvold, G. “Does Supervision Matter? Some Hypothesis Tests Using Indian Farm-Level Data”. Journal of Development Economics 43(1994):217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedikoglu, H. and Parcell, J.. “Implications of Survey Sampling Design for Missing Data Imputation”. Paper presented at the 2013 AAEA & CAEA Joint Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 4-6, 2013.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K. and Mishra, A.K.. “Are ‘Decoupled’ Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled?: An Empirical Evaluation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2006):73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R.A.Korb, P., O'Donoghue, E.J., and Banker, D.E.. Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm Report. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2007.Google Scholar
Huffman, W.E. “The Productive Value of Human Time in U.S. Agriculture”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1976):672–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isserman, A. Defining Regions for Rural America. Kansas City, KS: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2002.Google Scholar
Jacoby, H.G. “Shadow Wages and Peasant Family Labor Supply: Application to the Peruvian Sierra”. The Review of Economic Studies 60(1993):903–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, D. and Leroux, H.. “Leaving the Household Out of Family Labour? The Implications for the Size-Efficiency Debate”. European Journal of Development Research 19(2007):355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendel, W. Profile of Hired Farmworkers, A 2008 Update. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report # 66, 2008.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J. and Gilbert, R.F.. “Small Sample Properties of Alternative Estimators of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63(1968): 1180–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, A.Morehart, M., El-Osta, H., Johnson, J., and Hopkins, J.. Income, Wealth, and Well-being of Farm Operator Households. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economics Report # 812, 2002.Google Scholar
Mishra, A.K. and Holthausen, D.M.. “Effect of Farm Income and Off-Farm Wage Variability on Off-Farm Labor Supply”. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31 (2002): 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. Understanding American Agriculture: Challenges for the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Robbins, M.Ghosh, S., and Habiger, J.. “Imputation in High-Dimensional Economic Data as Applied to the Agricultural Resource Management Survey”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108(2013):81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, T.P. “Women's Role in the Agricultural Household: Bargaining and Human Capital”. Center Discussion Paper No. 803. New Haven, CT: Yale University: Economic Growth Center, 1999.Google Scholar
Singh, I.Squire, L., and Strauss, J.. Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.E. “Agricultural Labor and Migration Policy”. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2(2010):369–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.E. and Adelman, I.. “Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extension”. Review of Economics of the Household 1(2003):33–58.Google Scholar
White, T.K. and Hoppe, R.A.. Changing Farm Structure and the Distribution of Farm Payments and Federal Crop Insurance. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2012.Google Scholar