We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
My general reaction to Debertin and Pagolatos' presentation is that it is too narrow. In looking at the implications of higher liquid fuel costs for Southern agriculture, Debertin and Pagolatos have concentrated almost exclusively on on-farm adjustments. It is important to try to understand such adjustments, and the report is helpful as a starting place for further analysis. But the on-farm adjustments to higher liquid fuel prices are not independent of other adjustments taking place beyond the farm gate — adjustments in the agricultural sector generally and in the total economy. Indeed, there is a simultaneity in the overall adjustment process that not only makes the production economices perspective too narrow but also suggests the need for a general, as opposed to partial, equilibrium perspective.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Economics, Statistics and Cooperatives Services, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Another Revolution in U.S. Farming? Agr. Inf. Bull. No. 433, 1980.Google Scholar