Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:19:04.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Economics: A Profession in Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Lester H. Myers
Lester H. Myers*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The premise of this paper is that agricultural economics, as a distinct subdiscipline of economics, faces perhaps the most serious challenges since struggling for a separate identity nearly a century ago. I fully appreciate the fact that nearly all professional presidential addresses key on the theme of change to one extent or another. However, the environment within which we practice our profession is undergoing such significant transition that I believe radical changes are needed in how we frame and implement our instructional, research, and outreach programs. In his 1986 American Agricultural Economics Association presidential address, Joe Havlicek identified five megatrends affecting agriculture that he believed would have profound implications for our profession: (1) food consumption changes, (2) internationalism and macroeconomic forces, (3) technological change, (4) structural change, and (5) environmentalism.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , August 2003 , pp. 229 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boehlje, M. “Structural Changes in the Agricultural Industries: How Do We Measure, Analyze, and Understand Them?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):1028–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghelfi, L.M. “Most Persistently Poor Rural Counties in the South Remained Poor in 1995.” Rural America 15,4 (February 2001):36–49.Google Scholar
Gibson, P. “Take Charge.” Internet site: http://www.iig.vt.edu/take_charge.htm (Accessed January 2003).Google Scholar
Havlicek, J. Jr. “Megatrends Affecting Agriculture: Implications for Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(1986):1053–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. “Exploring Policy Options for a New Rural America: Conference Synthesis.” Exploring Policy Options for a New Rural America, conference proceedings. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Center for Rural America (2001):185–93.Google Scholar
McMahon, P. “Sister, could you spare the city $3.32?” USA Today. January 21, 2003:3A.Google Scholar
Mishra, A.K., El-Osta, H.S., Morehart, M.J., Johnson, J.D., and Hopkins, J.W.. “Income, Wealth, and the Economic Well-Being of Farm Households.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 812, 2002.Google Scholar
Purcell, W., and Alwang, J.. “Taxation: No Simple Answers.” Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech University, Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Econ. REAP Policy Paper No. 11, 2000.Google Scholar
Tsoulouhas, T., and Vukina, T.. “Regulating Broiler Contracts: Tournaments Versus Fixed Performance Standards.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001):1062–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar