Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T04:12:10.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Adoption of Best-Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Producers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Noro C. Rahelizatovo
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Jeffrey M. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA

Abstract

This study examines the adoption of best-management practices (BMPs) in terms of the total number of practices implemented up to a certain period, using count data analysis. Poisson and negative binomial regressions were used to examine the likely determinants of producers' decisions to adopt greater numbers of technologies, and the specific case of dairy producers' adoption of BMPs was explored. Our results emphasize the significant effect of producers' awareness of the efforts to control non-point source pollution, information about BMPs, farm size, producer's educational attainment, and risk aversion on the number of BMPs adopted.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbier, E.B.The Farm-Level Economics of Soil Conservation: The Uplands of Java.Land Economics 66(May 1990):199211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, D.N.The Analysis of Count Data: Over-dispersion and Autocorrelation.Sociological Methodology 22(1992):179220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basarir, A.Multidimensional Goals of Farmers in the Beef Cattle and Dairy Industries.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2002.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C., and RK. Trivedi. “Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparisons and Applications of some Estimators and Tests.Journal of Applied Econometrics 1(1986):2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A.C., Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Society Monograph 30. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A.C., RK. Trivedi, R.K., Milne, F., and Pig-gott, J.. “A Microeconometric Model of the Demand for Health Insurance and Health Care in Australia.Review of Economic Studies 55(1988):85106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, H.Analysis of Policy Alternatives in the Implementation of Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program for Agriculture.” PhD. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 1999.Google Scholar
Caswell, M., and Zilberman, D.. “The Choices of Irrigation Technologies in California.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(May 1985):224–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.C.A Joint Framework for Analysis of Agri-Environmental Payment Programs.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Chicago, Illinois, August 5-8, 2001.Google Scholar
Dillman, D.A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
Doms, M., Dunne, T., and Roberts, M.J.. “The Role of Technology Use in the Survival and Growth of Manufacturing Plants.International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(1995):523–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, J.H.Modeling Multiple Adoption Decisions in a Joint Framework.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(August 1996):547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drapcho, C.M., Beatty, J.E, and Achberger, E.C. “Water Quality and the Tangipahoa River.Louisiana Agriculture 44(Spring 2001):16–7.Google Scholar
El-Osta, H.S., and Morehart, M.J.. “Technology Adoption Decisions in Dairy Production and the Role of the Herd Expansion.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 28(April 1999):8495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausti, S.W., and Gillespie, J.M.. “A Comparative Analysis of Risk Preference Elicitation Procedures Using Mail Survey Results.” Selected paper presented at the annual meetings of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, Vancouver, Canada, July 2000.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D.. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries. A Survey.” Working paper 542. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Beach, E.D., and Huang, W.-Y.. “The Adoption of IPM Techniques by Vegetable Growers in Florida, Michigan and Texas.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26(July 1994):158–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, H.E.Rural Manufacturing on the Crest of the Wave: A Count Data Analysis of Technology Use.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(May 1998):347–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, S., McGuckin, J.T., and Kumbhakar, S.C. “Technical Efficiency, Risk Attitude, and Adoption of New Technology: The Case of the U.S. Dairy Industry.Technological Forecasting and Social Change 46(July 1994):269–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, B.W., Saupe, WE., and Klemme, R.M.. “Conservation Tillage: The Role of Farm and Operator Characteristics and the Perception of Soil Erosion.Land Economics 65(May 1989):167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindasamy, R., and Cochran, M.J.. “The Conservation Compliance Program and Best Management Practices: An Integrated Approach for Economic Analysis.Review of Agricultural Economics 17(1995):369–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, WH.Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z.Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.Econometrica 25(October 1957):501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipe, VC, DeVuyst, E.A., Braden, J.B., and D.C White. “Simulation of a Group Incentive Program for Farmer Adoption of Best Management Practices.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30(October 2001):139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, M.A., and Black, J.R.. “Optimal Adoption Strategies for No-Till Technology in Michigan.Review of Agricultural Economics 17(September 1995):299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, J.S., and Triest, R.K.. “Technology Diffusion in U.S. Manufacturing: The Geographic Dimension.Technology and Growth Conference Proceedings, June 1996, pp. 215–59.Google Scholar
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (LSUAC). Dairy Production Best Management Practices (BMPs). Publication 2823. Baton Rouge: LSUAC, 2000.Google Scholar
Moser, M.C., and Barrett, C.B.. “The Complex Dynamics of Smallholder Technology Adoption: The Case of SRI in Madagascar.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, Long Beach, California, July 28-31, 2002.Google Scholar
Parsch, L.D., Keisling, T.C., Sauer, P.A., Oliver, L.R., and Crabtree, N.S.. “Economic Analysis of Conservation and Conventional Tillage Cropping Systems on Clayey Soil in Eastern Arkansas.Agronomy Journal 93,6(November-December 2001):1296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahelizatovo, N.C.Adoption of Best Management Practices in the Louisiana Dairy Industry.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2002.Google Scholar
Shields, M.L., Rauniyar, G.P., and Goode, EM.. “A Longitudinal Analysis of Factors Influencing Increased Technology Adoption in Swaziland, 1985-1991.Journal of Developing Areas 27 (July 1993):469–84.Google Scholar
Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K.D.. “Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(November 2000):9931005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, J., and Olson, K.. Farmers' Decision Processes and Adoption of Conservation Tillage. Staff Paper P97-9, Dept. of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 1997.Google Scholar
Zepeda, L.Simultaneity of Technology Adoption and Productivity.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(July 1994):4657.Google Scholar