Article contents
Agricultural Improvement and Political Protest on the Tonga Plateau, Northern Rhodesia*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
In Northern Rhodesia under colonial rule, much land was alienated from the Plateau Tonga for occupation by European settlers who were mainly maize farmers. The expansion of African farming from the late 1920s, aided by the growing use of the plough and draught oxen, caused such settlers to demand the imposition of marketing controls. The government sought to introduce conservation measures to protect the lands of African farmers from wanton misuse, and in 1946 it introduced an Improved Farming Scheme (I.F.S.) to check overcultivation among the Plateau Tonga. The I.F.S., while nurturing a small group of privileged farmers, was to antagonize most African producers and gave rise to charges of collaboration with the colonial administration. The non-political activities of the Farmers' Associations formed by the Improved Farmers lent substance to these charges which in the 1950s emanated largely from the ranks of local supporters of the African National Congress (A.N.C.). By 1959, the I.F.S. had failed to meet the expectations of its members, thereby bearing out the doubts and fears of its critics. This was to throw into the lap of the local A.N.C. movement several wealthy and educated farmers who had hitherto taken no active interest in protest politics but who were now convinced they had been misled.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977
References
1 The need for such research was noted by Henderson, Ian in ‘Origins of Nationalism in East and Central Africa: The Zambian case’, J. Afr. Hist., xi, 4 (1970), 601Google Scholar. There are a few useful passages in Gann, L. H., A History of Northern Rhodesia (London, 1964), 165–6, 222–6Google Scholar, 265–6, 287–9, 306–7, 374–6, and 424–5; while there is an account of Tonga commercial farming in the 1940s and 1950s by a former Director of Agriculture in Northern Rhodesia: see Allan, W., The African Husbandman (Edinburgh, 1965), 413–22.Google Scholar
2 For a detailed discussion of Tonga social structure, see Colson, Elizabeth, The Plateau Tonga of Northern Rhodesia: Social and Religious Studies, (Manchester, 1962).Google Scholar
3 For the pre-colonial history of the plateau Tonga, see Roberts, Andrew, A History of Zambia, (London, 1976), esp. 135–7.Google Scholar
4 Hellen has aptly described the government's policy of widespread alienation of land, in the hope that sometime in the future there would be a large settler influx, as a ‘Settler dream': Hellen, J. A., Rural Economic Development in Zambia, 1890–1964, (London, 1968), 135.Google Scholar
5 Zambesi Mission Record (hereafter Z.M.R.) IV, no. 58 (Oct. 1912).Google Scholar
6 BS2/76, Zambia National Archives (hereafter ZNA): Coryndon, to High Commissioner, 24 June 1905.Google Scholar
7 Z.M.R. vii, no. 106 (Oct. 1924), 428Google Scholar; cf. Gann, , History of Northern Rhodesia, 165–6.Google Scholar
8 Z.M.R. ix, no. 130 (Oct. 1930), 106–7.Google Scholar
9 For a classification of the soils of the Tonga plateau, see Trapnell, C. G. and Clothier, J. N., The Soils, Vegetation and Agricultural Systems of North-Western Rhodesia: Report of the Ecological Survey (Lusaka, 1938; second edition, 1957).Google Scholar
10 KTC 1/1/2/1, ZNA: Native Commissioner, Magoye, to Magistrate, Livingstone, 26 June 1913; also ZA 2/2, ZNA: District Circular no. 2, 1921.
11 For further details of this aspect of land alienation see Dixon-Fyle, M. R., ‘Politics and agrarian change among the Plateau Tonga of Northern Rhodesia, 1924–1963’ (Ph.D. thesis, London, 1976), 42–9, 66–72.Google Scholar
12 Dixon-Fyle, op. cit.; cf. Gann, , History of Northern Rhodesia, 225–6.Google Scholar
13 Baldwin, R. E., Economic Development and Export Growth: a study of Northern Rhodesia, 1920–1960, (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1966), 150–5.Google Scholar
14 Interviews on the plateau in 1973–4. This contrast persisted for many years: cf. Native Affairs Report, 1938, 2; and Allan, W., Gluckman, Max, Peters, D. U. and Trapnell, C. G., Land Holding and Land Usage among the Plateau Tonga of Mazabuka District (Rhodes-Livingstone Paper no. 14, Cape Town, 1948Google Scholar; Manchester, , 1968), 113Google Scholar, where it is noted that the use of the plough had not generally resulted in the cultivation of larger plots.
15 Interviews on the plateau, 1973–4. The cost of a plough appears to have ranged between £1 and £2 10s. up to the early 1950s. By the early 1930s, some farmers were asking as much as £1 a day for the use of one plough and a span of oxen: see Native Affairs Report (1932), 18.Google Scholar
16 Interview with Milambo, Ellison, 10 Feb. 1974.Google Scholar
17 KDB 6/1/1/2, ZNA: Mazabuka District Annual Report (1929).
18 KDB 6/7/3, ZNA: Mazabuka District Quarterly Report, 30 Sept. 1930.
19 C.O. 795/71, Public Records Office (P.R.O.), London: Report on the Problems of Agricultural Development among the Batonga of reserve XI, 31 Jan. 1934.
20 Baldwin, , Economic Development, 151Google Scholar; cf. Gann, , History of Northern Rhodesia, 264–5.Google Scholar
21 KDB 6/7/4, ZNA: Tax Collection Tour Report, 24 Oct. 1936.
22 Sec/AG/47, ZNA: Memorandum on the future policy and organization of the Department of Agriculture, 9 Aug. 1933.
23 Sec/AG/47, ZNA: Secretary of State's despatch no. 489, 23 Sept. 1937.
24 Sec/AG/47, ZNA: Memorandum on the work of the Agriculture Department, 25 Jan. 1938.
25 Ibid.
26 Agriculture Department, Annual Report (1938), 13.Google Scholar
27 Agriculture Department, Annual Report (1937), 12.Google Scholar
28 Agriculture Department, Annual Report (1941), 2.Google Scholar
29 Baldwin, , Economic Development, 161.Google Scholar
30 For full details of its recommendations, see Allan, et al. , Land Holding and Land UsageGoogle Scholar
31 For further details, see Johnson, C. E., ‘African Farming Improvement in the Plateau Tonga Maize Areas of Northern Rhodesia’, Northern Rhodesia Agricultural Bulletin no. II (1956).Google Scholar
32 Various interviews in these chieftaincies, 1973–4. In the Siamaundu area, the enthusiasm of chief Jakras Mondeh Siamaundu and the impact of the Kanchomba system ensured the scheme's success.
33 Interviews with Amos Walubita (12 Nov. 1973), Sibanda, Samuel (18 Nov. 1973)Google Scholar and Milambo, Ellison (10 Feb. 1974).Google Scholar
34 KSB 3/1 ZNA: District Notebook, Tour Report, no. 4, 1951.
35 Ibid.
36 Ibid.
37 Interview with Nyiimba, John Hauma, 19 Nov. 1973Google Scholar. This response was encountered in several interviews with Catholic and S.D.A. informants.
38 Native Affairs Report (1960), 66.Google Scholar
39 Allan, et al. . Land Holding and Land Usage, 88.Google Scholar
40 Johnson, , ‘Farming Improvement’, 8.Google Scholar
41 Morgan-Rees, A. M., ‘An Economic Survey of the Plateau Tonga Improved Farmers’, Northern Rhodesia Agricultural Bulletin, no. 14 (1958), 23.Google Scholar
42 Allan, et al. , Land Holding and Land Usage, 69.Google Scholar
43 Ibid.
44 Ibid. 35.
45 See Howard, R., ‘Report on Improved Farmers in the Monze area, Jan. 1952’, Mount Makulu Research Station Library, Lusaka.Google Scholar
46 Johnson, , ‘Farming Improvement’, 9–10.Google Scholar
47 Sec/Nat/66 f. N/0006/3, vol. iii, ZNA: District Office Report, 1950.
48 KSB 3/1, ZNA: Tour Report no. 4, 1951. Seven of the area's 145 farmers were to join Sixpence in the scheme in 1951. See Sec/Nat/366, ZNA: Tour Report no. 7. 1951.
49 Howard, as cited in n. 45.
50 Johnson, , ‘Farming Improvement’, 9.Google Scholar
51 Interviews with Sibanda, Samuel (18 Nov. 1973)Google Scholar, Liyanda, Nelson (9 Dec. 1973)Google Scholar and Chiabi, Lazarus (14 May 1974)Google Scholar, who had held key positions in local Farmers' Associations and provided most of the material on which this section is based. Their accounts were later checked against those of less prominent Association members.
52 This proviso was included mainly because the Association was designed to bring advanced cultivators together and its organizers believed it would be in a stronger bargaining position if its membership was thus restricted.
53 Interview with Liyanda, Nelson (9 Dec. 1973)Google Scholar who for a number of years (about eight in all) was leader of the Monze Association.
54 The Natural Resources Board was set up ‘to exercise general supervision over natural resources, to stimulate public interest in conservation, to recommend appropriate legislation, and to ensure coordination between the various bodies concerned’. See Makings, S. M., Agricultural Change in Northern Rhodesia/Zambia, 1945–65, (Stanford, 1966), 223.Google Scholar
55 Interviews with Sibanda, Samuel (18 Nov. 1973)Google Scholar and Liyanda, Nelson (9 Dec. 1973).Google Scholar
56 The money that had accumulated in the Maize pool's stabilization fund was transferred into this new fund in 1949 and was used for conservation purposes.
57 Native Affairs Report (1948), 59.Google Scholar
58 KSB 3/1, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 4, 1951.
59 Interview with Milambo, Ellison (10 Feb. 1974).Google Scholar
60 Sec/Nat/366. N/0834/4, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 16, 1953.
61 Ace. 75/25, vol. 1, ZNA: Milambo, Ellison to Mazabuka, D. C., 28 Mar. 1948.Google Scholar
62 See Rotberg, R. I., The Rise of Nationalism in Central Africa: the making of Malawi and Zambia, 1873–1964, (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1965), 235–316Google Scholar, for details of this and other general political developments.
63 From 262 in 1949–50, membership of the scheme rose to 450 in 1950–1 and 706 in 1951–2. See Johnson, , ‘Farming Improvement’, 9.Google Scholar
64 Interviews with Liyanda, Nelson (9 Dec. 1973)Google ScholarMichello, Job (19 June 1974) and others.Google Scholar
65 Informants said that Improved Farmers were usually guests at settler wedding, christening and other parties. They also got loans from their settler patrons.
66 Keemba Hill was also to produce Job Mayanda, the A.N.C.'s first Southern Provincial President.
67 The most prominent of these was Gideon Ndandala Mankapwi of Keemba Hill who, though an Improved Farmer, was a dedicated branch organizer.
68 Sec/Nat/366, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 9 of 1951.
69 Ibid.
70 N/0001/2/8, ZNA Provincial Agricultural Officer to Mazabuka, D. C., 12 Aug. 1952.Google Scholar
71 Ibid.
72 Apart from lands taken up by the Catholic and S.D.A. Missions, Ufwenuka and Chona chieftaincies on the eastern escarpment suffered no major land losses to white seelers. This partly explains the A.N.C's low profile in these chieftaincies. See Muchangwe, I. H., ‘Report on Ufwenuka/Chona Regional Pan’ (Lusaka, 1963), 4Google Scholar: Mount Makulu Research Station Library.
73 Sec/Nat/366, N/0834/3, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 10, 1952.
74 Sec/Nat/366. N/0834/4, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 9, 1953.
75 Interviews with Moonga, Naul (29 Apr. 1974)Google Scholar and Chingila, Thomas (30 Apr. 1974).Google Scholar
76 The District Commissioner, in 1952, noted the chief's ability to ‘run with the hare and hunt with the hounds’. See Sec/Nat/366. N/0834/3, ZNA Tour Report, no. 10, 1952.
77 Sec/Nat/366. N/0834, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 12, 1949.
78 Sec/Nat/366. N/0834/3, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 10, 1952.
79 Interviews in the area.
80 Sec/Nat/366, N/0834/3, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 10, 1952.
81 Howard, as cited in n. 45.
82 Sec/Nat/366, N/0834/4, ZNA: Tour Report, no. 5, 1953.
83 See Rotberg, , Rise of Nationalism, 214–52.Google Scholar
84 During the first two seasons of the loan scheme, nearly £1,500 was paid out to Improved Farmers. See Native Affairs Report (1954), 91.Google Scholar
85 Prominent among these was Paul Mwiindwa, Congress branch secretary in the area. Interview with Mwiindwa, Paul, 21 Nov. 1973.Google Scholar
86 Southern Province ‘Stock-taking’, 1960. Mount Makulu Research Station Library (Lusaka).
87 Native Affairs Report (1957), 78.Google Scholar
88 Native Affairs Report (1956), 79.Google Scholar
89 Northern Rhodesia Legislative Council Debates, 7 Nov. 1957, no. 93, col. 131.
90 The scheme made no progress in Mazabuka District and met only limited success in Choma District. See Native Affairs Report (1957), 80, and (1958), 71.Google Scholar
91 This was repeated in various interviews on the plateau.
92 Northern Rhodesia Legislative Council Debates, 7 Nov. 1957, no. 93, col. 175. See also Native Affairs Report (1957), 75.Google Scholar
93 Native Affairs Report (1957), 75.Google Scholar
94 Native Affairs Report (1958), 71.Google Scholar
95 Ibid. 67.
96 During 1958, the Authority's Inoculation Order was to be invoked at least seventeen times to compel African farmers to put their animals at the disposal of the Veterinary Department's staff. See Native Affairs Report, (1958), 71.Google Scholar
97 See Muchangwe as cited in n. 72: also interview with Kaluwe, Franklin (18 Dec. 1973).Google Scholar
98 Interview with Kazoka, William, 23 Apr. 1974.Google Scholar
99 By Jan. 1957, a total of six chiefs, including Naluama, had been deposed in Northern Rhodesia for reasons not unconnected with Congress. See Fabian Colonial Bureau (F.C.B.), 103/2/item 3, Congress circular, vol. III, no. 3. Jan. 1957, Rhodes House Library, Oxford. The Paramount Chief on the Tonga plateau, Mugodi Monze, was himself deposed in 1959: Native Affairs Report (1959), 66.Google Scholar
100 Expenditure on the I.F.S. for the Southern and Eastern Provinces rose from £87,403 in 1954–5 to £103, 973 in 1956–7: computed from various Agriculture Department Annual Reports.
101 Cf. Berger, Elena L., Labour, Race and Colonial Rule, (Oxford, 1974), 7, 238.Google Scholar
102 Native Affairs Report (1959), 70Google Scholar. Scotch carts were locally-produced two or four-wheeled wooden carts used as farm transport.
103 Interviews with Michello, Job (28 June 1974)Google Scholar, Milambo, Ellison (23 June 1974)Google Scholar and other Congress organizers.
104 ‘Southern Province, Stock-taking’, 1960Google Scholar. Mount Makulu Research Station Library (Lusaka). The Improved Farming scheme was finally terminated during the early 1960s.
105 See Dixon-Fyle, , ‘Politics and agrarian change’, 258–9, 282, 289–90, 341.Google Scholar
106 Ibid., 309, 383–7.
- 8
- Cited by