Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:08:37.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When voting turnout becomes contentious repertoire: how anti-ELAB protest overtook the District Council election in Hong Kong 2019

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2021

Maggie Shum Open the ORCID record for Maggie Shum [Opens in a new window]
Maggie Shum*
Affiliation:
Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under what conditions can voting turnout be transformed into a contentious repertoire? Based on the two case studies of the Umbrella Movement and the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill movement in Hong Kong, I compare how movement actors used the electoral arena to leverage their causes. I propose a new relationship between street and electoral politics – short-term mobilization that turns voting turnout into a contentious repertoire. I posit three necessary scope conditions for movements to perceive this electoral strategy as viable: (1) protest cycle precedes and/or overlaps with the electoral period, (2) election perceived to be competitive, and (3) closing of political opportunity window for street mobilization. I further argue that the tactics movements pursue in the electoral arena is conditional on the relationship between movement actors and political elites, and regime type. In democratic regimes where parties and elections are institutionalized and less volatile, movements are on a more solid ground to invest in a long-term electoral strategy with existing parties. Contrarily, electoral competition in authoritarian regimes tends to skew toward incumbent's advantage. Movement activists and political elites may seek short-term strategic mobilizations focusing on the election at hand rather than a long-term plan. This argument illuminates the common ground between collective action and voting, and thus bridging the two sets of literature for further engagement, as recent movements such as the Black Lives Matter and the Sunrise Movement in the United States and Navalny's anti-Putin movement in Russia are mobilizing their supporters to take on the electoral arena.

Keywords

Contentious politicselectionHong Kong
Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 248 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alimi, EY (2015) Repertoires of contention. In Della Porta, D and Diani, M (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 410–422.Google Scholar
Almeida, P (2010) Social movement partyism: collective action and oppositional political parties. In Van Dyck, N and McCammon, HJ (eds), Strategic Alliances: Coalition Building and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 170–196.Google Scholar
Almeida, P (2019) The role of threat in collective action. In Snow, DA, Soule, SA, Kriesi, H, and McCammon, HJ (eds), Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N and Yashar, D (2016) Parties, movements, and the making of democracy. In Bermeo, N and Yashar, D (eds), Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A (2000) To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Baltimore: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt5hjrrfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaydes, L (2010) Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, S and Lanoue, DJ (1992) Strategic and protest voting for third parties: the case of the Canadian NDP. Western Political Quarterly 45, 485–499.10.1177/106591299204500211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, J (2007) Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, VJ and Wolchik, SL (2010) Defeating dictators: electoral change and stability in competitive authoritarian regimes. World Politics 62, 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Y (2019) Protesters and tactical escalation. In Ma, N and Cheng, EW (eds), The Umbrella Movement. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, N (2013) Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. Environmental Politics 22, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X and Moss, DM (2019) Authoritarian regimes and social movements. In Snow, DA, Soule, SA, Kriesi, H and McCammon, HJ (eds), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 666–681.Google Scholar
Cheng, EW (2016) Street politics in a hybrid regime: the diffusion of political activism in post-colonial Hong Kong. The China Quarterly 226, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, EW (2020a) Movement leadership under a polycentric protest structure. In Gold, T and Veg, S (eds), Sunflowers and Umbrellas: Social Movements, Expressive Practices, and Political Culture in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
Cheng, EW (2020b) United front work and mechanisms of countermobilization in Hong Kong. The China Journal 83, 1–33.10.1086/706603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, D (2020) Protests as critical junctures: some reflections towards a momentous approach to social movements. Social Movement Studies 19, 556–575.10.1080/14742837.2018.1555458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, D, Fernandez, J, Kouki, H and Mosca, L (2017) Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fong, BCH (2014) Executive-Legislative disconnection in post-colonial Hong Kong: the dysfunction of the HKSAR's executive-dominant system, 1997–2012. China Perspectives 2014, 5–12.10.4000/chinaperspectives.6357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W (1975) The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J and Lust-Okar, E (2009) Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J (2004) More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields. Theory and Society 33, 333–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J and Tilly, C (2001) Threat (and opportunity): popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In Aminzade, RR, Goldstone, JA, McAdam, D, Perry, EJ, Sewell, WH, Tarrow, S and Tilly, C (eds), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–194.10.1017/CBO9780511815331.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, KF (2007) Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, MS (2019) 為什麼要佔領街頭？從太陽花、雨傘到反送中運動. Taipei: 左岸出版社.Google ScholarPubMed
Hui, V (2020) Beijing's hard and soft repression in Hong Kong. Orbis 64, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, W (2010) The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, S, Kriesi, H and Lorenzini, J (2018) Social movements in interaction with political parties. In Snow, DA, Soule, SA, Kriesi, H and McCammon, HJ (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 322–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeding, MP (2017) The rise of ‘localism’ in Hong Kong. Journal of Democracy 28, 157–171.10.1353/jod.2017.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, ME (1992) The Workers’ Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H (1988) Organization and strategy of Belgian and West German ecology parties: a new dynamic of party politics in Western Europe? Comparative Politics 20, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, B (1997) The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H (2004) Political context and opportunity. In Snow, DA, Soule, SA, Kriesi, H and McCammon, HJ (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H (2015) Party systems, electoral systems, and social movements. In Della Porta, D and Diani, M (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 667–680.Google Scholar
Ku, AS-M (2007) Constructing and contesting the ‘order’ imagery in Media discourse: implications for civil society in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication 17, 186–200.Google Scholar
Kwok, C and Chan, NK (2017) Legitimacy and forced democratisation in social movements. China Perspectives 2017, 7–16.10.4000/chinaperspectives.7375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langohr, V (2004) Too much civil society, too little politics: Egypt and Liberalizing Arab Regimes. Comparative Politics 36, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, FLF (2020) Solidarity in the anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies 52, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, FLF and Chan, JM (2018) Media and Protest Logics in the Digital Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190856779.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, FLF, Yuen, S, Tang, G and Cheng, EW (2019) Hong Kong's summer of uprising: from Anti-Extradition to Anti-Authoritarian protests. China Review 19, 1–32.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, SI (2006) Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, N (2009) Social movements and state-society relationship in Hong Kong. In Kuah-Pearce, KE and Guiheux, G (eds), Social Movements in China and Hong Kong, The Expansion of Protest Space. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
Ma, N (2011) Hong Kong's democrats divide. Journal of Democracy 22, 54–67.Google Scholar
Ma, N (2018) Party underdevelopment in Hong Kong. Asian Survey 58, 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, N (2019) Rude awakening new participants and the Umbrella Movement. In Ma, N and Cheng, EW (eds), The Umbrella Movement. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
Ma, N and Cheng, EW (eds) (2019) The Umbrella Movement: Civil Resistance and Contentious Space in Hong Kong. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D (1988) Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D and Sewell, WH (2001) It's about time: temporality in the study of social movements and revolutions. In Aminzade, RR, Goldstone, JA, McAdam, D, Perry, EJ, Sewell, WH, Tarrow, S and Tilly, C (eds), Silence and Voices in the Study of Contentious Politics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D and Tarrow, S (2010) Ballots and barricades: on the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics 8, 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D and Tarrow, S (2013) Social Movements and Elections: Toward a Broader Understanding of the Political Context of Contention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D, Tarrow, S and Tilly, C (2001) The Dynamics of Contention. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mok, CWJ (2020) Why and how umbrella movement participants ran in the authoritarian elections in Hong Kong. Asian Survey 60, 1142–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, B (2001) Doing Democracy: The MAP Model for Organizing Social Movements. Gabriola: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Myagkov, M, Ordeshook, PC and Shakin, D (2009) The Forensics of Election Fraud: Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachman, L (2020) From Sunflowers to suits: how spatial openings affect movement party formation. In Gold, T and Veg, S (eds), Sunflowers and Umbrellas: Social Movements, Expressive Practices, and Political Culture in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, pp. 200–227.Google Scholar
Ong, LH (2018) ‘Thugs-for-Hire’: subcontracting of state coercion and state capacity in China. Perspectives on Politics 16, 680–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, FF and Cloward, RA (1978) Poor People's Movements Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T (2002) Green parties in national governments: from protest to acquiescence? Environmental Politics 11, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G (2010) Throwing out the bums: protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism. World Politics 62, 221–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, WW and DiMaggio, PJ (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, GB (2011) The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, A (2002) Elections without democracy: the menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13, 36–50.10.1353/jod.2002.0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, A (2013) The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism, 1st Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, G and Cheng, EW (2021) Postmaterialism and the perceived quality of elections: a study of the moderation effect of a critical event. Social Indicators Research 155, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S (2011) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Trejo, G (2014) The ballot and the street: an electoral theory of social protest in autocracies. Perspectives on Politics 12, 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truong, N (2021) Opposition repertoires under authoritarian rule: Vietnam's 2016 self-nomination movement. Journal of East Asian Studies 21, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Antwerp, AC and Brown, NJ (2018) The electoral model without elections? The Arab uprisings of 2011 and the color revolutions in comparative perspective. Demokratizatsiya 26, 195–226.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, RE and Rosenstone, SJ (1980) Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, SH-W (2014) Resource disparity and multi-level elections in competitive authoritarian regimes: regression discontinuity evidence from Hong Kong. Electoral Studies 33, 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuen, S (2019) From repression to attrition state responses towards the Umbrella movement. In Ma, N and Cheng, EW (eds), The Umbrella Movement. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar