Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:13:08.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Does Blood Membership Mean in Political Terms?: The Political Incorporation of Latin American Nikkeijin (Japanese Descendants) (LAN) in Japan 1990–2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

MICHAEL ORLANDO SHARPE
MICHAEL ORLANDO SHARPE*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Behavioral Sciences, York College / City University of New York, School of Health and Behavioral [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This attempts to explain the limited political incorporation of Latin American Nikkeijin (Japanese descendants) (LAN) in Japan 1990–2004. A 1990 reform provides Nikkeijin a renewable visa that has enabled some 300,000 LAN to emigrate to Japan on the basis of Japanese blood descent or ethnicity.1 Long-term marginalized minority groups, such as Zainichi Koreans and Chinese,2 are comparatively better incorporated in Japan's political system and their demands increasingly recognized as more legitimate. I argue Japan's changing ethnic citizenship regime, political opportunity structure, and structure of civil society combined with LAN language difficulties, newness of residence, small size, low minority status, and powerful myth of return limits their immigrant political incorporation in Japan.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 2011 , pp. 113 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Following Max Weber, ethnicity is defined as ‘those human groups that entertain a subjective belief in their common descent because of similarities of physical type or of customs or both, or because of memories of colonization and migration; this belief must be important for the propagation of group formation; conversely, it does not matter whether or not an objective blood relation exists’. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus (eds.), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Volume 1 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978), p. 389Google Scholar.

2 According to the MOJ's Immigration Bureau in 2004 there were 607,419 Korean nationals, 487,570 Chinese nationals, and 199,394 Philippine nationals registered in Japan.

3 Tsuda, Takeyuki, ‘The Motivation to Migrate: The Ethnic and Sociocultural Constitution of the Japanese–Brazilian Return-Migration System’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 1 (October, 1999): 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ibid., p. 12; Tsuda, Takeyuki, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland: Japanese Brazilian Return Migration in Transnational Perspective (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003), p. xiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brody, Betsy, Opening the Door: Immigration, Ethnicity, and Globalization in Japan (New York: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar; Yamanaka, Keiko, ‘I will go home, but when?: Labor Migration and Circular Diaspora Formation by Japanese Brazilians in Japan’, in Douglass, Mike, and Roberts, Glenda S. (eds.), Japan and Global Migration: Foreign Workers and the Advent of a Multicultural Society (London and New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar; Takao, Yasuo, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan: Beneficiaries to Participants’, Asian Survey, 43, 3 (May/June, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Although Brazilian and Peruvian and other Latin American Nikkeijin are distinct groups with marked differences, they share the commonalities of being legal immigrants in Japan because of their Japanese ethnicity and have many of the same problems and challenges. Hence, they are treated together for the purposes of this paper.

6 Yamanaka, ‘I will go home, but when?; Brody, Opening the Door.

7 ‘2005 Immigration Control’, 11th Issue of the ‘Immigration Control Report’, Japan, Immigration Bureau, MOJ, Table 11, ‘Changes in the number of registered foreign nationals by nationality (place of origin)’, p. 30.

8 I define citizenship as legal membership that includes a broad range of civil, political, and social rights, i.e. in the ‘legal sense to designate the formal status of membership in a political community.’ Bosniak, Linda, ‘Denationalizing Citizenship’, in Aleinikoff, Alexander T. and Klusmeyer, Douglass (eds.), Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2001), pp. 240–1Google Scholar. As articulated by Castles and Davidson the ‘pivotal right is that of participation in law-making and government’, Castles, Stephen and Davidson, Alastair, Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging (New York: Routledge, 2000), p. viiGoogle Scholar. Nationality is defined here as belonging to a nation. The members of a nation lay claim to a clearly defined territory and not necessarily in biological terms. Sodaro, Michael J., Comparative Politics: A Global Introduction, third edition (New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008), p. 148Google Scholar. Following Sassen, I use the terms citizenship and nationality interchangeably, Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

9 ‘2005 Immigration Control’, 11th Issue of the ‘Immigration Control Report’, Japan, Immigration Bureau, MOJ, p. 27.

10 Political incorporation is defined here as both the formal (citizenship, naturalization, and voting) and informal (membership in non-governmental and community organizations and associations, etc.), means of participation in a given location, and the extent to which immigrants interests are reflected in political outcomes and policies. In Michael Jones-Correa, ‘Bringing Outsiders In: Questions of Immigrant Incorporation’, Paper prepared for the Conference on the Politics of Democratic Inclusion, University of Notre Dame (17–19 October 2002), p. 3.

11 Marshall, T. H., Citizenship and Social Class (London and Concord, MA: Pluto Press, 1992)Google Scholar; Salter, Frank (ed.), Welfare, Ethnicity and Altruism: New Findings and Evolutionary Theory (London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass Publishers, 2004)Google Scholar; Alesina, Alberto and Glaeser, Edward L., Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Yamanaka, ‘I will go home, but when?’; Brody, Opening the Door; Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland. Tsuda estimates the number of Nikkeijin with Japanese nationality in Japan at 10% and cites one survey from Cornelius, 1998 at 9% and another from the Japan Institute of Labor at 13%, Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland, p. 98.

13 Yamanaka, ‘I will go home, but when?’; Brody, Opening the Door; Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland.

14 Douglass, Mike and Roberts, Glenda S. (eds.), Japan and Global Migration: Foreign Workers and the Advent of a Multicultural Society (London and New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar; Brody, Opening the Door; Hirabayashi, Lane, Ryo, and Kikumyra-Yano, Akemi, and Hirabayashi, James A., New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan (California: Stanford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

15 Tsuda, ‘The Motivation to Migrate’; Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland; Brody, Opening the Door; Yamanaka, ‘I will go home, but when?’; Takao, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan’; Roth, Joshua Hotaka, Brokered Homeland: Japanese Brazilian Migrants in Japan (Cornell University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

16 Peng-Er argues that Japan is a liberal democracy because it has regular national and local elections, competitive political parties, a free and active media, academic freedom, and civil society organizations. Lam Peng-Er, ‘At the Margins of a Liberal-Democratic State: Ethnic Minorities in Japan’, in Kymlicka, Wil and He, Baogang, Multiculturalism in Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 223–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Miller, Mark J., ‘Political Participation and Representation of Noncitizens’, in Brubaker, William Rogers (ed.), Immigration and Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America (Lanham: University Press of America, 1989)Google Scholar.

18 Significant parts of the Zainichi Korean and Chinese oldcomer communities are descendants of former Japanese colonial subjects.

19 Gellner, Ernest, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

20 Hobsbawn, E. J., Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

21 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, revised edition (Verso: New York, 1991)Google Scholar.

22 Brubaker, William Rogers, Ethnicity Without Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Reischauer, Edwin O. and Jansen, Marius B., The Japanese Today: Challenge and Continuity, enlarged edition (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1995), pp. 395–6Google Scholar.

24 Komai, Hiroshi, Foreign Migrants in Contemporary Japan, translated by Wilkinson, Jens (Melbourne, Australia: Trans Pacific Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

25 Lie, John, Multiethnic Japan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Komai, Foreign Migrants in Contemporary Japan, pp. 96,13.

27 Lie, Multiethnic Japan, p. 112.

28 Kashiwazaki, Chikako, ‘Citizenship in Japan: Legal Practice and Contemporary Development’, in Alexander, Aleinikoff T. and Klusmeyer, Douglas (eds.), From Migrants to Citizens: Membership in a Changing World (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2000), p. 439Google Scholar.

29 Komai, Foreign Migrants in Contemporary Japan, pp. 14–15.

30 Lie, Multiethnic Japan, p. 134.

31 Kashiwazaki, ‘Citizenship in Japan’, p. 436; Lie, Multiethnic Japan.

32 Buraku people or Burakumin (min refers to people) are generally recognized as “descendants of outcaste like minority among the ethnic Japanese”. From website of the Buraku Liberation League: http://www.bll.gr.jp/eng.html.

33 Foreign population just reaching about 1% in the early 1990s. Peng-Er, ‘At the Margins of a Liberal-Democratic State’, p. 225.

34 It is ironic that in the midst of the global financial crisis in 2009, the Japanese government established a program for the paid voluntary repatriation of unemployed Latin American Nikkeijin Kikoku Shien Jigyo (Help Return Program).

35 Kashiwazaki, ‘Citizenship in Japan’.

36 Ibid.

37 Ibid.

38 Tsuda, ‘The Motivation to Migrate’, p. 12.

39 Ibid, p. 10.

40 Junichi Goto, ‘Latin American of Japanese Origin (Nikkeijin) Working in Japan – A Survey’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4203, April 2007.

41 Both Surak (2008) and Urano and Yamamoto cite Kajita et al.'s (2005) discussion of this. Kristin Surak ‘Convergence in Foreigners' Rights and Citizenship Policies? A Look at Japan’, International Migration Review, (Autumn 2008), p. 561. Urano, Edson and Yamamoto, Lucia “Social and Economic Support among Migrants and Families Left Behind in Transnational Contexts', International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS), 10, 2 (2008), p. 224Google Scholar. Kajita, T., Tanno, K., and Higuchi, N.Kao no Mienai Teijuka – Nikkei Burajirujin to Kokka Shijo Imin Nettowaaku. (Nagoya: Nagoya Daigaku Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

42 Brody, Opening the Door.

43 Tsuda, ‘The Motivation to Migrate’, p. 12; Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland, p. xii.

44 Yamanaka, Keiko, ‘New Immigration Policy and Unskilled Foreign Workers in Japan’, Pacific Affairs, 66, 1 (Spring, 1993): 72–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Tsuda, ‘The Motivation to Migrate’, pp. 11–12.

46 Keiko Yamanaka, ‘I will go home, but when?’, p. 140

47 ‘2005 Immigration Control’, 11th Issue of the ‘Immigration Control Report’, Japan, Immigration Bureau. MOJ, p. 30, http://www.moj.go.jp/ENGLISH/IB/ib-01.html

48 Ibid., p. 27.

49 Brubaker, William Rogers, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992)Google Scholar; Coleman, Jules L., and Harding, Sarah K., ‘Citizenship, the Demands of Justice and the Moral Relevance of Political Borders’, in Schwartz, Warren (ed.), Justice in Immigration (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Kashiwazaki, ‘Citizenship in Japan’; Joppke, Christian, Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2005)Google Scholar. Brubaker and Coleman and Harding distinguish ‘ethnic citizenship’ and ‘civic citizenship’ regime types and their linkages with national ideology and state policy. A ‘civic citizenship’ regime is characterized by a jus soli and more open naturalization policy towards its immigrant populations. Although some have criticized these citizenship regime types and their connections with civic vs. ethnic definitions of nationhood as overly simplistic in so far as they ignore that all nations have both civic and ethnic qualities and may provide equal access to citizenship (Kashiwazaki, ‘Citizenship in Japan’; Joppke, Selecting by Origin), I argue this still applies in the case of Japan.

50 Rogers Brubaker, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany.

51 Zolberg, Aristide R., in Aleinikoff, T. Alexander and Klusmeyer, Douglas (eds.), From Migrants to Citizens: Membership in a Changing World (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2000), p. 383Google Scholar.

52 Kashiwazaki, ‘Citizenship in Japan’.

53 Tsuda, Takeyuki, ‘Localities and the Struggle for Immigrant Rights: The Significance of Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration’, in Tsuda, Takeyuki (ed.), Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books., 2006), p. 18Google Scholar.

54 Reischauer and Jansen, The Japanese Today, pp. 395–6.

55 Interview with MOJ's Immigration Office, 1 August 2006.

56 Interview with MOJ's Immigration Office, 1 August 2006.

57 Interview with Consulate General of Brazil in Tokyo Official, 1 August 2006.

58 Interview with Kawasaki International Association Official, 21 August 2006.

59 Interview with Japanese NGO Official Toyota City, 25 July 2006.

60 Interview with Brazilian Nikkei catholic priest, 26 July 2006.

61 Gellner, Nations and Nationalism, p. 7.

62 Interview with Brazilian Nikkeijin community member, 31 July 2006.

63 Tsuda, ‘Localities and the Struggle for Immigrant Rights’, p. 21.

64 Takao, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan’, p. 542.

65 Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland, p. 98.

66 Kashiwazaki, ‘Citizenship in Japan’, p. 444.

67 Interview with Brazilian Nikkei catholic priest, 26 July 2006.

68 Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland, p. x.

69 Doug Struck, ‘Were Talking about Apartheid: Expat Brings American-style Human Rights Fight to Japan’, in The Japan Times (16 July 2003), p. 15, reprinted from the Washington Post/Los Angeles Times.

70 Yamanaka, ‘I will go home, but when?

71 Tarrow defines political opportunity structure as ‘consistent - but not necessarily formal or permanent – dimensions of the political environment that provide incentives for people to undertake collective action by affecting their expectations for success or failure’ and notes the possible changes in political opportunity structure as ‘the opening up of access to participation, shifts in ruling alignments, the availability of influential allies, and cleavages within and among elites’. Tarrow, Sidney G., Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 86Google Scholar. I use the term similarly to Pekkanen, Robert, Japan's Dual Civil Society: Members Without Advocates (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 19–20Google Scholar.

72 Up until recently, Japan was governed by the LDP from the time of the party's founding in 1955 with its sole loss being in the 1993 election. See discussion of one party systems in Pempel, T. J. (ed.), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1990), pp. 3–4Google Scholar.

73 Joppke, Christian, ‘Citizenship within de and re-ethnicization’, Archives Européennes de sociologie, 44, 3 (2003): 301–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Milly, Deborah J., ‘Policy Advocacy for Foreign Residents in Japan’, in Tsuda, Takeyuki (ed.), Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books., 2006), pp. 127, 128Google Scholar.

75 Prior to the 1995 electoral reform, the Japanese system was a multi-seat medium-sized constituency election system. The reform attempted to create a competitive two party system and more efficient government. As discussed in Norris, Pippa, Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76 Neary, Ian, The State and Politics in Japan (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2002), p. 138Google Scholar.

77 Dean Collingwood, ‘Japan’, in Sodaro, Michael J., Comparative Politics: A Global Introduction, third edition (New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008), p. 577Google Scholar.

78 Lijphart, Arend, The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Lijphart, Arend, ‘Consociational Democracy’, World Politics, 21 (1969): 207–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lijphart, Arend, Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty Seven Democracies 1945–1990 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

79 Interview with Member of House of Councillors, 4 August 2006.

80 Ogai, Tokuko, ‘Japanese Women and Political Institutions: Why are Women Politically Underrepresented?’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 34, 2 (2001): 208Google Scholar.

81 Taro Karasaki, ‘2004 Upper House Election: Parties play up “international” side to reflect changes in domestic policy’, 1 July 2004, World News, http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view.pl?archive=56&num=9725&printer=1/.

82 Cited from The Japan Times, 21 May 2004, http://www.100scooter.com/AsiaPacificMediaNetworkJAidat.htm.

83 Interview with Member of the House of Representatives, 20 July 2006. Also referred to in Nakata Hiroko, ‘Koizumi apologizes to emigrants: Dominican Republic settlers to paradise lie draws regrets’, The Japan Times, 22 July 2006, p. 2.

84 Pak, Katherine Tegtmeyer, ‘Cities and Local Citizenship in Japan: Overcoming Nationality’, in Tsuda, Takeyuki (ed.), Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books., 2006)Google Scholar.

85 ‘Voting rights legislation hit by Congryun brass’, The Japan Times 14 October 2000, http://search.japantimes.co.jp/print/nn20001014a7.html.

86 Hiroshi Matsubara, ‘Opponents sidetrack suffrage debate: conservatives take advantage of divided Koreans, push naturalization’, The Japan Times, 1 December 2000, http://search.japantimes.co.jp/print/nn2001201b4.html.

87 Interview with Member of House of Councillors, 18 July 2006.

88 Interview with Former Tokyo Immigration Official and Head of Policy Think Tank, 12 July 2006.

89 Takao, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan’, pp. 548–50.

90 Akemi Nakmura, ‘Suffrage for foreigners gain momentum, Diet to take up bill on local voting rights, but LDP is dragging its feet’, The Japan Times, 10 November 2004, http://www.search.japantimes.co.jp/print/nn20041110f1.html.

91 Suvendrini Kakuchi, ‘Japan at odds on voting right for foreign residents’, Asia Times Online, 22 November 2000, http:///www.attimes.com/japan-econ/BK22Dh01.html.

92 Taro Karasaki, ‘2004 Upper House Election: Parties play up ‘international'side to reflect changes in domestic policy’, World News, 1 July 2004, http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view.pl?archive=56&num=9725&printer=1/.

93 Network for Human Rights Legislation for Foreigners and Ethnic Minorities, ‘A Human Rights Report on Foreigners and Ethnic Minorities Living in Japan 2006’ (Tokyo, Japan), p. 42.

94 While the number of registered foreign nationals with ‘Spouse of Child of Japanese National’ decreased in 2004, the number of those with ‘Spouse of Child of Permanent Resident’ increased every year from 2000 to 2004 as the number of permanent residents increased. ‘2005 Immigration Control’, 11th Issue of the ‘Immigration Control Report’, Japan, Immigration Bureau, MOJ, pp. 34–5.

95 Interview with Kawasaki International Association official, 21 August 2006.

96 Interview with Japanese NGO official, 8/4/06.

97 Pak, Katherine Tegtmeyer, ‘Foreigners are local citizens, too: local governments respond to international migration in Japan’, in Douglass, Mike, and Roberts, Glenda S. (eds.), Japan and Global Migration: Foreign Workers and the Advent of a Multicultural Society (London and New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar; Pak, ‘Cities and Local Citizenship in Japan’, p. 80.

98 Neary, The State and Politics in Japan.

99 Takao, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan’.

100 Pak, ‘Foreigners are local citizens, too’, p. 259.

101 Brody, Opening the Door, p. 108.

102 It is also possible that a consideration of suffrage for those on the teiujusha (long-term residence) visa may be someday demanded and considered.

103 Carens, Joseph H., ‘Membership and Morality: Admission to Citizenship in Liberal Democratic States’, Brubaker, William Rogers (ed.), Immigration and Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America (Lanham: University Press of America, 1989)Google Scholar.

104 Pharr, Susan, State of Japan's Civil Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 318Google Scholar.

105 Pak, ‘Foreigners are local citizens, too’, p. 268.

106 Shipper, Apichai, Fighting for Foreigners: Immigration and its Impact on Japanese Democracy (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2008), pp. 60–1Google Scholar.

107 Yasuo Takao, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan’, p. 547.

108 Yamanaka, Keiko, ‘Immigrant Incorporation and Women's Community Activities in Japan: Local NGOs and Public Education for Immigrant Children’, in Tsuda, Takeyuki (ed.), Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books., 2006)Google Scholar.

109 Yamanaka, ‘Immigrant Incorporation and Women's Community Activities in Japan’, p. 100.

110 Goto, ‘Latin American of Japanese Origin’.

111 Shipper, Apichai, ‘The Political Construction of Foreign Workers in Japan’, Critical Asian Studies, 34, 1 (2002): 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shipper, Apichai, ‘Foreigners in Japan’, Pacific Affairs, 79, 2 (Summer 2006): 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112 Urano, Edson I. and Stewart, Paul, ‘Including the Excluded Workers? The Challenges of Kanagawa City Union’, Working USA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 10 (March 2007): 103–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 Shipper, ‘The Political Construction of Foreign Workers in Japan’, p. 20; Tsuda, ‘Localities and the Struggle for Immigrant Rights’, p. 26; Shipper, ‘Foreigners in Japan’, p. 277; Shipper, Fighting for Foreigners.

114 Takao, ‘Foreigners’ Rights in Japan’, p. 544.

115 Shipper, ‘The Political Construction of Foreign Workers in Japan’.

116 Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland.

117 Brody, Opening the Door.

118 Tsuda, Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland, p. 235.

119 As referred to in Shipper, Fighting for Foreigners, p. 92. The Catholic Bishops Conference of Japan notes some 406,974 foreign born Catholics in 2000, http://www.cbcj.catholic.jp/jpn/data/00data.htm (accessed 8/2/10).

120 Pekkanen, Japan's Dual Civil Society.

121 Ibid., pp. 2–3.

122 Pharr, State of Japan's Civil Society.

123 Pekkanen, Japan's Dual Civil Society.

124 Ibid.

125 Ibid.

126 Shipper, ‘Foreigners in Japan’.

127 Shipper, Fighting for Foreigners, p. 195.

128 Pekkanen, Japan's Dual Civil Society.

129 Shipper, ‘Foreigners in Japan’.

130 Ibid. pp. 270–1.

131 Interview with long-term resident and foreign community activist, 14 July 2006.

132 Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Use of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois, 1964, 1970, fourth printing)Google Scholar

133 Cornelius, Wayne A., Martin, Philip L., and Hollifield, James F., Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994), p. 3Google Scholar.