Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:37:27.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of Political Trust in East Asian Democracies: Psychological, Cultural, and Institutional Arguments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

EUNJUNG CHOI  and
JONGSEOK WOO
EUNJUNG CHOI
Affiliation:
University of South [email protected]
JONGSEOK WOO
Affiliation:
University of South [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the importance of social and political trust has been well documented, there is a lack of scholarly consensus over where trust originates. This article tests three theoretical arguments – social-psychological, social-cultural, and political institutional – on the origin of political trust against three East Asian democracies (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The empirical analysis from the AsiaBarometer survey illustrates that political institutional theory best explains the origin of political trust in East Asian cases. Citizens of these East Asian democracies have a high level of political trust when they believe that their governments perform well in management of the national economy and political representation of elected officials. Meanwhile, social-psychological and social-cultural theories explain the origins of social trust, but not political trust. The evidence reveals that socially trusting people are not automatically politically trusting; social trust and political trust originate from different sources and do not transform from one to the other.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 410 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AsiaBarometer (2006), https://www.asiabarometer.org/.Google Scholar
Bandfield, Edward C. (1958), The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Bernard (1983), The Logic and Limits of Trust, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Canache, Damarys and Allison, Michael E (2005), ‘Perceptions of Corruption in Latin American Democracies’, Latin American Politics and Society, 47 (3): 91–111.Google Scholar
Chang, Eric C. C. and Chu, Yun-han (2006), ‘Corruption and Trust: Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies?’, Journal of Politics, 68 (2): 259–71.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel J., Huntington, Samuel P., and Watanuki, Joji (1975), The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Delhey, Jan and Newton, Kenneth (2003), ‘Who Trusts?: The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Societies’, European Societies, 5 (2): 93–137.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella (2000), ‘Social Capital, Beliefs in Government, and Political Corruption’, in Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert (eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling with the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan, and Lipset, Seymour Martin (eds.) (1989), Politics in Developing Countries, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik H. (1950), Childhood and Society, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (1995), Trust, Social Virtues and the Creation of Property, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. (1998), ‘The Political Relevance of Political Trust’, American Political Science Review, 92 (4): 791–808.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1999), ‘Trust, Well-Being and Democracy’, in Warren, Mark (ed.), Democracy and Trust, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (2000), ‘Trust, Well-Being and Democracy’, in Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert (eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling with the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaase, Max (1999), ‘Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-Institutionalised Political Participation in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 22 (3): 1–21.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji-young (2005), ‘“Bowling Together” Isn't a Cure-All: The Relationship between Social Capital and Political Trust in South Korea’, International Political Science Review, 26 (2): 193–213.Google Scholar
Kramer, Roderick M. (1999) ‘Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions’, Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 569–598.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio, Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei, Shleifer, and Robert, Vishny (1997), ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’, Journal of Finance 52 (3): 1113–1155.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert (2000), ‘Investor Protection and Corporate Governance’, Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret (1996), ‘Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work’, Politics and Society, 24 (1): 45–55.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi and Wilson, Carole J (2007), ‘Why Do Corrupt Governments Maintain Public Support?’, Comparative Political Studies, 40 (8): 949–70.Google Scholar
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard (2001), ‘What Are the Origins of Political Trust?: Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies’, Comparative Political Studies, 34 (1): 30–62.Google Scholar
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard (2005), ‘What Are the Political Consequences of Trust?: A Test of Cultural and Institutional Theories in Russia’, Comparative Political Studies, 38 (9): 1050–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Stephen D. and Klesner, Joseph L. (2010), ‘Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Mexico’, Comparative Political Studies, 43 (10): 1258–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Kenneth (1999), ‘Social and Political Trust in Established Democracies’, in Norris, Pippa (ed.), Critical Citizens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Kenneth and Norris, Pippa (2000), ‘Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance?’, in Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert (eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling with the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Kenneth (2001) ‘Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy’, International Political Science Review 22 (2): 201–214.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2013), Government at a Glance 2013, 14 November, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2013-en) Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1995), ‘Tuning in, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 28 (4): 664–83.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian (eds.) (1998), Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Milton J. (1956) ‘Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Affect’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53 (3): 367–372.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, and Dietlind, Stolle (2002), ‘How Political Institutions Create and Destroy Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust’, A Paper Delivered at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston MA, August 29-September 2.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc F. (eds.) (1999), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Schoon, Ingrid and Cheng, Helen (2011), ‘Determinants of Political Trust: A Lifetime Learning Model’, Developmental Psychology, 47 (3): 619–31.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. (1962), ‘Party Loyalty and the Likelihood of Deviating Elections’, Journal of Politics 24 (4): 689–702.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (2003) Democracy in America, 13th Ed., New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. (1999) ‘Democracy and Social Capital’, in Warren, Mark (ed.), Democracy and Trust, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. (2000), ‘Is the Senate More Civil Than the House?' in Loomis, Burdett (ed.), Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the Senate, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. (2002), The Moral Foundations of Trust, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. (2005), ‘Trust and Corruption’, in Lambsdorf, Johann Graff, Taube, Markus, and Schramm, Matthias (eds.), The New Institutional Economics of Corruption, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar