Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T12:52:53.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Leadership and International Regime: Empirical Testing of Cooperation without Hegemony Paradigm on the Basis of 120 Multilateral Conventions Data Deposited to the United Nations System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

LIEN THI QUYNH LE ,
YOSHIKI MIKAMI  and
TAKASHI INOGUCHI
LIEN THI QUYNH LE
Affiliation:
Nagaoka University of Technology
YOSHIKI MIKAMI
Affiliation:
Nagaoka University of Technology
TAKASHI INOGUCHI
Affiliation:
University of Niigata Prefecture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study is an attempt to construct a quantitative link for international regimes with global leadership. The country's willingness to lead in solving global issues as the first mover in the formation of an international regime is measured and characterized by analyzing their ratification behavior in multilateral conventions deposited to the United Nations which shape ‘the rules of the game’ of the global community. For this purpose, a set of quantitative indicators, the Index of Global Leadership Willingness and the Global Support Index, was defined and calculated for each country based on its actual ratification year data for 120 multilateral conventions covering global issues such as peace and security, environment, commerce, communication, intellectual property protection, human rights, and labor. By proposing a framework of global leadership analysis, the study seeks to provide an empirical testing of the transformation of global governance towards cooperation without hegemony paradigm. The paper analyses changes in the leadership willingness indices of selected country groups, such as the G3, G7/8, and G20, over the century and finds that the will to drive the international agenda of these groups of leaders is in decline. Moreover, our study provides evidence to argue that our current world is actually without consistent global leadership across domains of the world affairs. Although several countries still show visible leadership in specific policy domains, such as environment and intellectual property, neither the G7/8 nor the G20 was playing a comparable role to those performed by the G3 a hundred years ago.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 523 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alleyne, Mark Dacosta (2004), ‘International Communication and World Affairs’, in Luthra, Rashmi (ed.), Journalism and Mass Communication, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Alli, Benjamin O. (2008), Fundamental Principles of Occupational Health and Safety, 2nd edn, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Anttiroiko, A.V. (2004), ‘New Principles of Governance in the Global Age’, in Tummala, Krishna K. (ed.), Public Administration and Public Policy, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard E. and Martin, Philippe (1999), Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 6904, January 1999.Google Scholar
Barker, J. Craig (2004), ‘Mechanisms To Create and Support Conventions, Treaties, and Other Responses’, in Kutting, Gabriela Maria (ed.), Conventions, Treaties and other Responses to Global Issues, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Baskerville, David (2006), Music Business Handbook and Career Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 542−6.Google Scholar
Boemeke, Manfred F., Feldman, Gerald D., and Boemeke, Elisabeth (1998), The Treaty of Versailles: 75 Years After, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John and Peter, Drahos (2000), Global Business Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Ian and Nouriel Roubini (2011), ‘A G-Zero World: The New Economic Club Will Produce Conflict, Not Cooperation’, Foreign Affairs, 90(2, March/April).Google Scholar
Bremmer, Ian (2012), Every Nation for Itself: Winners and Losers in a G-Zero World, New York: Portfolio (Penguin Group).Google Scholar
Brown, Drusilla K. (2001), ‘Labor Standards: Where Do They Belong on the International Trade Agenda?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3: 89−112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. and Joseph F. Turcotte (2012) ‘Cultural, Political, and Social Implications of Intellectual Property Laws in an Informational Economy’, in UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee (eds.), Culture, Civilization and Human Society, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (nd), http://www.coe.int/T/DG1/LegalCooperation/Economiccrime/cybercrime/default_en.asp.Google Scholar
Council on Foreign Relations (2013), The Global Human Rights Regime, http://www.cfr.org/human-rights/global-human-rights-regime/p27450.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce (2009), Dominion from Sea to Sea, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fast, Larissa A. (2004), ‘Peace and Security’, in Marquardt, Michael J. (ed.), Human Resource Management, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Flemes, Daniel (2007), Conceptualising Regional Power in International Relations: Lessons from the South African Case, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA) Working Paper No. 53.Google Scholar
French, H. (2004), ‘The Role of The United Nations in Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development’, in Murphy, Irene Lyons (ed.), Democratic Global Governance, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Gillis, Melissa (2009), Disarmament – A Basic Guide, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1983) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas, Held, David, and Young, Kevin (2013), Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation is Failing when We Need It Most, 1st edn, Cambridge: Polity Publisher.Google Scholar
IAEA (nd), IAEA Safeguards Overview: Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols, International Atomic Energy Agency Publications, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/sg_overview.html.sGoogle Scholar
IAEA (1970), Full Text of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, International Atomic Energy Agency Publications, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/infcirc140.pdf.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John (2011), Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American System, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
International Labour Office (2002), The International Labour Organization's Fundamental Conventions, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/publication/wcms_095895.pdf.Google Scholar
Interpol (nd), Cybercrime, http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Cybercrime/Cybercrime.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, 1st edn., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1982), ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, International Organization 36, 2, Spring. Reprinted in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. (2013), No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Reprint edition.Google Scholar
Landes, David (1999), The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Margaret (2003), Paris 1919 − Six Months that Changed the World, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mari, Luca (2012), ‘Measurement Science and Its Evolution’, in UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee (eds.), Physical Methods, Instruments and Measurements, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Modelski, George and William R. Thompson (1988), Sea Power in Global Politics, 1494−1993, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moschini, Gian Carlo (2004), ‘Patents and other Intellectual Property Rights’, in Azzeddine, M. Azzam (ed.), Public Policy in Food and Agriculture, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Daniel (2006), ‘International Treaties against Terrorism and the Use of Terrorism During Armed Conflict and by Armed Forces’, International Review of the Red Cross, 88 (864).Google Scholar
Obijiofor, Aginam (1969), Global Health Governance: International Law and Public Health in a Divided World, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, p.51.Google Scholar
Puchala, Donald J. and Hopkins, Raymond F. (1982), ‘International Regimes: Lessons from Inductive Analysis’, International Organization, 36 (2) International Regimes, pp. 245−75.Google Scholar
Rachman, Gideon (2011), Zero-Sum Future: American Power in an Age of Anxiety, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Safadi, Raed (2004), ‘Policy-Making in a Globalising World Economy’, in Sirageldin, Ismail (ed.), Sustainable Human Development, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart (2002), Governing Global Finance, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony, Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, Cambridge: Polity, pp. 189−208.Google Scholar
Schwabach, Aaron (2004/Rev.2006), ‘International Environmental Law’, in Schwabach, Aaron and Cockfield, Arthur John, International Law and Institutions, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. (2002), ‘Intellectual Property Rights’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony, Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, Cambridge: Polity, pp. 171−88.Google Scholar
Smis, Stefaan (2004), ‘Human Rights Treaties and Agreements’, in Schwabach, Aaron, and Cockfield, Arthur John (eds.), The Role of International Law and Institutions, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Sucharitkul, Sompong (2004), ‘The Nature and Sources of International Development Law’, in Maniruzzaman, A. F. Munir (ed.), Some Aspects of International Development Law, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Sweet, William (2005), ‘Human Rights, in Government and Politics’, in Sekiguchi, Masashi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R., Colerasi, Michael, and Rasler, Karen (2007), Strategic Rivalry, Space, Position, and Conflict Escalation in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tiefenbrun, Susan (2004), ‘Business and Trade Law’, in Schwabach, Aaron and Cockfield, Arthur John (eds.), Law, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
United Nations (nd), United Nations Charter, https://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/.Google Scholar
United Nations (1956), United Nations Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/SlaveryConvention.aspx.Google Scholar
United Nations (2014), United Nation Action to Counter Terrorisms, http://www.un.org/en/terrorism/instruments.shtml.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1999), Economic Instruments for the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources, New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2007), Trade-related Measures and Multilateral Environmental Agreements, http://www.unep.ch/etb/areas/pdf/MEA%20Papers/TradeRelated_MeasuresPaper.pdf.Google Scholar
Varfis, Catherine-Zoi and Wilson, Lorna M. (2004), ‘International Agreements’, in Kutting, Gabriessla Maria (ed.), Conventions, Treaties and other Responses to Global Issues, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.Google Scholar
Williams, Jody (1999), The International Campaign to Ban Landmines − A Model for Disarmament Initiatives, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1997/article.html?print=1#.U0b6mlU9gTs.Google Scholar