Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:29:35.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sovereignty, Political Authority, and Gridlock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

DAVID HELD
DAVID HELD*
Affiliation:
Master of University College, Durham and Professor of Politics and International Relations at Durham [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article examines the impact of the growth of multilateral and transnational governance on sovereignty and the diffusion of political authority. It begins by exploring the legacy of World War II and the building of the UN system. The rise of intergovernmentalism and transnational governance arrangements is examined followed by an assessment of some of the leading changes in the postwar global politics landscape. These issues are explored in greater depth across two cases: security and the environment. The article then examines a set of trends which can be characterized as a gridlock in leading institutions, and highlights the political uncertainty ahead at the global level.

Type
Special Issue Articles: Whither Multilateralism?
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 414 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hobsbawm, E., Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914–1991, London: Michael Joseph, 1994, p. 52.Google Scholar

2 McNeill, W., The Pursuit of Power, Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, p. 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 UN Charter, Chapter I, Article I.

4 Bull, H., The Anarchical Society, London: Macmillan, 1977, p. 6;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHeld, D., Democracy in the Global Order, Cambridge: Policy Press, 1995, p. 4.Google Scholar

5 Cassese, A., ‘Violence, War and the Rule of Law in the International Community’, in Held, D. (ed.), Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.Google Scholar

6 Hale, T., Held, D., and Young, K., Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.Google Scholar

7 Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J., Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.Google Scholar

8 Union of International Associations, Yearbook of International Organizations, Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

9 Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1977;Google ScholarSlaughter, A.-M., A New World Order, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

10 Büthe, T., ‘Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review’, Business and Politics, 3 (12) (2010).Google Scholar

11 Milner, H., Interests, Institutions and Information, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997; and Slaughter, A.-M., A New World Order.Google Scholar

12 Haas, P. M., ‘Policy Responses to Stratospheric Ozone Depletion’, Global Environmental Change, 1 (3) (1991): 224–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K., Activists Beyond Borders, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

13 Held, D. and Young, K., ‘Crisis in Parallel Worlds: The Governance of Global Risks in Finance, Security, and the Environment’, in Calhoun, C. and Derluguian, G. (eds.), The Deepening Crisis: Governance Challenges after Neoliberalism, New York, NY: New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

14 Held, D. and Hale, T. (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011Google Scholar; Betsill, M. M. and Corell, E. (eds.), NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organization in International Environmental Negotiations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar

15 Risse-Kappen, T., Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

16 Kerwer, D., ‘Rules That Many Use: Standards and Global Regulation’, Governance, 18 (4) (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H., The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Held and Hale (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance.

19 Held and Hale (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance.

20 Held and Young, ‘Crisis in Parallel Worlds.

21 J. Hanefield, ‘The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Malaria, and Tuberculosis’, in Held and Hale (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance; M. Koenig-Archibugi, ‘Global Polio Eradication Initiative’, in Held and Hale (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance.

22 Büthe, T., The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

23 Hale, T. and Held, D., ‘Gridlock and Innovation in Global Governance: The Partial Transnational Solution’, Global Policy, 2 (3) (2012).Google Scholar

24 Keohane, R. O., ‘Governance in a partially globalized world’, American Political Science Review, 1 (95) (2001).Google Scholar

25 Ikenberry, G. J., After Victory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Risse, T., ‘Let's Argue: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization, 1 (54) (2000).Google Scholar

27 Taylor, J., Global Financial Warriors: The Untold Story of International Finance in the Post-9/11 World, London: Norton, 2007Google Scholar; Tsingou, E., ‘Global Financial Governance and the Developing Anti-Money Laundering Regime: What Lessons for International Political Economy?’, International Politics, 6 (47) (2010).Google Scholar

28 O. Bowcott, ‘Drone Strikes Threaten 50 Years of International Law, Says UN Rapporteur’, The Guardian, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/21/drone-strikes-international-law-un?newsfeed=true.

29 Q. Nauman, ‘Pakistan Condemns US Drone Strikes’, Reuters, 2012, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/04/us-pakistan-usa-drones-idUSBRE8530MS20120604.

30 See D. Held and K. McNally, Lessons from Intervention in the 21st Century: Legality, Feasibility and Legitimacy, Global Policy e-book, 2015.

31 D. Held et al., Global Transformations.

32 R. O. Keohane and D. G. Victor, ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’, Discussion Paper 2010-33, Harvard Project on International Climate Change Agreements, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2010; T. Hale, ‘A Climate Coalition of the Willing’, Washington Quarterly, Winter 2011.

33 Lutsey, N. and Sperling, D., ‘America's Bottom-up Climate Change Mitigation Policy’, Energy Policy, 2 (36) (2008).Google Scholar

34 Au, B.et al., Beyond a Global Deal: A UN+ Approach to Climate Governance, Berlin: Global Governance 2020, 2011.Google Scholar