Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:49:12.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Policy with Bureaucrats and Experts: The Dilemma of Citizen Members in the Participatory Pension Reforms in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2016

SUNIL KIM
SUNIL KIM*
Affiliation:
College of International Studies, Kyung Hee University, South [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Documenting how the Japanese state responded to increasing social discontent during initiation of unpopular welfare reforms, this study examines the factors that hindered the political empowerment of civil society despite the timely introduction of participatory policymaking institutions. The Japanese government opted in the early 2000s to introduce a participatory method to initiate the unpopular pension reform. Deliberation councils were established to encourage open discussions among government policymakers and committee members, including citizen representatives. The final outcomes of the deliberations, however, were mostly about parametric adjustments and did not adequately consider the urgent demand of the general public. The participatory measure did not significantly improve the public's trust in the pension programs, but it did justify the government's reform initiatives. The welfare bureaucracy that set the goal, defined the scope of the agenda, and steered the discussions toward technical issues structurally restricted the voices of the citizen members in the deliberation councils. The lack of citizen advocacy groups, which could otherwise have effectively supported the citizen members on the committee, contributed to the limited roles and influences of the citizens. It is argued that the traditional conservative corporatism of Japan was reinforced during this time period, despite the introduction of the idea of participatory governance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 278 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avenell, Simon A. (2010), ‘Facilitating Spontaneity: The State and Independent Volunteering in Contemporary Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 13 (1): 69–93.Google Scholar
Campbell, John Creighton (1989), ‘Bureacratic Primacy: Japanese Policy Communities in an American Perspective’, Governance, 2 (1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Campbell, John Creighton (1996), ‘Media and Policy Change in Japan’, in Pharr, Susan J. and Krauss, Ellis S. (eds.), Media and Politics in Japan, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Democartic Party of Japan (DPJ) (2009), ‘Minshūtō no Seiken Seisaku, Manifesto 2009’ [DPJ's regime policies], 27 July.Google Scholar
El-Agraa, Ali M. (2009), ‘The Japanese Pensions Scandals’, Pensions, 14 (3): 191–201.Google Scholar
Estévez-Abe, Margarita (2002), ‘Negotiating Welfare Reforms: Actors and Institutions in the Japanese Welfare State’, in Rothstein, Bo and Steinmo, Sven (eds.), Restructuring the Welfare State, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Estévez-Abe, Margarita (2008), Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Estienne, Jean-François and Murakami, Kiyoshi (2000), ‘The Japanese Experience of Review and Reform of Public Pension Schemes’, in Reynaud, Emmanuel (ed.), Social Dialogue and Pension Reform, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon and Write, Erik Olin (2001), ‘Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance’, Politics and Society, 29 (1): 5–41.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon (1998), Molding Japanese Mind: The State in Everyday Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Koichi, Shinohara, Chika, and Broadbent, Jeffrey P. (2007), ‘The Effects of “Social Expectation” on the Development of Civil Society in Japan’, Journal of Civil Society, 3 (2): 179–203.Google Scholar
Imada, Makoto (2010), ‘Civil Society in Japan: Democracy, Voluntary Action, and Philanthropy’, in Vinken, Henket al. (eds.), Civic Engagement in Contemporary Japan, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Institute of Population and Social Security Research (IPSSR) (2007), Heisei 17-nendo Shakai Hoshō Kyūhuhi [Social Security Expenditure in 2005], Tokyo: Kokuritsu Shakaihoshō Jinkōmondai Kenkyūsho.Google Scholar
Japan Research Institute (JRI) (2003), ‘Kiki ni aru Nenkin Kaikaku no Rongi’ [Pension Reform Debates in Crisis], JRI News Release, 1 July.Google Scholar
Kato, Junko. 1991), ‘Public Pension Reforms in the United States and Japan: A Study of Comparative Public Policy’, Comparative Political Studies, 24 (1), 100–126.Google Scholar
Kawato, Yuko, Pekkanen, Robert J., and Yamamoto, Hidehiro (2011), ‘State and Civil Society in Japan’, in Gaunder, Alisa (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Japanese Politics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kōteki Nenkin Kaikaku Kenkyūkai [Public Pension Reform Research Group] (2003), ‘Kōteki Nenkin Seido ni kansuru Bunseki’ [An Analysis on the Public Pension System], Tokyo: Keidanren.Google Scholar
Kunieda, Shigeki (2002), ‘Japanese Pension Reform: Can We Get Out of Intergenerational Exploitation?’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 43 (2): 57–71.Google Scholar
Meguro, Yoshikazu and Kamoshida, Takeshi (2005), ‘Chūōshōchō ni okeru Shimin Sankagata no Seisaku Keisei’ [Citizen-Participatory Policymaking in Central Governmental Agencies], Best Value 9, April.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW) (1997), ‘21-seiki no Nenkin wo Sentaku suru’ [Choose the Pension System for the 21st Century], Tokyo: MHW.Google Scholar
MHLW (2001), ‘Shakai Hoshō Shingikai Nenkin Sūri Bukai Iin Meibo’ [List of Pension Actuarial Subcommittee Members], 25 December.Google Scholar
MHLW (2002), ‘Nenkin Kaikaku no Kokkaku ni kansuru Hōkōsei to Ronten’ [Direction and Issues of the Pension Reform Framework], Kōseirōdōshō Nenkinkyoku [Pension Bureau, MHLW], December 5.Google Scholar
MHLW (2006), ‘Nenkin Bukai no Kongo no Susumekata’ [Future Plans for Pension Subcommittee], December 27.Google Scholar
MHLW (2009a), Japan's Public Pension System, Tokyo: MHLW.Google Scholar
MHLW (2013a), ‘Dai Jūyon kai Shakai Hoshō Shingikai Nenkin Bukai no Kaisai ni tsuite’ [Announcement on the Holding of the 14th PS/SSC Session], March 25.Google Scholar
MHLW (2013b), ‘Heisei 24-nendo no Kokumin Nenkin Hokenryō no Nōfu Jōkyō to Kongo no Torikumi nado ni tsuite’ [The Status of National Pension Premium Payment in 2012 and How to Cope with It], 24 June.Google Scholar
Miura, Mari and Palier, Bruno (2003), ‘Veto Players and Welfare Reform: The Paradox of the French and Japanese Unions’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, 27–31 August.Google Scholar
National Policy Unit (kokka senryakushitsu) (2000), ‘Atarashii Nenkin Seido no Kihonteki Kangae kata ni tsuite’ [On the Basic Perspectives on the New Pension System], Review Committee for the New Pension System (atarashii nenkin seido ni kansuru kentōkai), Cabinet Office, June 29.Google Scholar
Negishi, Takashi (2012), ‘Shakai Hoshō Zei Ittai Kaikaku ni okeru Nenkin Seido Kaisei’ [Revising Pension System in the Comprehensive Reform of Social Security and Tax], Rippō to Chōsa [Legislation and Research] 328, May, 40–64.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Akihiro (2009), The Failure of Civil Society? The Third Sector and the State in Contemporary Japan, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Isabel, Sara, Burke, Mohamed, Berrada, and Hernán, Cortés (2013), ‘World Protests 2006–2013’, Initiative for Policy Dialogue Working Paper, September.Google Scholar
Osmani, Siddiqur R (2008), ‘Participatory Governance: An Overview of Issues and Evidence’, in Participatory Governance and the Millennium Development Goals, edited by Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert (2006), Japan's Dual Civil Society: Members without Advocates, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1974), ‘The Bureaucratization of Policymaking in Postwar Japan’, American Journal of Political Science 18 (4), 656–663.Google Scholar
Pensions Subcommittee of the Social Security Council (PS/SSC) (2006), ‘Shakai Hoshō Shingikai Nenkin Bukai Iin Meibo’ [List of PS/SSC Members], 25 December.Google Scholar
PS/SSC (2009), ‘Nenkin Seido no Shōraina Minaoshi ni mukete’ [Towards a Long-Term Reform of Pension System], 27 November.Google Scholar
PS/SSC (2011a), ‘Shakai Hoshō Shingikai Nenkin Bukai Iin Meibo’ [List of PS/SSC Menbers], 25 August.Google Scholar
PS/SSC (2011b), ‘Nenkin Bukai no susume kata ni tsuite (An)’ [On the Deliberation Procedure of PS/SSC (tentative)], 26 August.Google Scholar
PS/SSC (2011c), ‘Kakugiin no Iken no Seiri (Miteikō)’ [Summary of Individual Committee Members (draft)], 16 December.Google Scholar
PS/SSC (2012), ‘Seido Uneijō no Kaizen Jikō ni tsuite’ [On the Matters to be improved for System Management], 6 February.Google Scholar
Roberts, Nancy C. (2008), ‘Direct Citizen Participation: Challenges and Dilemmans’, in Roberts, Nancy C. (ed.), The Age of Direct Citizen Participation, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Frank J. and Pharr, Susan J. (eds.) (2003), The State of Civil Society in Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shinkawa, Toshimitsu (2001), ‘Sengo Shakai Hoshō Seisaku no Katei to Kōzō’ [Process and Structure of the Postwar Social Security Policies], Shakai Hoshō Kenkyū, 37 (1): 4–16.Google Scholar
Shinkawa, Toshimitsu (2005), ‘The Politics of Pension Reform in Japan: Institutional Legacies, Credit-claiming and Blame Avoidance’, in Bonoli, Giuliano and Shinkawa, Toshimitsu (eds.), Ageing and Pension Reform around the World, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Chika (2005), Kosodate Shien de Shakai ga kawaru [Supporting Childcare Will Change Society], Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Tajika, Eiji (2002), The Public Pension System in Japan: The Consequences of Rapid Expansion, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Takegawa, Shōgo (2006), ‘Nenkin Shakaigaku no Kōsō’ [An Idea of Pension Sociology], in Fukushi Rejīmu no Nikkan Hikaku [Comparing Welfare Regimes in Japan and Korea], Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
Tsujinaka, Yutaka and Mori, Hiroki (2010), Gendai Shakai Shūdan no Seiji Kinō; [Political Roles of Contemporary Social Organizations], Tokyo: Bokutakusha.Google Scholar
Tsujinaka, Yutaka, Pekkanen, Robert, and Yamamoto, Hidehiro (2009), Gendai Nihon no Jichikai, Chōnaikai [Neighborhood Associations in Contemporary Japan], Tokyo: Bokutakusha.Google Scholar
Tsujinaka, Yutaka, Choe, Jae-Young, and Ohtomo, Takafumi (2007), ‘Exploring the Realities of Japanese Civil Society through Comparison’, Asien, 105: 16–32.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Katsuya (2005), ‘Nenkin Seido no Gabanansu: Seido Kaisei to Kaku Sutēkuhoruda’ [Governance of the Pension System: Institutional Revision and Stakeholders], Shakai Hoshō Kenkyū, 41 (3): 211–223.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Kenzo, Guo, Yung-Shing, and Cheng, Li-Hsuan (2006), ‘The Japanese Pension Reform of 2004: A New Mode of Legislative Process’, Asian Survey, 46 (3): 381–400.Google Scholar
Yun, Ji-Whan (2010), ‘Unequal Japan: Conservative Corporatism and Labour Market Disparities’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar