Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:51:18.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indonesia's Postcolonial Regional Imaginary: From a ‘Neutralist’ to an ‘All-Directions’ Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2011

MARSHALL CLARK
MARSHALL CLARK*
Affiliation:
School of International and Political Studies, Deakin [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper will examine the various ways in which the regional imaginary has been conceptualized and developed in maritime Southeast Asia, primarily focussing on Indonesia. Utilizing the recent debate on the notion of a ‘Postcolonial International Relations,’ this paper examines the role of imperialism and the colonial experience on the development of Indonesian ‘ideas’ of region and regionalism. This paper is structured into four sections. First of all, it explores the link between postcolonial theory and regionalism studies. Second, it takes into account early ideas of regionalism in the post-independence era. This includes President Sukarno's ‘neutralist’ foreign policy culminating in Indonesia's hosting of the Bandung Conference as well as President Suharto's endorsement of ASEAN. The third and final section examines Indonesia's foreign policy orientation and practices in the post-authoritarian period, particularly under President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. With its embrace of democracy in the post-New Order era, the concluding discussion suggests that Indonesia appears to be increasingly prepared to expand its regional engagement concentrically beyond the immediate Southeast Asian region. The question of the ‘imperial’ role of the US – which has its own foreign policy ambitions in the region – is instrumental in this regard, and can be usefully understood from a postcolonial framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 287 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav (2008), Singapore's Foreign Policy: The Search for Regional Order, New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Alatas, Syed Farid (2004), ‘The Meaning of Alternative Discourses: Illustrations from Southeast Asia’, in Ravi, Srilata, Rutten, Mario, and Goh, Beng-Lan (eds.), Asia in Europe, Europe in Asia, Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 57–78.Google Scholar
Anwar, Dewi Fortuna (2008), ‘Indonesia and the Bandung Conference: Then and Now’, in Tan, See Seng and Acharya, Amitav (eds.), Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian–African Conference for International Order, Singapore: NUS Press, pp. 180–97.Google Scholar
Arifianto, Alexander R. (2010), ‘The Securitization of Transnational Labor Migration: The Case of Malaysia and Indonesia’, Asian Politics and Policy, 1 (4): 613–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ba, Alice D. (2009), (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Basu, Partha Pratim, Chatterjee, Shibashis, Ghosh, Anjali, and Sen, Sumita (2008), North–South Relations: A Postcolonial Research Agenda, Melbourne: Institute of Postcolonial Studies.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark (2009), Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chio, Vanessa C.M. (2005), Malaysia and the Development Process: Globalization, Knowledge Transfers and Postcolonial Dilemmas, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chong, Terence (ed.) (2008), Globalization and Its Counter-forces in Southeast Asia, Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhry, Geeta and Nair, Sheila (eds.) (2002), Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colbert, Evelyn (1986), ‘ASEAN as a Regional Organization: Economics, Politics and Security’, in Karl D. Jackson, Sukhumbhand Paribatra, and Soedjati Djiwandono (eds.), ASEAN in Regional and Global Context, Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies, pp. 194–210.Google Scholar
Darby, Phillip (ed.) (1997), At the Edge of International Relations: Postcolonialism, Gender and Dependency, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Darby, Phillip (1998), The Fiction of Imperialism: Reading between International Relations and Postcolonialism, London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Darby, Phillip, Goonewardene, Devika, Ng, Edgar, and Obendorf, Simon (2003), A Postcolonial International Relations?, Melbourne: Institute of Postcolonial Studies.Google Scholar
Day, Tony and Foulcher, Keith (eds.) (2002), Clearing a Space: Postcolonial Readings of Modern Indonesian Literature, Leiden: KITLV Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, Donald K. (2009), ‘Obama's Trifecta – So Far So Good’, AsiaTimes Online, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/06/11/obamas-trifecta-so-far-so-good/ (retrieved 24 April 2010).Google Scholar
Fealy, Greg and Thayer, Carlyle A. (2009), ‘Problematising “Linkages” between Southeast Asian and International Terrorism’, in Tow, William (ed.), Security Politics in the Asia-Pacific, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feith, Herb (1978), The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, Gaddis, John Lewis, and Hurrell, Andrew (2003), Order and Justice in International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulcher, Keith (1995), ‘In Search of the Postcolonial in Indonesian Literature’, Sojourn, 10 (2): 147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulcher, Keith (2008), ‘On a Roll: Pramoedya and the Postcolonial Transition’, Indonesian Studies Working Papers, 4: 1–22.Google Scholar
Hadiwinata, Bob S. (2009), ‘International Relations in Indonesia: Historical Legacy, Political Intrusion, and Commercialization’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9 (1): 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haqq, Rahhalah (2000), ‘Framing a “Third Way” for the Msulim Ummah and the World’, Crescent International, November: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2000), Empire, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jedamski, Doris (2009), ‘Introduction’, in Jedamski, D (ed.), Chewing Over the West: Occidental Narratives in Non-Western Readings, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. ix–xviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Matthew (2002), Conflict and Confrontation in South-East Asia, 1961–1965: Britain, the United States, Indonesia and the Creation of Malaysia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kivimaki, Timo (2008), ‘Competing Globalization: The Case of Economic Cooperation with Indonesia against International Terrorism’, in Chong, Terence (ed.), Globalization and Its Counter-forces in Southeast Asia, Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 231–55.Google Scholar
Leifer, Michael (1983), Indonesia's Foreign Policy, London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs and George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ling, L. H. M. (2002), Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West, Basington: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mohamad, Mahathir Bin (1996), ‘Globalization: What it Means to Small Nations’, Inaugural Lecture of the Prime Ministers of Malaysia Fellowship Exchange Programme, Kuala Lumpur, 24 July.Google Scholar
Murphy, Ann Marie (2010), ‘US Rapprochement with Indonesia: From Problem State to Partner’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 32 (3): 362–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narine, Shaun (1998), ‘ASEAN and the Management of Regional Security’, Pacific Affairs, 71 (2): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, Antonio (2008), Reflections on Empire, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Nordholt, Henk Schulte (2004), ‘Locating Southeast Asia: Postcolonial Paradigms and Predicaments’, in Ravi, S., Rutten, M., and Goh, B.-L. (eds.), Asia in Europe, Europe in Asia, Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 36–56.Google Scholar
O'Hagan, Jacinta (2000), ‘A “Clash of Civilisations”?’, in Fry, Greg and O'Hagan, Jacinta (eds.), Contending Images of World Politics, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelizzo, Riccardo (2010), ‘Antonio Negri, Reflections on Empire’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64 (2): 248–9.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony (2000), Charting the Shape of Early Modern Southeast Asia, Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Riddell, Peter (2008), ‘Globalisation, Western and Islamic, into the 21st Century: Perspectives from Southeast Asia and Beyond’, Asian Christian Review, 2 (2 & 3): 128–52.Google Scholar
Santoso, Ferry (2008), ‘Semangat ASEAN: Kompetisi Global dan Peradaban Serumpun’, Kompas, 4 April 2008.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Leonard C. and Lanti, Irman G. (2009), ‘Perceiving Indonesian Approaches to International Relations Theory’, in Acharya, A. (ed.), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia, London: Routledge, pp. 148–73.Google Scholar
Seth, Sanjay (2000), ‘A “Postcolonial World”?’, in Fry, Greg and O'Hagan, Jacinta (eds.), Contending Images of World Politics, London: Macmillan Press, pp. 215–26.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Greg (2010), ‘Djalal a Friend in Washington’, The Australian, 23 September, p. 12.Google Scholar
Sukma, Rizal (2009), ‘Indonesia Needs a Post-ASEAN Foreign Policy’, The Jakarta Post, 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
Tan, See Seng and Acharya, Amitav (eds.) (2008), Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian–African Conference for International Order, Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Tarling, Nicholas (2006), Regionalism in Southeast Asia: To Foster the Political Will, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle A (2008), ‘Radical Islam and Political Terrorism in Southeast Asia’, in Chong, Terence (ed.), Globalisation and Its Counter-forces in Southeast Asia, Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 256–75.Google Scholar
Yudhoyono, Susilo Bambang (2010), ‘The National Speech of the President of the Republic of Indonesia’, paper presented to The People's Consultative Assembly, Jakarta, 16 August.Google Scholar