Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:48:58.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour takes Root; Mobilization and Immobilization of Javanese Rural Society under the Cultivation System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Leonard Blussé
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the production of tropical export crops, the factor labour has always overshadowed the two other factors, land and capital. In the days prior to the mechanisation of agriculture, that is to say, far into the second half of the 19th century, the factor capital almost coincided with labour. “Des bras, des bras, toujours des bras” as the saying went among the planters of the Mascareignes. However, it would be wrong to suggest that before the industrial revolution the relative importance of labour only manifested itself in the production of tropical export crops. There is a revered tradition in economic theory which considers labour to be the only source of wealth. Thus, Karl Marx proposed that the value produced by a labourer above the maintenance level should be designated as surplus value. For him, the control of this surplus lay at the basis of each “mode of production” (his term for a stage of development). Each mode of production was characterised by a specific set of social relations between the labourer, the ruling class that appropriates the surplus value, and the means of production. Labour and the labour process therefore were in his eyes a social phenomenon. One might add they are inherent to the tissue of authorities that constituate any social order.

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 77 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bastin, John, 1954, Raffles' Ideas on the Land Rent System in Java and the Mackenzie Land Tenure Commission. Verh. K.I.T.L.V., deel XIV, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Blok, Anton, 1980, “Eer en de fysieke persoon” in: Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis.Google Scholar
Blussé, Leonard, “Trojan Horse of Lead: the Picis in Early 17th Century Java", in Anrooy, F. van, ed. 1979, Between People and Statistics. Den HaagGoogle Scholar
Boeke, J.H., 1966, “Dualistic Economics” in Indonesian Economics, the Concept of Dualism Theory and Practice, The Hague, pp. 165–192.Google Scholar
Boomgaard, P., 1980, “Bevolkingsgroei en Welvaart op Java (1800-1942)” in Kamerling, R.N.J. ed. Indonesie toen en nu, Amsterdam, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. van den, 1864, Mijne Verrigtingen in Indie, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. van den, 1825 (composed in 1815)Brief inhoudende eenige onpartijdige aanmerkingen op eene memorie, onlangs in het licht verschenen, onder den titel van Staat der N.O.I, bezittingen, onder het bestuur van den G.G. H.W. Daendels, 's Gravenhage.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. van den, 1818, Nederlandsche bezittingen in Azie, Amerika en Afrika, 's Gravenhage.Google Scholar
Breman, J.C., 1980, The desa on Java and the Early Colonial State, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Breman, J.C., 1983, Control of Land and Labour in Colonial Java. Verh. K.I.T.L.V., deel 101, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, D.H., 1975, Sociologisch-Economische Geschiedenis van Indonesie, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Burger, D.H., 1939, De ontsluiting van Java's binnenland voor het wereldverkeer, Leiden.Google Scholar
Bussemaker, J.B., 1887, lets over het landbezit van den inlander in Nederlandsch Indie, Leiden.Google Scholar
Carey, Peter B.A., “Waiting for the Ratul Adil (“Just King”). The Javanese Village Community on the Eve of the Java War (1825:1830)”. Paper presented to the Second Anglo-Dutch Conference on Comparative Colonial History, Leiden 1981.Google Scholar
Day, C., 1900, “Experience of the Dutch with Tropical Labor,” Yaie Review, 2:420–433, and 5: 58–75.Google Scholar
Day, C., 1904, The Policy and Administration of the Dutch in Java, New York. Deventer, S. van,Google Scholar
1865, Bijdragen tot de kennis van het Iandel ijk Stelsel op Java, Zaltbommel.Google Scholar
1876, Eindresume Onderzoek naar de rechten van den Inlander op den grond op Java en Madoera, Batavia.Google Scholar
Elson, R.E., 1979, Sugar and Peasants, unpublished doctoral thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
Fasseur, C., 1975, Kultuurstelsel en Koloniale Baten, Leiden.Google Scholar
C., Fasseur, 1978, “Some Remarks on the Cultivation System in Java,” in Papers of the Dutch-Indonesian Historical Conference, Leiden/Jakarta, pp. 101–118.Google Scholar
Fasseur, C. ed., 1980, Geld en Geweten, “Dagboek van een Nederlands bestuursambtenaar uit het midden van de negentiende eeuw”, Den Haag, pp. 163–172.Google Scholar
Fernando, M.R., 1981, Peasants and Plantation Economy: the Social Impact of the European Plantation Economy in Cirebon Residency from the Cultivation System to the end of the First Decade of the Twentieth Century, unpublished thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, 1963, Agrarian Involution, the Processes of Ecological Change in Indonesia, UCLA.Google Scholar
Haan, F. de, 1910-1912, Priangan, De Preanger Regentschappen onder het Nederlandsch Bestuur tot 1811. 4 vols. Batavia.Google Scholar
Hoadley, M., 1983, “Slavery, Bondage and Dependency in Pre-Colonial Java: The Cirebon-Priangan Region”, in Reid, A., ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency in Southeast Asia. Queensland, pp. 90–117.Google Scholar
Hoorn, Joan van c., 1700, Corte beschrijvinge van het noord-Oostelijckste gedeelte van Java's opkomst en voortgangh, manuscript collection KITLV, Leiden, no. H73.Google Scholar
Klaveren, J.J. van, 1953, The Dutch Colonial System in The East Indies, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Klein, J.W. de, 1931, Het Preangerstelsel (1677-1871) en zijn nawerking, Delft.Google Scholar
Kloosterhuis, C.A., 1981, De Bevolking van de vrije kolonien der Maatschappij van Weldadigheid, Zutphen.Google Scholar
Kolff, van der G.H., 1936, The Historical Developments of the Labour Relationships in a Remote Corner of Java as they apply to the Cultivation of Rice, Batavia.Google Scholar
Kommers, J.H.M., 1979, Besturen in een onbekende wereld. Het Europese binnenlands bestuur in Nederlands-Indië: 1800-1830. 2 dln, Meppel.Google Scholar
Knight, G.R., 1982, “Capitalism and Commodity Production in Java” in Alavi, Hamza ed. Capitalism and Colonial Production, London, pp. 119–158.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. 1974. Knights and Samurai, Feudalism in Northern France and Japan, London.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, C., 1975, Femmes, greniers et capitaux, Paris.Google Scholar
Moertono, Soemarsaid, 1981, State and Statecraft in Old Java. A Study of the Later Mataram Period, 16th to 19th Century, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Money, W.J., 1861, Java, or how to manage a Colony, London, 1861.Google Scholar
Naipaul, V.S., 1982, Among the Believers. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Niel, Robert van, 1964, “The Function of Landrent under the Cultivation System in Java,” Journal of Asian Studies XXIII, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niel, Robert van, 1972, “Measurement of change under the Cultivation System in Java”, Indonesia, XIV.Google Scholar
Niel, Robert van, 1981, “The Effect of Export Cultivations in Nineteenth century Java”, Modern Asian Studies, 15, pp. 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, Robert A., 1970, The Social Bond. New York.Google Scholar
North, Douglas, and Thomas, Robert Paul, 1973, The Rise of the Western World, A New Economic History, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, N.G., 1868, Het Kultuurstelsel. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Reinsma, R., 1955, Het yerval van het cultuurstelsel, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Raffles, T.S., 1817, History of Java, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
Rey, P.P., 1971, Colonialisme, néo-colonialism et transition au capitalisme: l'example de la ‘Comilog’ au Congo-Brazzaville, Paris.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, M.C., 1981, A History of Modern Indonesia, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouffaer, G.P., 1906, “Vorstenlanden” in Lith, P.A. van deret.al. (eds.) Encyclopedic van Nederlandsch-Indië, IV, 587–653.Google Scholar
Schoutendorp, J., 1874, Schets van de Geschiedenis der Landrente op Java, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Soest, G.H. van, 1869 Geschiedenis van het Kultuurstelsel, 3 vols. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H.A., 1979, The Making of a Bureaucratic Elite. The Colonial Transformation of the Javanese priyayi, Singapore.Google Scholar
Vollenhoven, C. van, 1925, Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië, eerste deel, 2de stuk, Leiden.Google Scholar
Wertheim, W.F., 1978, Indonesië van vorstenrijk tot neo-kolonie, Meppel.Google Scholar
Westendorp Boerma, J.J., 1950, Een geestdriftig Nederlander, Johannes van den Bosch, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
White, Benjamin., 1973, “Demand for labor and Population Growth in Colonial Java,” Human Ecology, I: 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Benjamin., 1983, Agricultural Involution and its Critics: Twenty Years after Clifford Geertz, Working Papers Series No. 6, I.S.S. The Hague.Google Scholar