Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:35:02.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTEGRAZIONE EUROPEA E WELFARE STATES NAZIONALI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Fritz W. Scharpf  and
Luca Verzichelli

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Il processo di integrazione europea è caratterizzato da una asimmetria fondamentale descritta accuratamente da Joseph Weiler (1981) come un dualismo tra le norme sopranazionali europee ed il policy-making europeo di tipo intergovernativo. Weiler ha ancora ragione nella sua critica agli scienziati politici, colpevoli di aver troppo a lungo concentrato la propria attenzione soltanto sugli aspetti della negoziazione intergovernativa e di aver ignorato (o comunque non aver preso sufficientemente in considerazione) l'emergere, essenzialmente per via giurisdizionale, di un ordinamento legale europeo che prevale sulle leggi nazionali (Weiler 1994). Questa omissione è tanto più grave poiché ha impedito di individuare il parallelismo, politicamente assai significativo, tra il dualismo indicato da Weiler e la più comune contrapposizione tra una integrazione «positiva» ed una «negativa» (Tinbergen 1965; Rehbinder e Stewart 1984), cioè tra le misure che allargano l'integrazione del mercato eliminando i vincoli nazionali sugli scambi e le distorsioni competitive, da un lato, e le politiche europee comuni che modellano le condizioni sotto le quali i mercati operano, dall'altro.

Summary

Summary

The aims of this article are firstly to point out the extent of the «negative» and «positive» European integration and, then, to discuss the consequences of this historical transformation and its impact on the policy making of the European States. The starting point of the article is the too limited attention paid by the political scientists to the implications of the slow development of «positive integration» and of the correspondent loss of «boundary control» due to the great expansion of negative integration. The European Commission and the Court of Justice are to be seen as the institutions which have been the strongest beneficiaries of this process.

The second part of the paper is devoted to the discussion of some possible solutions for this problem, using some historical cases, from the American experience and from ther recent process of unification in Germany.

Type
Saggi
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , April 1996 , pp. 21 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Alber, J. e Bernardi Schenklunn, B. (1992), Westeuropäische Gesundheitssysteme im Vergleich: Budesrepublik Deutschland, Schweitz, Frankreich, Italien, Groβbritannien, Frankfurt, Campus.Google Scholar
Alter, K.J. e Meunier-Aitsahalia, S. (1994), Judicial Politics in the European Community. European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision, in <Comparative Political Studies>, 26, pp. 535–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, P. (1994), Die Wirtschaftsverfassung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, in Brüggemeier, G. (a cura di), Verfassungen für ein ziviles Europa, Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 73–90.Google Scholar
Burley, A. e Mattli, W. (1993), Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration, in <International Organization>, 47, pp. 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, C. (1993), Nationalism and Civil Society: Democracy, Diversity and Self-Determination, in <International Sociology>, 8, pp. 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. (1993), Industrial Relations and European State Traditions, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1994), A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation, in <Political Science Quarterly>, 109, pp. 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehousse, R. (1993), Does Subsidiarity Really Matter?, Florence, EUI Working Paper Law, n. 92/32.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R. (1995), Institutional Reform in the European Community. Are there Alternatives to the Majoritarian Avenue?, Florence, EUI Working Paper RSC, n. 95/4.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R. e Weiler, J.H.H. (1990), The Legal Dimension, in Wallace, W. (a cura di), The Dynamics of European Integration, London, Pinter, pp. 242–260.Google Scholar
Eichener, V. (1993), Soziales Dumping oder innovative Regulation? Interessenkonfigurationen und Einfluβchancen im Prozeβ der Harmonisierung des technischen Arbeitsschutzes, in Süß, W. e Becher, G. (a cura di), Technologieentwicklung und europäische Integration, Berlin, Duncker u. Humblot, pp. 207–235.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Featherstone, K. (1994), Jean Monnet and the <Democratic Deficit> in the European Union, in <Journal of Common Market Studies>, 132, pp. 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, T. (1992), Reif für die Mülltonne. Die EG-Verpackungspläne beweisen, daβ der Umweltschutz dem Binnenmarkt geopfert werden soll, in <Süddentsche Zeitung>, 25–26 luglio, 33.Google Scholar
Ganslandt, H. (1993), Das System der sozialen Sicherung in Griechenland, in Lottes, G. (a cura di), Soziale Sicherheit in Europa. Renten und Sozialversicherungssysteme im Vergleich, Heidelberg, Physica, pp. 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G. (1992), International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market, in <International Organization>, 46, pp. 533–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G. (1995), The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union, in <International Organization>, 49, pp. 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, J. (1993), Westeuropäische Integration und die Schwierigrkeiten der Entstehung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit, in <Zeitschrift für Soziologie>, 22, pp. 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graebner, W. (1977), Federalism in the Progressive Era. A Structural Interpretation of Reform, in <Journal of American History>, 64, pp. 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (1992), Der Mangel an europäischer Demokratie, in <Der Spiegel>, 43/1992, 19 ottobre, pp. 57–59.,+43/1992,+19+ottobre,+pp.+57–59.>Google Scholar
Groeben, H. von der (1992), Probleme einer europäischen Wirtschaftsordnung, in Baur, J.F., Müller-Graff, P.C. e Zuleeg, M. (a cura di), Europarecht, Energierecht, Wirtschaftsrecht. Festschrift für Bodo Barner, Köln, Carl Heymanns, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar
Hank, R. (1994), Die Eisenacher und die Rüsselsheimer. Im Opel-Werk an der Wartburg hat die Zukunft schon begonnen, in <Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung>, 6 agosto, p. 11.,+6+agosto,+p.+11.>Google Scholar
Heckathorn, D.D. e Maser, S.M. (1987), Bargaining and Constitutional Contracts, in <American Journal of Political Science>, 31, pp. 142–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Héritier, A., Mingers, S., Knill, C. e Becka, M. (1994), Die Veränderung von Staatlichkeit in Europa. Ein regulativer Wettbewerb, Deutschland, Groβbritannien und Frankreich in der Europäischen Union, Opladen, Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (1991), Markt ohne Staat? Die Wirtschaftsverfassung der Gemeinschaft und die regulative Politik, in Wildenmann, R. (a cura di), Staatswerdung Europas? Optionen für eine europäische Union, Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 225–268.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (1994a), Legitimationsprobleme des Europäischen Wiirtschaftsrechts und der Vertrag von Maastricht, in Brüggemeier, G. (a cura di), Verfassungen für ein ziviles Europa, Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 91–130.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (1994b), Rationalisierungsprozesse im Vertragsrecht und im Recht der Produktsicherheit. Beobachtungen zu den Folgen der Europäischen Integration für das Privatrecht, Florence, EUI Working Paper Law, n. 94/5. Google Scholar
Kapteyn, P. (1991), Civilization under Negotiation. National Civilizations and European Integration: The Treaty of Schengen, in <Archives Europeennes de Sociologie>, 32, pp. 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielmansegg, P.G. (1992), Ein Maβ für die Gröβe des Staates. Was wird aus Europa? Europa fehlt die Zustimmung seiner Bürger, in <Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung>, 2 dicembre, p. 35.,+2+dicembre,+p.+35.>Google Scholar
Kosonen, P. (1994), The Impact of Economic Integration on National Welfare States in Europe, Manoscritto, University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
Lange, P. (1992), The Politics of the Social Dimension, in Sbragia, A.M. (a cura di), Euro-Politics; Institutions and Policymaking in the <New> European Community, Washington, D.C., Brookings, pp. 225–256.Google Scholar
Langeheine, B. e Weinstock, U. (1984), Graduated Integration: A Modest Path Towards Progress, in <Journal of Common Market Studies>, 23, pp. 187–195.Google Scholar
Leibfried, S. e Pierson, P. (1992), Prospects for Social Europe, in <Politics & Society>, 20, pp. 333–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1993), The European Community between Social Policy and Social Regulation, in <Journal of Common Market Studies>, 31, pp. 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1994a), The European Community: An Independent Fourth Branch of Government?, in Brüggemeier, G. (a cura di), Verfassungen für ein ziviles Europa, Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1994b), Independence vs. Accountability? Non-Majoritarian Institutions and Democratic Government in Europe, Florence, EUI Working Paper SPS, n. 94/3.Google Scholar
Mattli, W. e Slaughter, A. (1995), Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett, in <International Organization>, 49, pp. 93–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, R. e Scharpf, F.W. (a cura di) (1995), Steuerung und Selbstorganisation in staatsnahen Sektoren, Frankfurt/M., Campus, in corso di stampa.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. (1993), Ende der Sozialdemokratie? Machtressourcen und Regierungpolitik im westeuropäischen Vergleich, Frankfurt/M., Campus.Google Scholar
Mestmäker, E.J. (1992), Widersprüchlich, verwirrend und gefährlich. Wettbewerbsregeln oder Industriepolitik: Nicht nur in diesem Punkt verstöβt der Vertrag von Maastricht gegen bewärte Grundsätze des Vertrages von Rom, in <FAZ>, 10.10.12, p. 15.,+10.10.12,+p.+15.>Google Scholar
Mestmäker, E.J. (1994), Zur Wirtshaftsverfassung in der Europäischen Union, in Hasse, R.H., Molberger, J. e Watrin, C. (a cura di), Ordnung in Freiheit. Festgabe für Hans Willgerodt zum 70 Geburrtstag, Stuttgart, Fischer, pp. 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Armack, A. (1956), Soziale Marktwirtschaft, in Ders., Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftpolitik. Studien und Konzepte zur sozialen Marktwirtschaft und zur Europäischen Integration, Freiburg i.b., Rombach, pp. 243–249.Google Scholar
Münster, W. (1993), Vaterstaat shafft es micht mehr. Die Eg im Kampf gegen die Arbeitslosigkeit. Nur neve Märkte Können verlorne Arbeitsplätze Ersetsen, <Süddentsche Zeitung>, 23 luglio, p. 31.,+23+luglio,+p.+31.>Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1984), Paths to European Unity, in <Journal of Common Markety Studies>, 23, pp. 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polany, K. (1957), The Great Transformation: the Political and Economic Origin of our Time, Boston, Beacon.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, E. e Stewart, R. (1984), Environmental Protection Policy: Integration through Law. Europe and American Federal Experience, Band 2, Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J.G. (1982), International Regimes, Transaction and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order, in <International Organization>, 36, pp. 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.G. (1995), At Home Abroad, Abroad at Home: International Liberalisation and Domestic Stability in the New World Economy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauter, W. (1995), The Telecommunication Laws of the European Community, in <European Law Journal>, 1, pp. 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1970), Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung, Konstanz, Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1988), The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, in <Public Administration>, 66, pp. 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1991a), Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1991b), Kann es in Europa eine stabile Föderale Balance geben?, in Wildenmann, R. (a cura di), Staatswerdung Europas? Optionen für eine Europäische Union, Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 415–428.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1992a), Europäisches Demokratiedefizit und deutscher Föderalism, in <Staatswissenschaft und Staatpraxis>, 3, pp. 293–306.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1992b), Koordination durch Verhandlungssysteme: Analytische Konzepte und institutionelle Lösungen, in A. Benz, Fritz W. Scharpf e R. Zintl, Horizontale Politikverflechtung. Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen, Frankfurt/M., Campus, pp. 51–96.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1993), Versuch über Demokratie im verhandelnden Staat, in Czada, R. e Schmidt, M.G. (a cura di), Verhandlungsdemokratie, Interessenvermittlung, Regierbarkeit. Festscrift für Gerhard Lehmbruch, Opeaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 25–50.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1994), Community and Autonomy: Multilevel Policy-making in the European Union, in <Journal of European Public Policy>, 1, pp. 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S.K. (1995), The Integration of the European Telecommunications and Electricity Sectors in the Light of International Relations Theories and Comparative Politics, manoscritto, Köln, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellshaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Schneider, V. (1995), Institutionelle Evolution als politischer Prozeβ: Die Entwicklung der Telekommunikation im historischen und internationalen Vergleich, manoscritto, Köln, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1957), The Supreme Court. Constitutional Revolution in Retrospect, New York, Ronald Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieber, W. (1993), Die soziale Sicherung in Portugal vor dem Hintergrund von EG-Integration und beschleunigtem wirtschaftlich-sozialem Strukturwandel, in Lottes, G. (a cura di), Soziale Sicherheit in Europa. Renten- und Sozialversicherungssysteme im Vergleich, Heidelberg, Physica, pp. 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, H.W. (1994), Wieviel Brüssel braucht Europa? Subsidiarität, Zentralisierung und Fiskalwettbewerb im Lichte der ökonomischen Theorie, in <Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis>, 5, pp. 155–186.Google Scholar
Sinn, S. (1993), The Taming of Leviathan. Competition among Governments, in <Constitutional Political Economy>, 3, pp. 177–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. (1993), From Market Making to State Building? Reflections on the Political Economy of European Social Policy, manoscritto, Madison, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Streit, M.E. e Mussler, W. (1995), The Economic Constitution of the European Community: From <Rome> to <Maastricht>, in <European Law Journal>, 1, pp. 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1965), International Economic Integration, Second Edition, Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1995), Decision making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartism, in corso di pubblicazione su <British Journal of Political Science>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Verloren van Themaat, P. (1987), Die Aufgabenverteilung zwischen dem Gesetzgeber und dem Europäischen Gerichtshof bei der Gestaltung der Wirtschaftsverfassung der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, in Mestmacker, E.J., Möller, H. e Schwarz, H.P. (a cura di), Eine Ordnungspolitik für Europa. Festschrift für Hans von der Groeben, Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 425–443.Google Scholar
Voelzkow, H. (1993), Staatseingriff und Verbandsfunktion: Das verbandliche System technischer Regelsetzung als Gegenstand staatlicher Politik, Discussion Paper 93/2, Köln, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, M. (1990), Class Conflict as a Dynamic Game, in Friedland, R. e Robertson, A.F. (a cura di), Beyond the Market-place. Rethinking Economy and Society, New York, Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
Weidenfeld, W. (1995), Europe ‘96. Reforming the European Union, Gütersloh, Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H. (1981), The Community System. The Dual Character of Supranationalism, in <Yearbook of European Law>, 1, pp. 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (1993), Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration, in <Journal of Common Market Studies>, 31, pp. 417–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (1994), A Quiet Revolution. The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors, in <Comparative Political Studies>, 26, pp. 510–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizsäcker, E.U. von (1989), Internationale Harmonisierung im Umneltschutz durch Ökonomische Instrumente – Gründe für eine europäische Umweltsteuer, in <Jahrbuch zur Staats- und Verwaltungswissenschaft>, Band 3/1989, pp. 203–216.,+Band+3/1989,+pp.+203–216.>Google Scholar
Williams, S. (1991), Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community, in Keohane, R.O. e Hoffmann, S. (a cura di), The New European Community. Decision Making and Institutional Change, Boulder, Westview, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
Wilson, T.M. e Smith, M.E. (a cura di) (1993), Cultural Changes and the New Europe: Perspectives on the European Community, Boulder, Westview.Google Scholar