Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:39:10.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers and the Nuclear Debate. Edited by Maxwell Cohen & Margaret E. Gouin [University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 1988, 419 pp.].

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2016

Bruce Hurwitz
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1989 , pp. 567 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research Student and Teaching Assistant, Dept. of International Relations, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

References

1 In an interview which appeared on the 39th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Japan, a Japanese university professor, who had been 30 years old and living in Tokyo at the time, remarked that he “couldn't have survived another month. If the military had [had] its way we would have fought until all 80 million Japanese were dead. Not me alone, but many Japanese, ironically speaking, were saved by the atomic bomb”. International Herald Tribune, 11 August 1983, p. 3. Emphasis added.

2 BVerfGe 66, 65.

3 Statute of the International Court of Justice, Art. 38(c).