Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:48:02.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The frames of the mind of a psychiatrist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2017

M. O. Huttunen
M. O. Huttunen*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
*
*Address for correspondence: M. O. Huttunen, MD, PhD, Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The structures of our mind may be understood as ‘frames’, which play a key role in our everyday goals, choices and decisions. Understanding these often unconscious processes may help us to understand the complex decisions we make in our clinical practice. Such frames may be many in number, being based, for example, on medical, psychological, social, trauma, or problem-solving models. The ‘frames’ we use in our clinical decisions should be tailored to the needs of our patients, and may need to be adapted at different phases of illness.

Keywords

Clinical decisionsframesmindunconscious
Type
Perspective Piece
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 134 - 135
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brendel, D (2006). Healing Psychiatry. Bridging the Science/Humanism Divide. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.10.7551/mitpress/3449.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecchin, G, Lane, G, Ray, WA (1994). Irreverence. A Strategy for Therapists’ Survival. Karnac Books: London.Google Scholar
Kendler, K, Parnas, J (2008). Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry: Explanation, Phenomenology, and Nosology. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G (1996/2002). Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. The University of Chicago University: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G (2014). The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!. Chelsea Green Publishing: Vermont.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G, Johnson, M (1983/2000). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago University: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Laing, R (1960). The Divided Self. An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. Penguin Books: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Szasz, TS (1960/2000). The Myth of Mental Illness. Foundation of a Theory of Personal Conduct. HarperCollins: New York.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G (1977). Adaptation to Life. Little, Brown & Co: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Yalom, I (1980). Existential Psychotherapy. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar