No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Current research issues in cross-cultural psychiatry
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2014
Abstract
The international pilot study of schizophrenia (IPSS) was the first major study to show that the use of standardised assessment and classification instruments allows the reliable comparison of data on the prevalence, psychopathology and prognosis of major psychiatric illness between different cultures. Important questions about the methodology used in cross-cultural research remain to be answered, however These include the inherently ‘Eurocentric’ nature of much of western psychiatric terminology and the absence of directly comparable concepts and language to describe emotional and psychological distress between western and non-western cultures. These difficulties especially arise in relation to illness where organic factors appear to contribute little to aetiology, such as the neurotic and Axis II disorders, and need to be overcome before useful crosscultural research into these disorders can be accomplished.
- Type
- Perspective
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
1.Outline for Cultural Formulation and Glossary of Culture-Bound Syndromes. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1994: (Appendix 1) 843–50.Google Scholar
2.Cox, JL. Aspects of transcultural psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 1977; 130:211–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cox, JL. Medical management, culture, and mental illness. Br J Hosp Med 1982; 27: 533–7.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Kraepelin, E (1904). In: Hirsch, SR, Sheperd, M. Themes and translations in European Psychiatry. Bristsol: John Wright & Sons, 1974.Google Scholar
5.Cooper, JE, Kendell, RE, Gurland, BJ, Sartorius, N, Farkas, T. Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: someresults from the first comparative investigation. Am J Psychiatry 1969; 125: 21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sartorius, N, Jablensky, A, Shapiro, R. Two year follow-up of the patients included in the WHO International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Psychol. Medicine 1977; 7: 529–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jablensky, A, Sartorius, N, Ernberg, G. Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. Psychol Medicine 1992; (monograph suppl 20).Google Scholar
8.Jablensky, A, Sartorius, N. Culture and schizophrenia (editorial). Psychol Medicine 1975;5:113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Sartorius, N, Jablensky, A, Gulbinat, W, Ernberg, G. WHO Collaborative Study: assessment of depressive disorders. Psychol Medicine 1980; 10:743–9.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Escobar, JI, Gomez, J, Tuason, VB. Depressive phenomenology in North and South American patients. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140:47–51.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Kleinman, A. Anthropology and psychiatry: the role of culture in cross-cultural research on illness. Br J Psychiatry 1987;151: 447–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Leff, JP. Culture and the differentiation of emotional states. Br J Psychiatry 1973; 123: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Leff, JP. The ‘New Cross-Cultural Psychiatry’: a case of the baby and the bathwater. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 156: 305–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Littlewood, R. From categories to contexts: a decade of the ‘New Cross-Cultural Psychiatry’. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 156: 308–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed