Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:24:14.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tablets from the Sippar Library XIII Enūma Anu Ellil XX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

F. N. H. Al-Rawi  and
A. R. George
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Sippar Library tablet IM 124485 is a new source for Tablet XX of Enūma Anu Ellil (EAE), the great compilation of Babylonian celestial and meteorological omens. The twentieth tablet of the series, which deals principally with lunar eclipses on the fourteenth day of each month of the year, was edited by Francesca Rochberg in 1988 along with all the other tablets of lunar-eclipse omens in EAE (Rochberg-Halton 1988: Chapter 10). Rochberg was unable to report the whole text of her MS M = ND 4357, a Neo-Assyrian tablet from the library of the temple of Nabû at Kalaḫ; it can now be consulted as CTN IV 5 (Wiseman and Black 1996: Pls. 5–6, 145), though the copy of the reverse is inadequate. In addition a Late Babylonian exemplar of a further commentary, written in the time of Philip Arrhidaeus for the scholar Iqīša of Uruk, has come to light in W23300 (now IM 75990), published as Uruk IV 162 (von Weiher 1993: 103–5, 186). Despite these additions to knowledge, some of the text of EAE XX remained poorly enough preserved to make the discovery of a new manuscript very welcome.

The new tablet allows seven sections of the text of EAE XX to be reconstructed in full, and our understanding of the technical terminology refined as a consequence. The chief interest of this tablet of EAE emerges more clearly than before. The common denominator of the twelve lunar-eclipse omens of EAE XX is eclipses that, at least notionally, set in “above” and clear “below”, as observed in 1. 66 of the tablet published here. However, the observed phenomena that especially distinguish the protases of EAE XX from those of other calendrical lunar-eclipse tablets appear to be particular to partial eclipses. The progress of the eclipse to a point at which the disk is half eclipsed (imšul) or more (eli mašāli illik) is explicitly recorded on six occasions (§§1.2, IV, V, VII, VIII, IX). The portents relate either to the moon's “emblem” (šurinnu), a term that signifies the moon in eclipse (§§1.1, IV), to its “horns” (qarnu), i.e. the cusps of the partially eclipsed disk (§§VIII, IX, X, XI, XII), or to both (§§V, VII). It seems that what the compiler of EAE XX considered most portentous were the appearance, behaviour and other aspects of the lunar disk while the moon was half, or more than half, eclipsed.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 68 , 2006 , pp. 23 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnaud, D. 1987. Recherches au pays d'Aštata. Emar VI/4. Textes de la bibliothèque: transcriptions et traductions. Paris Google Scholar
Bauer, T. 1936. Eine Sammlung von Himmelsvorzeichen. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 43: 308–14Google Scholar
Beaulieu, P.-A. 1999. The Babylonian man in the moon. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 51: 91–9Google Scholar
Brown, D. 2000. Mesopotamian Planetary Astronomy-Astrology. Cuneiform Monographs 18. Groningen Google Scholar
Brown, D. and Linssen, M. 1997. BM 134701 = 1965-10-14, 1 and the Hellenistic period eclipse ritual from Uruk. Revue d'assyriologie 91: 147–66Google Scholar
Charpin, D. 2004. Histoire politique du Proche-Orient amorrite (2002–1595), pp. 25–480 in Charpin, D., Edzard, D. O. and Stol, M., Mesopotamien. Die altbabylonische Zeit. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160/4. Fribourg and Göttingen Google Scholar
Cooper, J. S. 2005. Right writing: Talking about Sumerian orthography and texts. Acta Sumerologica 22 (2000) 43–52 Google Scholar
Finkel, I. L. 1988. Adad-apla-iddina, Esagil-kīn-apli, and the series SA.GIG, pp. 143–59 in Leichty, E., Ellis, Maria deJ. and Gerardi, Pamela (eds.): A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs. Philadelphia Google Scholar
Gasche, H., Armstrong, J. A., Cole, S. W. and Gurzadyan, V. G. 1998. Dating, the Fall of Babylon: A Reappraisal of Second-Millennium Chronology. Mesopotamian History and Environment, Memoirs 4. Ghent and Chicago Google Scholar
Geller, M. J. 1990. Astronomy and authorship. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53. 2: 209–13Google Scholar
Geller, M. J. 2000. Incipits and rubrics, pp. 225–58 in George, A. R. and Finkel, I. L. (eds.): Wisdom, Gods and Literature. Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert. Winona Lake Google Scholar
George, A. R. 1991. Review of Rochberg-Halton 1988. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 86, 4: 378–84Google Scholar
Gurzadyan, V. G. 2000. On the astronomical records and Babylonian chronology. Akkadica 119–20: 177–86Google Scholar
Horowitz, W. 1998. Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography. Mesopotamian Civilizations 8. Winona Lake Google Scholar
Huber, P. J. 1987. Dating by lunar eclipse omina with speculations on the birth of omen astrology, pp. 3–13 in Berggren, J. L. and Goldstein, B. R. (eds.), From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics: Essays on the Exact Sciences Presented to Asger Aaboe. Copenhagen Google Scholar
Huber, P. J. 1999–2000. Astronomical dating of Ur III and Akkad. Archiv für Orientforschung 46–7: 50–79 Google Scholar
Huber, P. J. 2000. Astronomy and ancient chronology. Akkadica 119–20: 159–76Google Scholar
Hunger, H. 1995. Ein Kommentar zu Mond Omina, pp. 105–18 in Dietrich, M. and Loretz, O. (eds.), Vom Alten Orient zum Alten Testament. Festschrift für Wolfram Freiherr von Soden zum 85. Geburtstag am 19. Juni 1993. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 240. Münster Google Scholar
Hunger, H. 2000. Uses of Enūma Anu Enlil for chronology. Akkadica 119–20: 155–8Google Scholar
Hunger, H. 2002. Über die Bedeutungslosigkeit der Finsternisse in Enūma Anu Enlil für die Chronologie, pp. 171–6 in Loretz, O., Metzler, K. A. and Schaudig, H. (eds.), Ex Mesopotamia et Syria Lux. Festschrift für Manfried Dietrich zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 281. Münster Google Scholar
Hunger, H. and Pingree, D. 1999. Astral Sciences in Mesopotamia. Handbuch der Orientalistik 1, 44. Leiden Google Scholar
Koch, J. 1998. Neues von den UR-III-Mondeklipsen. Nouvelles assyriologiques brèves et utilitaires 1998: 126–9 No. 132Google Scholar
Koch-Westenholz, U. 1993. Mesopotamian astrology at Hattusas, pp. 231–46 in Galter, H. D. (ed.), Die Rolle der Astronomie in den Kulturen Mesopotamiens. Grazer Morgenländische Studien 3. Graz Google Scholar
Koch-Westenholz, U. 1995. Mesopotamian Astrology: An Introduction to Babylonian and Assyrian Celestial Divination. Copenhagen Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1962. A catalogue of texts and authors. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 16: 59–77 Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1967. Enmeduranki and related matters. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 21: 126–38Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1998. The qualifications of Babylonian diviners, pp. 141–58 in Maul, S. M. (ed.), Festschrift für Rykle Borger zu seinem 65. Geburtstag am 24. Mai 1994. Cuneiform Monographs 10. Groningen Google Scholar
Reiner, E. 1999. Babylonian celestial divination, pp. 21–37 in Swerdlow, N. M. (ed.), Ancient Astronomy and Celestial Divination. Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. 1999. Continuity and change in omen literature, pp. 415–25 in Böck, B., Cancik-Kirschbaum, E. and Richter, T. (eds.), Munuscula Mesopotamia: Festschrift für Johannes Renger. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 267. Münster Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. 2004. The Heavenly Writing: Divination, Horoscopy and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture. Cambridge Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. 2006. Old Babylonian celestial divination, pp. 337–48 in Guinan, A. K. et al. (eds.), If a Man Builds a Joyful House. Assyriological Studies in Honor of Erie Verdun Leichty. Cuneiform Monographs 31. Leiden Google Scholar
Rochberg-Halton, F. 1984. Canonicity in cuneiform texts. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 36, 2: 127–44Google Scholar
Rochberg-Halton, F. 1988. Aspects of Babylonian Celestial Divination: The Lunar Eclipse Tablets of Enūma Anu Enlil. Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 22. Horn Google Scholar
Schaumberger, J. 1949. Die Mondfinsternisse der Dritten Dynastie von Ur. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 49: 50–8Google Scholar
Schaumberger, J. 1954–1956. Astronomische Untersuchung der “historischen” Mondfinsternisse in Enûma Anu Enlil. Archiv für Orientforschung 17: 89–92 Google Scholar
van Soldt, W. 1994. Review of Berggren, J. L. and Goldstein, B. R. (eds.), From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics. Bibliotheca Orientalis 51, 1–2: 117–19Google Scholar
von Weiher, E. 1993. Uruk: spätbabylonische Texte aus dem Planquadrat U 18, Teil IV. Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka Endberichte 12. Mainz am Rhein Google Scholar
Weidner, E. 1941–1944. Die astrologische Serie Enûma Anu Enlil. Archiv für Orientforschung 14: 172–95Google Scholar
Weidner, E. 1954–1956. Die astrologische Serie Enûma Anu Enlil. Tafel 15–22: Texte über Mondfinsternisse. Archiv für Orientforschung 17: 71–92 Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F. A. M. 2001. Ninšubur, pp. 490–500 in Edzard, D. O. (ed.), Reallexikon der Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie 9, 7–8. Berlin Google Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. and Black, J. A. 1996. Literary Texts from the Temple of Nabu. Cuneiform Texts from Nimrud 4. [London]Google Scholar