Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:33:10.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Queen under attack—A rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Dominique Collon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The object once known as the Burney Relief, and now renamed The Queen of the Night (hereinafter referred to as the Queen) is a mould-made plaque of straw-tempered clay (Fig. 1). Integral with the rectangular background (49.5 × 37 cm) is a nude figure who wears the horned headdress of a Mesopotamian goddess, has lowered wings, dewclaws and bird's talons, holds the divine rod-and-ring symbol in each hand, stands on the backs of two addorsed lions, and is flanked by large owls. Traces of black, red and white paint survive. Since it was first published in the Illustrated London News on 13 June 1936, the plaque has been hailed as a masterpiece of ancient Mesopotamian art generally dated to the Old Babylonian period and, more specifically, to the age of Hammurabi (reigned 1792–1750 BC according to the Middle Chronology). After more than seven decades in private ownership, the plaque finally came into the public domain when, in 2003, the British Museum celebrated its 250th anniversary with the acquisition of this iconic work.

One would expect such a unique piece to have its detractors, and in 1936–7 Dietrich Opitz published an article in which he raised doubts about its authenticity, although Van Buren, in her article appended to his (1936–7), came out in favour of the plaque. Then “a seminal article by Henri Frankfort (1937–9)… caused Opitz (1937–9) to change his mind” (Curtis and Collon 1996: 91–2), and other major scholars have agreed with Frankfort, including Thorkild Jacobsen (1987).

In 1970, Pauline Albenda published a short article that focused on two features of the plaque's iconography, namely the “ring and rod” (normally referred to as rod-and-ring) symbols held by the goddess, and the overlapping lions on which she stood. These led her to “conclude that the Burney relief is not genuine”. In 2005, she revived the debate in an article in the Journal of the American Oriental Society. I shall consider in turn the various points she raises (giving the relevant page numbers in brackets) and seek to demonstrate why I think her arguments to be flawed and why I am convinced that the Queen of the Night is a genuine work of the age of Hammurabi of Babylon.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 69 , 2007 , pp. 43 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliovraphy

Albenda, P. 1970. The Burney Relief Reconsidered. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society of Columbia University 2/2: 86–93.Google Scholar
Albenda, P. 2005. The “Queen of the Night” Plaque – A Revisit. Journal of the American Oriental Society 125/2: 171–90.Google Scholar
al-Gailani Werr, L. 1988. Studies in the Chronology and Regional Style of Old Babylonian Cylinder Seals. Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 23. Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Barrelet, M.-Th. 1952. À propos d'une plaquette trouvée à Mari (AO. 18962). Syria 29: 285–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, D., Forrières, C., Lemaire, F., and Bargain, F.. 1993. Les lions du temple du “Roi du pays” de Mari. Mari, Annales de Recherches Interdisciplinaires 7: 79–105.Google Scholar
Black, J. and Green, A. 1992: Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. 1987. Gudeazeitliche Funde aus Uruk. Baghdader Mitteilungen 18: 125–31.Google Scholar
Collins, P. 2006. Trees and Gender in Assyrian Art. Iraq 68: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collon, D. 1986. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum. Cylinder Seals III. Isin/Larsa and Old Babylonian Periods. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 1995. Ancient Near Eastern Art. London: British Museum Press; Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 2003. “A lady of the night”. British Museum Magazine 45: 6–7.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 2004. “Queen of the Night”. British Museum Magazine 48: 53–4.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 2005: The Queen of the Night. British Museum Objects in Focus. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. and Collon, D. 1996. Ladies of Easy Virtue. Collectanea Orientalia — Histoire, arts de l'espace et industrie de la terre. Études offertes en homage à Agnès Spycket. Eds. Gasche, H. and Hrouda, B.. Civilisations du Proche-Orient, Série 1/3. Neuchâtel — Paris: Recherche et Publications: 89–95.Google Scholar
de Genouillac, H. 1925. Premières recherches archéologiques à Kich II. Paris: Librairie ancienne Édouard Champion.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1937–1939. The Burney Relief. Archiv für Orientforschung 12: 128–35.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1975. Excavations at Nippur — Eleventh Season. Oriental Institute Communications 22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, A. R. 1985. A Note on the “Scorpion-Man” and Pazuzu. Iraq 47: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, F. A. in collaboration with personnel of the Iran Department of the Environment. 1977. A Guide to the Mammals of Iran. Tehran: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. 1987. Pictures and Pictorial Language (The Burney Relief). Figurative Language in the Ancient Near East. Eds. Mindlin, M., Geller, M. J. and Wandsworth, J. E.. London: 1–11.Google Scholar
Klengel-Brandt, E. and Cholidis, N. 2006. Die Terrakotten von Babylon im Vorderasiatischen Museum in Berlin. Saarwellingen: Saarländische Druckerei und Verlag.Google Scholar
Legrain, L. 1930. Terracottas from Nippur. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. (ed.). 2003. The Excavations at Tell Brak A. Exploring an Upper Mesopotamian Regional Centre. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar
McCown, D. E. and Haines, C. 1967. Nippur 1. The Temple of Enlil, Scribal Quarter, and Soundings. Oriental Institute Publications 78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Opitz, D. 1936–1937. Die vogelfüssige Göttin auf den Löwen. Archiv für Orientforschung 11: 350–3.Google Scholar
Opitz, D. 1937–1939. Die Probleme des Burney-Reliefs. Archiv für Orientforschung 12: 269–71.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. 1960: Sumer. Arts of Mankind, ed. Malraux, A. and Salles, G.. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Porada, E. 1980: The Iconography of Death in Mesopotamia in the Early Second Millennium B.C. In Death in Mesopotamia, ed. Alster, B.. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag: 256–67.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. and Roaf, M. D. 1997. The Shaikhan relief. al-Rafidain 18: 143–56.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 2000: Das Kultrelief aus Assur. Mitteilungen der deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 132: 105–112.Google Scholar
Reade, J. 2002. Early Monuments in Gulf Stone at the British Museum. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 92/2: 258–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuther, O. 1926. Die Innenstadt von Babylon (Merkes). WVDOG 47. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Van Buren, E. 1930. Clay Figur ines from Babylonia and Assyria. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Van Buren, E. 1936–1937. A Further Note on the Terra-cotta Relief. Archiv für Orientforschung 11: 354–7.Google Scholar
Van Buren, E. 1939. The Fauna of Ancient Mesopotamia as Represented in Art. Analecta Orientalia 18. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
von der Osten-Sacken, E. 2002. Überlegungen zur Göttin auf dem Burneyrelief. In Sex and Gender in the Ancient Near East: Proceedings of the 47th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Helsinki, July 2–6, 2001, ed. Parpola, S. and Whiting, R.. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project: 479–87.Google Scholar
Spycket, A. 1981. 4.3. Figurines de terre cuite du chantier sud-est (Südost Abschnitt). In Isin — Išan Bahrīyāt II. Die Ergibnisse der Ausgrabungen 1975–1978, ed. Hrouda, B.: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse NF 87. Munich: 71–5.Google Scholar
Wrede, N. 2003. Uruk Terrakotten I (AUWE 25). Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Woolley, L. Sir, and SirMallowan, M., 1976. Ur Excavations VII. The Old Babylonian Period. London: British Museum Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Zervos, C. 1935. L'Art de la Mésopotamie. Paris: Editions “Cahiers de l'Art”.Google Scholar