Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:22:07.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Place of Urartu in First-Millennium B.C. Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Maurits van Loon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although there has been much speculation about Urartian trade and the influence it might have had on countries to the West, I hope to show there is no evidence for such exports. On the contrary, Urartu seems to have been the receiver of some goods made in the South-West (either through trade or through plunder or imposition of tribute) and the producer of other goods which found their way to the North-east. The points of this paper have been made before, but in the face of new contentions to the contrary, it may be useful to restate them. Among small objects from north Syria commonly found in Urartu one might mention faience scaraboids with the emblem of the moon god of Harran.

The hypothesis that Urartian goods were widely traded to Greece and Italy through Syrian ports or overland via Phrygia is mainly based on the appearance, at a number of Greek and Italian sites, of copper or bronze basins with sets of four carrying-rings fixed by means of attachments in the shape of “sirens”, i.e. male or female busts rising out of a circle with bird's wings and tail. The most common obviously non-Greek and non-Italian type of female siren is characterized by a squat neckless head with thick short curls, huge eyes and nose, puckered mouth and receding chin.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1977 , pp. 229 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lehmann-Haupt, Carl F., “Materialien zur älteren Geschichte Armeniens” (Abhandlungen der (königlichen) Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse, neue Folge 9 (1907), no. 3), 65–124Google Scholar; Lehmann-Haupt, Carl F., Armenien einst und jetzt II/3 (Berlin, 1931), 488 ffGoogle Scholar.; Herzfeld, Ernst, in Janus I (Vienna, 1921), 150 ffGoogle Scholar.; Smith, Sidney in Antiquaries' Journal 22 (1942), 93–94, 103–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barnett, R. D., in Iraq 12 (1950), 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maxwell-Hyslop, K. R., in Iraq 18 (1956), 150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pallottino, M., in Archeologia Classica 7 (1955), 109–123Google Scholar; 9 (1959), 88–96; Pallottino, M., in East and West 9 (1958), 29 ffGoogle Scholar.; Birmingham, J. M., in Anatolian Studies 11 (1961), 185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Akurgal, E., Die Kunst Anatoliens (Berlin, 1961), 35–51Google Scholar; Piotrovskii, B. B., Iskusstvo Urartu (Leningrad, 1962), 61–63Google Scholar.

2 See my Urartian Art (Istanbul, 1966), preface and pp. 108–110, 174–178Google Scholar.

3 Labat, R., in Fischer Weltgeschichte 4: Die Altorientalische Reiche III (Frankfurt am Main, 1967), 23–24Google Scholar; Akurgal, E., Urartäische und altiranische Kunstzentren (Ankara, 1968), esp. 37–38, 47–48Google Scholar; Azarpay, G., Urartian Art and Artifacts (Berkeley, 1968), 54–55Google Scholar, calls all the sirens from Toprakkale Urartian and assumes strong Urartian influence in northern Syria.

4 Piotrovsky, B. B., Urartu (Geneva, 1969), Pl. 45Google Scholar.

5 Smith, op. cit (note 1). Birmingham, op. cit. (note 1).

6 Akurgal, op. cit. (note 3), 21–22, and Herrmann (see note 8), 33, argue that the beardless as well as the bearded sirens are to be thought of as male.

7 Kunze, E., Kretische Bronzereliefs Stuttgart, 1931), 273Google Scholar.

8 Herrmann, H. V., Die Kessel der orientalisierenden Zeit Berlin, 1966), 28–29, 56–59Google Scholar.

9 Karageorghis, V., Salamis in Cyprus (London, 1969), Pls. I, 40 and Fig. 27Google Scholar.

10 Lehmann-Haupt, , “Materialien …” (note 1), 86, Fig. 58Google Scholar; Armenien … II/1 (note 1), 262Google Scholar; Piotrovskii, B. B., Iskusstvo Urartu (Leningrad, 1962), Pls. XIV–XVGoogle Scholar.

11 Piotrovskii, B. B., in Sovetskaia Arkheologiia 6 (1940), 89–91Google Scholar.

12 Op. cit. (note 7), 272–273.

13 Amandry, P., in Syria 35 (1958), 80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Op. cit. (note 8), 65–67.

15 Orthmann, W., Untersuchmgen zur Späthethitischen Kunst Bonn, 1971), 164Google Scholar, with special reference to the relief-decorated supports of such basins.

16 Op. cit. (note 1), 48–49, Figs. 28–29; op. cit. (note 3), Pls. XXVII a, b, XXVIII a, b.

17 Garstang, J., in Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 1 (1908), Pl. XL, Fig. 2Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., Pl. XL, Fig. I.

19 See, e.g., Herrmann, op. cit. (note 8), Pls. 1–10.

20 J. Garstang, op. cit. (note 18), Pl. XLI, Fig. 2.

21 Landsberger, B., Sam'al Ankara, 1948), 76–77Google Scholar.

22 Melikishvili, G. A., Urartskie Klinoobraznye Nadpisi Moscow, 1960), no. 155E, lines 55–56Google Scholar.

23 Thureau-Dangin, F., Une relation it la huitième campagne de Sargon Paris, 1912), line 396Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., lines 358, 361.

25 Ezekiel 27: 13Google Scholar.

26 Herrmann, op. cit. (note 8), Pl. 11, shows a moustache above the beard, while the V-folds have been replaced by a lozenge pattern.

27 See note 10.

28 Piotrovskii, op. cit. (note to), Fig. 37.

29 Amandry, P., in Weinberg, Saul S., ed., The Aegean and the Near East (Locust Valley, 1956), 239–361Google Scholar; Hanfmann, George M. A., in Anatolian Studies 6 (1956), 205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Azarpay, top. cit. (note 3), 7, 16, Pl. 1

31 Kleiss, W. in Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran N.F. 8 (1975), 51–70, esp. Fig. 22Google Scholar.

32 Tekhov, B. V., in Sovetskaia arkheologiia (1961), no. 4, pp. 128–139Google Scholar.

33 Pridik, E. M., in Materialy po Arkheologii Rossii 13 (1911), Pl. IGoogle Scholar.

34 Piotrovskii, op. cit. (note 10), Pls. XXIV–XXV

35 Ibid., Pls. XXXIII–XXXVI; Pridik, loc. cit. (note 33).