Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:16:01.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structures in Crisis: A Narrative Approach to Asghar Farhadi’s Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2022

Aarón Rodríguez Serrano*
Affiliation:
Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain

Abstract

This paper proposes an exploration of the films of Iranian director Asghar Farhadi. It employs a methodology based on textual analysis, focusing specifically on the structural design of his films and the focalization processes of his scripts. It shows how Farhadi’s work can be understood as a coherent research project with a uniquely solid model based on chronological linearity as a way to explore the violent breakdown of different emotional communities: families, marriages, groups of friends, etc. At the same time, it considers how all the focalization processes in his films are oriented toward two main concepts: knowledge (of the characters, but also of the audience) and pain (of living in a [narrative] world afflicted by meaninglessness).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was supported by Universitat Jaume I—Project: Análisis de identidades discursivas en la era de la posverdad. Generación de contenidos audiovisuales para una Educomunicación Crítica (AIDEP). Directed by Javier Marzal Felici. Code: 18I390.01/1.

References

Bacon, Henry, “Making Sense of Hypothetical Focalization in the Cinema.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 11, no. 3 (2013): 288301. doi: 10.1080/17400309.2013.775095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balló, Jordi, and Pérez, Xavier. La semilla inmortal: los argumentos universales en el cine. Barcelona: Anagrama, 1997.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, La aventura semiológica. Barcelona: Paidós, 1990.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna, “Information Visualization and/as Enunciation .Journal of Documentation 73, no. 5 (2017): 903916. doi: 10.1108/JD-01-2017-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Brian T., After the American Century: The Ends of U.S. Culture in the Middle East. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Eidelsztein, Alfredo, “Lo simbólico de J. Lacan, o la función del Agujero.” El rey está desnudo: revista para el psicoanálisis por venir 3 (2011): 916.Google Scholar
Elena, Alberto, Los cines periféricos: África, Oriente Medio, India. Barcelona: Paidós, 1999.Google Scholar
García Catalán, Shaila, and Sorolla, Teresa. “Morfologías de nuestros áridos días felices.” L’Atalante: Revista de Estudios Cinematográficos 17 (2014): 4652.Google Scholar
González Hortigüela, Tecla, “Saraband, más allá del fantasma materno.” Trama & Fondo: Revista de Cultura 43 (2017): 143156.Google Scholar
Hassannia, Tina, Asghar Farhadi: Life and Cinema. Raleigh, NC: The Critical Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Higueras Flores, Rubén, and Serrano, Aarón Rodríguez. La Escritura (In)visible: 50 Películas Esenciales para Estudiar el Cine Clásico. Barcelona: UOC, 2018.Google Scholar
Horstkotte, Silke, “Seeing or Speaking: Visual Narratology and Focalization, Literature to Film.” In Narratology in the Age of Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Research, 170192. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Hühn, Peter, Schmid, Wolf, and Schönert, Jorg. Point of View, Perspective, and Focalization: Modeling Mediation in Narrative. Narratologia. New York: de Gruyter, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, “On Magic Realism in Film.” Critical Inquiry 12, no. 2 (1986): 301325. doi: 10.1086/448333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Andrea, Passing Time: An Essay on Waiting. New York: Upper West Side Philosophers, 2017.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006.Google Scholar
Loftalian, Mazyar, “The Contested Social Spaces of Film Practices since 2009 in Iran.” In Iranian Cinema in a Global Context: Policy, Politics and Form, ed. Decherney, Peter, and Atwood, Blake. London: Routledge, 2014, 213222.Google Scholar
Felici, Marzal, Javier, José, and Gómez Tarín, Francisco Javier. Diccionario de conceptos y términos audiovisuales. Madrid: Cátedra, 2015.Google Scholar
McKee, Robert, Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting. New York: Harper Collins, 1997.Google Scholar
Metz, Christian, Film Language: A Semiotics of Cinema. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.10.1515/9783110816044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Christian, El significante imaginario: psicoanálisis y cine. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.Google Scholar
Naficy, Hamid, A Social History of Iranian Cinema (Vol. 4): The Globalizing Era, 1984–2010. London: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Errando, Palao, Antonio, José, López, Antonio Loriguillo, and Romero, Teresa Sorolla. “Beyond the Screen, Beyond the Story: The Rhetorical Battery of Post-Classical Films.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video 35, no. 3 (2018): 122.Google Scholar
Pardo, José Luis, El cuerpo sin órganos: presentación de Gilles Deleuze. Valencia: Pre-Textos, 2011.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Serrano, Aarón, “Narrar el tiempo hacia la muerte: análisis fílmico de gritos y susurros (Viskningar Och Rop, Ingmar Bergman, 1972).” Communication & Society 30, no. 3 (2017): 1328. doi: 10.15581/003.30.3.13-28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Escalonilla, Antonio, Guión de aventura y forja del héroe. Madrid: Ariel, 2002.Google Scholar
Sclater, Shelley, The Uses of Narrative: Explorations in Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Zumalde, Imanol, La experiencia fílmica: cine, pensamiento y emoción. Madrid: Cátedra, 2011.Google Scholar
Zunzunegui, Santos, La Mirada Cercana. Microanálisis Fílmico. Edición Revisada y Aumentada. Santander: Shangrila, 2016.Google Scholar