Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:30:17.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide and Native Grass Seeding Effects on Sulfur Cinquefoil (Potentilla Recta)-Infested Grasslands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bryan A. Endress ,
Catherine G. Parks ,
Bridgett J. Naylor  and
Steven R. Radosevich
Bryan A. Endress*
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Catherine G. Parks
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850
Bridgett J. Naylor
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850
Steven R. Radosevich
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sulfur cinquefoil is an exotic, perennial forb that invades a wide range of ecosystems in western North America. It forms dense populations and often threatens native plant species and communities. In this study, we address the following questions: (1) what herbicides, rates, and application times are most effective at reducing sulfur cinquefoil abundance while having the least impact on native plants; and (2) does postherbicide seeding with native grass species increase native plant abundance? In 2002, we experimentally examined the effects of five herbicides (dicamba + 2,4-D; metsulfuron-methyl; triclopyr; glyphosate; and picloram) at two rates of application (low and high), three application times (early summer, fall, and a combined early summer–fall treatment), and two postherbicide seed addition treatments (seeded or not seeded) on sulfur cinquefoil abundance, plant community composition, and species richness. Experimental plots were monitored through 2005. Picloram was the most effective herbicide at reducing sulfur cinquefoil density, the proportion of remaining adult plants, and seed production. The effects of picloram continued to be evident after 3 yr, with 80% reduction of sulfur cinquefoil in 2005. In addition, seeding of native grass seeds alone (no herbicide application) reduced the proportion of sulfur cinquefoil plants that were reproductively active. Despite reductions in sulfur cinquefoil abundance, all treatments remained dominated by exotic species because treated areas transitioned from exotic forb- to exotic grass-dominated communities. However, a one-time herbicide application controlled sulfur cinquefoil for at least 3 yr, and therefore might provide a foundation to begin ecological restoration. Herbicide applications alone likely are to be insufficient for long-term sulfur cinquefoil control without further modification of sites through native grass or forb seeding. Integrating herbicides with native plant seeding to promote the development of plant communities that are resistant to sulfur cinquefoil invasion is a promising management approach to ecological restoration.

Keywords

Dicamba3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidGlyphosateN-(phosphonomethyl)glycineMetsulfuron-methyl2-[[[[94-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid, Picloram4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidTriclopyr[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidSulfur cinquefoil, Potentilla recta L.Rangelandrestorationspecies richnessplant community dynamicssulfur cinquefoilbunchgrass
Type
Research Articles
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 50 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Carlson, A. M. and Gorchov, D. L. 2004. Effects of herbicide on the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) and initial responses of native plants in a southwestern Ohio forest. Restor. Ecol. 12:559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwire, K. A., Parks, C. G., McInnis, M. L., and Naylor, B. J. 2006. Seed production and dispersal of sulfur cinquefoil in Northeast Oregon. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 59:63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, B. A., Naylor, B. N., and Parks, C. G. 2007. Landscape factors influencing the abundance and dominance of the invasive plant Potentilla recta . Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 60:218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, W. A. and Anderson, E. W. 1971. Grazing history of the Northwest. J. Range Manage. 24:6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. and Swanson, D. K. 2005. Bunchgrass Plant Communities of the Blue and Ochoco Mountains: A Guide for Managers. USDA Forest Service PNW-GTR-641. Pages 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G. 1954. Home Below Hell's Canyon. Lincoln, NE University of Nebraska Press. 246.Google Scholar
Laufenberg, S. M., Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Borkowski, J. 2005. Herbicide effects on density and biomass of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) and associated plant species. Weed Technol. 19:62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesica, P. and Martin, B. 2003. Effects of prescribed fire and season of burn on recruitment of the invasive exotic plant, Potentilla recta, in a semiarid grassland. Restor. Ecol. 11:516–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, B. J., Endress, B. A., and Parks, C. G. 2005. Multiscale detection of sulfur cinquefoil using aerial photography. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 58:447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, C. G., Radosevich, S. R., Endress, B. A., Naylor, B. J., Anzinger, D., Rew, L. J., Maxwell, B. D., and Dwire, K. A. 2005. Natural and land-use history of the Northwest mountain ecoregions (USA) in relation to patterns of plant invasions. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 7:137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. L., Parks, C. G., Dwire, K. A., Endress, B. A., and Johnson, K. L. 2006. Age structure and age-related performance of sulfur cinquefoil (Potentilla recta). Weed Sci. 54:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. W. 1996. Analysis of sulphur cinquefoil in British Columbia. Working Paper 16. Victoria, BC British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program. 36.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1993. Distribution and ecology of sulfur cinquefoil in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Final Report, Montana Noxious Weed Trust Fund Project. Helena, MT Montana Department of Agriculture. 11.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1999. Sulfur cinquefoil. Pages 382–387. in Sheley, R.L., Petroff, J.K., eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M., Toney, J. C., Bedunah, D. J., and Carlson, C. E. 1997. Plant community diversity and growth form responses to herbicide applications for control of Centaurea maculosa . J. Appl. Ecol. 34:1397–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Denny, M. K. 2006. Community response of nontarget species to herbicide application and removal of the nonindigenous invader Potentilla recta L. West. N. Am. Nat. 66:55–63.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Mangold, J. M., and Anderson, J. L. 2006. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive–plant-dominated rangeland. Ecol. Monogr. 76:365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuitele-Lewis, J. 2004. The Biology and Ecology of Potentilla recta in the Blue Mountains of Northeastern Oregon. MS Thesis. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University. 88.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., and Westbrooks, R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84:468–478.Google Scholar
Werner, P. A. and Soule, J. D. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds, 18: Potentilla recta L., P. norvegica L., and P. argentea L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:591–603.Google Scholar
Zouhar, K. 2003. Potentilla recta . http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/potrec/all.html. Accessed: September 6, 2007.Google Scholar