Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:22:45.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The territorial rights of legitimate states: a pluralist interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2014

Ayelet Banai
Ayelet Banai*
Affiliation:
School of Political Sciences, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 140 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneil, Barbara. 1992. “John Locke, Natural Law and Colonialism.” History of Political Thought 13(4):587–603.Google Scholar
Altman, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher H.. 2008. “From Humanitarian Intervention to Assassination: Human Rights and Political Violence.” Ethics 118(2):228–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher H.. 2009. A Liberal Theory of International Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennoune, Mahfoud. 1987. The Making of Contemporary Algeria 1830–1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2000. “Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World.” Ethics 110(4):697–721.Google Scholar
——Buchanan, Allen 2002. “Political Legitimacy and Democracy.” Ethics 112(4):689–719.Google Scholar
——Buchanan, Allen 2003. Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination. Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Georg. 2008. “Vitoria, Grotius, Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel: Accomplices of European Colonialism and Exploitation or True Cosmopolitans?” Journal of the History of International Law 10:181–209.Google Scholar
Fenton, William. 1998. The Great Law of the Longhouse: A Political History of the Iroquois Confederacy. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 1999. “Sovereignty in World Politics: A Glance at the Conceptual and Historical Landscape.” Political Studies 47(3):431–456.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert, and Rosberg, Carl. 1986. “Sovereignty and Underdevelopment: Juridical Statehood in the African Crisis.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 24(1):1–31.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. [1797] The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1993. “The Problematic Use of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant.” The Philosophical Forum 25:134–150.Google Scholar
——Kleingeld, Pauline 2007. “Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race.” The Philosophical Quarterly 57(229):573–592.Google Scholar
Kolers, Avery. 2012. “Attachment to Territory: Status or Achievement?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42(2):101–123.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephan D. 2001. “Rethinking the Sovereign State Model.” Review of International Studies 27(1):17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
——Miller, David 2012. “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification.” Political Studies 60(2):252–268.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar. 2003. Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 2005. “Humanitarian Imperialism.” Ethics and International Affairs 19:21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
——Nardin, Terry 2013. “Humanitarian Intervention.” In The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Lafollette Hugh, 2477–2486. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nine, Cara. 2008a. “A Lockean Theory of Territory.” Political Studies 56(1):148–165.Google Scholar
——Nine, Cara 2008b. “Territory is Not Derived From Property: A Response to Steiner.” Political Studies 56(4):957–963.Google Scholar
——Nine, Cara 2012. Global Justice and Territory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 1995. “Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History.” Journal of International Affairs 48:535–568.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 2006. Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2006/97.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel. 2008. “May Lockean Doughnuts Have Holes?” Political Studies 56(4):949–956.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2009. “Why Do States Have Territorial Rights?” International Theory 1(2):185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
——Stilz, Anna 2011. “Nations, States, and Territory.” Ethics 121(3):572–601.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1994. “Aboriginal Property and Western Theory: Recovering the Middle Ground.” Social Philosophy and Policy 11(2):153–180.Google Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2008. “Property Rights and the Resource Curse.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(1):2–32.Google Scholar