Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:31:15.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Otherwise than quantum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Sergei Prozorov*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
*
Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The paper focuses on two problems with Alexander Wendt's unification of physical and social ontology on the basis of quantum theory. Firstly, by endowing social phenomena with an ontological foundation in physical reality defined in quantum terms Wendt risks reducing a plurality of worlds as ‘fields of sense’, ordered by their immanent rules, to the physical world ordered by the laws of quantum theory. Secondly, by defining his quantum social science as an ontology Wendt risks excluding from consideration all that which violates ontological laws, yet may still be said to exist or take place: event, potentiality, and alterity. Although the advantages of a scientific ontology are indisputable, the price we pay for it is a sense of ontological captivity, whereby everything that is definitely is so, being and non-being rigorously distinguished and separated with nothing between them. This captivity may be escaped by supplementing quantum ontology with ethics in the Levinasian sense of ‘otherwise than being’.

Type
Book Symposium: Alexander Wendt, Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potentialities: Selected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1976. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2005. Being and Event. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2009. Logics of Worlds. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim, Hansen, Lene, and Wight, Colin. 2013. “The End of International Relations Theory?European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Markus. 2015. Why the World Does not Exist. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberley. 2022. “Empire and Insurgency: The Politics of Truth in Alexander Wendt's Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology.” International Theory 14 (1): 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1996. Basic Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 2003. On Escape. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Prozorov, Sergei. 2013. Ontology and World Politics: Void Universalism I. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2015. Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar