Article contents
Planning from the future: an emerging agenda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2012
Abstract
In the foreseeable future, it is more than likely that the types, dimensions, and dynamics of crisis drivers will increase dramatically, in some instances exponentially. While a growing number of organizations with humanitarian roles and responsibilities sense that such changes are afoot, few have looked at how these might fundamentally affect not only what they do but also how they do it. This article suggests that it is time for humanitarian organizations to look far more systematically at the transformational factors that will increase disaster vulnerabilities around the world and also the opportunities that exist to mitigate them. The article notes that some of the most transformative factors affecting humanitarian action will be the result of new political structures in the post-Western hegemonic world and the growing political centrality of humanitarian crises. The consequences of these and other transformative factors mean that those with humanitarian roles and responsibilities will have to be far more anticipatory and adaptive than is the case today. They will have to pay far greater attention to innovation and innovative practices and significantly expand the ways in which and with whom they collaborate.
- Type
- New Threats, New Responses
- Information
- International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 93 , Issue 884: The future of humanitarian action , December 2011 , pp. 939 - 963
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2012
References
1 The phrase ‘planning from the future’, besides being the title of this article, is the motto of the Humanitarian Futures Programme at King's College, London. It suggests an approach in which standard futures analysis, which normally depends upon trends analysis, is replaced by scenario analysis, which focuses upon the complex interplay of non-linear factors that in and of themselves do not necessarily reflect consistent patterns of behaviour.
2 Ramalingam, Ben, Aid on the Edge of Chaos, Oxford University Press, Oxford, forthcoming 2012.Google Scholar
3 Beinhocker, Eric, The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity and the Radical Remaking of Economics, Random House Business Books, London, 2005, p. 99Google Scholar.
4 Harry Jones, ‘Taking responsibility for complexity: how implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems’, Working Paper No. 330, Overseas Development Institute, London, June 2011, available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/6485.pdf (last visited 16 May 2012).
5 John Holmes, ‘New dimensions of collaboration and the corporate sector’, speech to the RedR/King's College London conference ‘Hard Realities and Future Necessities: The Role of the Private Sector in Humanitarian Efforts’, London, 3 December 2009, p. 12.
6 E. Beinhocker, above note 3, p. 378.
7 Harvey, Paul et al. , The State of the Humanitarian System: Assessing Performance and Progress: A Pilot Study, ALNAP/Overseas Development Institute, London, November 2010Google Scholar.
8 Chaitrong, Wichit, ‘Government policies threatening to aggravate natural disasters’, in The Nation, 26 September 2011, p. 2AGoogle Scholar.
9 Chandler, David, A History of Cambodia, 4th edition, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2008, p. 249Google Scholar.
10 Lorenz, Edward N., The Essence of Chaos, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Personal reflection of the author, who served as a member of the Council on Disaster Management of the World Economic Forum from 2011 to 2012.
12 ‘Nuclear energy: 2011 Japan nuclear crisis overview’, in New York Times, available at: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/atomic-energy/index.html (last visited 10 December 2011).
13 North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Lisbon Summit Declaration, 20 November 2010, para. 40, available at: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68828.htm (last visited 10 December 2011).
14 United States National Academy of Sciences, Severe Space Weather Events: Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008, pp. 17–18Google Scholar.
15 Kerr, Richard and Stone, Richard, ‘A human trigger for the great quake of Sichuan?’, in Science, 16 January 2009, Vol. 323, No. 5912, p. 322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. It should be said that not everyone is in agreement with the analysis of Kerr and Stone, including Deng, Kai, et al. , ‘Evidence that the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake Could Not Have Been Induced by the Zipingpu Reservoir’, in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, No. 1, November 2010, pp. 2805–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Note the preface by Michael Jones, UN Resident Coordinator, to the Humanitarian Futures Program (HFP) Report, Integrated Action Plan: A Phase One Analysis of the UN Country Team in Tajikistan, HFP, King's College, London, 2008, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/sites/default/files/IAP_Tajikistan_Report_Phase1.pdf (last visited 16 May 2012). Note also HFP, China Dialogue, and University College, London, The Waters of the Third Pole: Sources of Threat; Sources of Survival, HFP, King's College, London, May 2010, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/sites/default/files/Waters%20of%20the%20Third%20Pole.pdf (last visited 10 December 2011).
17 Onishi, Norimitsu and Fackler, Martin, ‘Japan held nuclear data, leaving evacuees in peril’, in The New York Times, 8 August 2011, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/world/asia/09japan.html?pagewanted=all (last visited 11 December 2011)Google Scholar.
18 Alpasalan, Can M. and Mitroff, Ian I., Swans, Swine, and Swindlers: Coping with the Growing Threat of Mega-crises and Mega-messes, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2008, pp. 37–38Google Scholar. According to these authors, ‘all crises are messy’ for three reasons: i) stakeholders who are affected define crises differently and often disagree over what is happening and why; ii) all crises contain a wide variety of issues, problems, and assumptions that must be handled simultaneously; iii) crises are not isolated events, and normally trigger chain reactions.
19 Ibid., p. 118.
20 House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Third Report: Scientific Advice and Evidence in Emergencies, March 2011, para. 110, available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/publications/ (last visited 16 May 2012).
21 Kent, Randolph, ‘Famine in the Horn of Africa: never again?’, in New Scientist, No. 2829, 14 September 2011, pp. 28–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Disaster Risk (IRDR), The FORIN Project: Forensic Investigations of Disasters (IRDR RIA Publication No. 1), October 2011, p. 6.
23 See ‘Foul Humanitarian Words’, a comment on the dangers of the misuse of the terms ‘practical’, ‘academic’, and ‘the field’ for humanitarian policy-makers, arising out of discussions at the Policy and Advocacy Group for Emergency Relief, Ottawa, Canada, 20 October 2011, HFP Newsletter, November–December 2011, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/newsletters/nov-dec11/foulwords (last visited 16 May 2012).
24 The difficulty for the policy-maker to move out of what might be described as his or her ‘comfort zone’ is suggested in a critique by Harvard University's Stanley Hoffmann of a recent work by the distinguished political analysts, Friedman, Thomas L. and Mandelbaum, Michael, That Used to Be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World It Invented And How We Can Come Back, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, 2011Google Scholar. Hoffmann notes that, despite the authors' recognition that the world has changed fundamentally and that the United States is now just another power in a world of multiple powers, they nevertheless fall back on the contradictory assumption of ‘American exceptionalism’, namely the uniqueness of the American experience, which would enable it to resume its role as global leader. In other words, it is difficult for even highly trained analysts to let go of fundamental assumptions, despite the implications of major transformational change. See Hoffmann, Stanley, ‘A cure for a sick country?’, in New York Review of Books, Vol. 58, No. 16, 27 October–9 November 2011Google Scholar.
25 Mahbubani, Kishore, ‘A letter to Netanyahu: time is no longer on Israel's side’, in Financial Times, 11 November 2011, p. 9Google Scholar, in which Professor Mahbubani, Dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, suggests that ‘shrinking [US] budgets will cut defence and aid expenditures … Countries will no longer hesitate to vote against American preferences.’ Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/15537caa-0bc8-11e1-9310-00144feabdc0.html (last visited 16 May 2012).
26 ‘[This is] not a recommendation in disguise for relativism, for tactical humanism does not believe in the equal claims of all possible moral worlds. It believes in producing values out of engaged debate’. Arjun Appadurai, ‘Tactical Humanism’, in Jerome Binde, The Future of Values, UNESCO, Paris, 2001, p. 18.
27 Personal communication, ICRC Geneva, 2004.
28 Walker, Peter and Maxwell, Daniel G., Shaping the Humanitarian World, Routledge, 2009Google Scholar.
29 Macrae, Joanna, ‘Understanding integration from Rwanda to Iraq’, in Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2004, pp. 29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Donini, Antonio, ‘The far side: the meta-functions of humanitarianism in a globalized world’, in Disasters, Vol. 34, Supplement S2, 2010, pp. S220–S237, available at: www.humansecuritygateway.com/documents/ISA_thefarside.pdf (last visited 10 December 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Annan, Kofi, ‘Two concepts of sovereignty’, in The Economist, 18 September 1999, pp. 49–50Google Scholar.
31 Fisher, David, ‘Domestic regulation of international humanitarian relief in disasters and armed conflicts: a comparative analysis’, in International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 866, June 2007, pp. 353–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
32 See Falk, Richard, ‘Dilemmas of sovereignty and intervention’, in Foreign Policy Journal, 18 July 2011, available at: http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/07/18/dilemmas-of-sovereignty-and-intervention/ (last visited December 2011)Google Scholar, who notes that the concept of sovereignty has all too often been a mechanism for legitimizing the space of states as a sanctuary for the commission of ‘human wrongs’. He also notes that the West has historically claimed rights of intervention ‘in the name of “civilization”’, normally in the non-West – a trend increasingly resisted.
33 Moises Naim, ‘Minilateralism: the magic number to get real international action’, in Foreign Policy, July/August 2009, available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/06/18/minilateralism?page=full (last visited 11 December 2011).
34 Malloch-Brown, Mark, The Unfinished Global Revolution: The Limits of Nations and the Pursuit of New Politics, Allen Lane, London, 2011Google Scholar.
35 Claire Shearman, ‘Communities, networks, creativity and culture: insights into localisation within globalisation’, in Michael Talalay, Chris Farrands, and Roger Tooze (eds), Technology, Culture and Competitiveness: Change and the World Political Economy, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2005.
36 Creac'h, Yves-Kim and Fan, Lillianne, ‘ASEAN's role in the Cyclone Nargis response: implications, lessons and opportunities’, in Humanitarian Exchange Magazine, Issue 41, December 2008, available at: http://www.odihpn.org/humanitarian-exchange-magazine/issue-41/aseans-role-in-the-cyclone-nargis-response-implications-lessons-and-opportunities (last visited 10 December 2011)Google Scholar.
37 Harford, Tim, Adapt: Why Success Always Starts With Failure, Little, Brown, London, 2011, p. 13Google Scholar.
38 ‘The point is to challenge our preconceptions about how things will develop – not to predict the future, but to give an array of future worlds that seem to flow from these assumptions’. Else, Liz, ‘Opinion interview: seizing tomorrow’, in New Scientist, 1 December 2001, pp. 43–44Google Scholar.
39 See E. N. Lorenz, above note 10.
40 Serrat, Oliver, Harnessing Creativity for New Solutions in the Workplace, Asian Development Bank, Knowledge Solutions no. 61, September 2009, p. 4Google Scholar.
41 The Royal Society, Climate Change: What We Know and What We Need to Know, Policy Document 22/02, August 2002, p. 7Google Scholar.
42 Courtney, Hugh, 20/20 Foresight: Crafting Strategy in an Uncertain World, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2001, p. 1Google Scholar.
43 Brian Goodwin, ‘In the shadow of culture’, in J. Brockman (ed.), The Next Fifty Years: Science in the First Half of the Twenty-first Century, Vintage Books, New York, 2002, p. 42.
44 The problem for many planners is that they assume that a plan must reflect relatively firm and fixed steps for a defined period of time. Hence, when one busy executive argued that anyone nowadays with a five or ten year plan is ‘probably crazy’, he implied that to plan one had to be relatively certain about the environment in which one was operating H. Courtney, above note 42, p. 160.
45 This is based upon a consultancy dealing with preparing for pandemics undertaken by this author in 2005.
46 Richard S. Olson and Juan Pablo Sarmiento, Communities of Practice and Disaster Risk Reduction (forthcoming). See also Etienne C. Wenger, ‘Communities of practice: a brief introduction’, available at: http://www.ewenger.com/theory/ (last visited 10 November 2008).
47 It is interesting to note that studies by the RAND Corporation and British Telecommunications Research suggest that technological change will be enhanced by ‘multidisciplinary trends and interactions’. See Anton, Philip S., The Global Technology Revolution: Bio/Nano/Materials Trends and their Synergies with Information Technology by 2013, prepared for the National Intelligence Council, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 2001, p. 35, available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1307.pdf (last visited 16 May 2012)Google Scholar. As Ian Pearson has said, ‘positive feedback’, or the way that technologies will inter-relate and interact, means that different technological disciplines will result in an acceleration of overall technological advance. See Pearson, Ian D., ‘What's next?’, in BT Technicology Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, October 2001, p. 101Google Scholar.
48 van der Vink, Gregory E., ‘Scientifically illiterate vs. politically clueless’, in Science, Vol. 276, 23 May 1997, p. 1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blockstein, David E., ‘How to lose your political virginity while keeping your scientific credibility’, in BioScience, Vol. 52, No. 1, January 2002, p. 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49 Personal communication, December 2003.
50 Stacey White, ‘Turning ideas into action: innovation within the humanitarian sector – a think-piece for the HFP Stakeholders Forum’, Humanitarian Futures Programme, King's College, London, 2008, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/sites/default/files/InnovationsThinkPiece.pdf (last visited 16 May 2012).
51 Roz Lasker, The Expert's Blindspot, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/tools/mediacent/film/experstblindspot (last visited 16 May 2012).
52 Leifer, Richard, et al. , Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2000Google Scholar.
53 Wolpert, John D., ‘Breaking out of the innovation box’, in Harvard Business Review, Special Innovation Edition, Vol. 80, No. 8, August 2002, p. 78Google ScholarPubMed.
54 Ibid., pp. 81 ff.
55 Mulgan, Geoff, The Art of Public Strategy: Mobilizing Power and Knowledge for the Common Good, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009Google Scholar.
56 See Kar, Kamal, with Chambers, Robert, Handbook on Community-led Total Sanitation, Plan International UK, London, 2008, available at: http://www.communityledtotalsanitation.org/resource/handbook-community-led-total-sanitation (last visited 12 December 2011)Google Scholar. See also King's College, Talking Science, Talking Sense, Humanitarian Futures Programme, London, 2011, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/content/talking-science-talking-sense (last visited 16 May 2012).
57 See, for example, P. Harvey et al., above note 7.
58 Burke, Joanne and Kent, Randolph, Commercial and Humanitarian Engagement in Crisis Contexts: Current Trends, Future Drivers, Humanitarian Futures Programme, King's College, London, June 2011, available at: http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/sites/default/files/Commercial%20and%20Humanitarian%20Engagement%20(EXEC%20SUMM.).pdf (last visited 17 May 2012)Google Scholar.
59 A study on the engagement of the private sector in humanitarian action is being led by the Humanitarian Futures Programme, King's College, London. It focuses on the role of global, regional, and national ‘platforms’ in supporting the private sector to play an effective humanitarian role. Historically, there have been multiple obstacles that have impeded private sector involvement in humanitarian action, including differences in terminology, methodologies, procedures, and timescales. As a result, ‘the debate rarely moves beyond general calls for more strategic collaboration with humanitarian actors and for a better understanding of the role and added-value of each sector. Therefore, this study will take this discussion to a new level, producing practical ways of “going beyond the problem” and options on the role that platforms can play in helping the private sector to engage more strategically in humanitarian action’ (see http://www.humanitarianfutures.org/content/supporting-private-sector-take-active-humanitarian-role-–-joanne-burke-partnerships-manager- (last visited 17 May 2012).
60 On 15 January 2010, the US Department of Homeland Security announced that it would grant certain Haitian nationals in the United States temporary legal status and permission to work, a designation known as ‘temporary protected status’. This, among other things, recognized the importance of maintaining the flow of remittances from the Haitian diaspora to their families in Haiti. Chishti, Muzaffar and Bergeron, Claire, ‘Haiti tragedy raises important immigration issues for the United States’, in Migration Information Source, 16 February 2010, Migration Policy Institute, Washington DC, available at: http://www.migrationinformation.org/USFocus/display.cfm?ID=771 (last visited 12 December 2011)Google Scholar.
61 Kent, Randolph and von Hippel, Karin, with Mark Bradbury, Social Facilitation, Development and the Diaspora: Support for Sustainable Health Services in Somalia, Report for the US Agency for International Development, International Policy Institute, King's College, London, November 2004, available at: http://csis.org/images/stories/pcr/04_hippel_somalia.pdf (last visited 17 May 2012)Google Scholar.
62 Amartya Sen, ‘The man without a plan’, in Foreign Affairs, March/April 2006, available at: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/61525/amartya-sen/the-man-without-a-plan (last visited 10 December 2011).
- 4
- Cited by