Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:50:19.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Capitalism and Agrestic Unfreedom*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2009

Utsa Patnaik
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The proposition is not new that the freedom of labour is not a necessary accompaniment of the growth of capitalist production; and that conditions of non-market duress upon labour ranging from outright slavery to indenture and restrictions on mobility have been a typical feature of the world-wide growth of capitalism. Indeed the very title of Eric Williams' seminal book Capitalism and Slavery, which explored the interlinkages between the rise of capitalist manufacturing industry in Britain and the exploitation of the slave labour-based plantation system of the West Indies, exemplified this understanding. Ernest Mandel in his Marxist Economic Theory, which in fact dealt as much with historical description as with theory, also analysed the role of duress in the operation of the colonial system, as did P. A. Baran in his Political Economy of Growth. To the present author who shares Williams's perception, in particular that the colonial system and the later working of imperialism were crucially dependent on the imposition of unfree conditions upon Third World labour (particularly wherever labour migration was induced), Tom Brass's general emphasis on the lack of correspondence between capitalism and freedom of labour seems quite unexceptionable.

Type
Suggestions and Debates
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , April 1995 , pp. 77 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1995

References

1 Williams, E., Capitalism and Slavery (New York, 1944)Google Scholar.

2 Mandel, E., Marxist Economic Theory (London, 1968)Google Scholar.

3 Baran, P. A., The Political Economy of Growth (New Delhi, 1968, , Indian ed.)Google Scholar.

4 Patnaik, P. (ed.), Lenin and Imperialism (New Delhi, 1986)Google Scholar.

5 Frank, A. G., Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America (London, 1971), P. 268Google Scholar.

6 Patnaik, U. and Dingwaney, M., Chains of Servitude: Bondage and Slavery in India (Madras, 1985)Google Scholar.

7 Keynes, J. M., Treatise on Money. Vol. 2, The Applied Tlxeory of Money (in Collected Works, vol. 6) (Cambridge and London, 1971)Google Scholar.

8 Moore, B., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (London, 1967)Google Scholar.

9 P. Patnaik, Accumulation and Stability under Capitalism (Oxford, forthcoming).

10 Marx, K., “Population, Crime and Pauperism”, in Collected Works of Marx and Engels, vol. 16 (Moscow, 1980)Google Scholar (originally pub. in New York Daily Tribune, September 1859).

11 Habib, S., “Colonial Exploitation and Capital Formation in England in the Early Stages of Industrial Revolution”, Proceedings of the Indian Historical Congress, Aligath 1975, Section 4Google Scholar.

12 Deane, P. and Cole, W. A., British Economic Growth 1688–1959: Trends and Structure, Dept of Applied Economics Monograph 8 (Cambridge, 1969)Google Scholar.

13 Marx, K., A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (London, 1971)Google Scholar.

14 Luxemburg, R., The Accumulation of Capital (London, 1963)Google Scholar.

15 Brass, “Some Observations on Unfree Labour”, p. 269.

16 Sen, S., Colonies and Empire (New Delhi, 1992)Google Scholar.

17 Lenin, V. I., The Agrarian Programme of Social Democracy in the First Russian Revolution (Collected Works, vol. 13) (Moscow, 1972)Google Scholar.

18 Bhadhuri, A., “Agricultural Backwardness under Semi Feudalism”, The Economic Journal 83 (1973), pp. 120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Bhaduri, A., The Economic Structure of Backward Agriculture (London, 1983)Google Scholar.