Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:49:38.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leading the White-Collar Union: Clive Jenkins, the Management of Trade-Union Officers, and the Politics of the British Labour Movement, c.1968–1979

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2004

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The growth of white-collar unionism and its impact on British trade unions in the postwar period has received little attention from social historians. Radical critics have noted the failure of Clive Jenkins to provide a clear lead in defending workers' conditions, while mainstream, institutionalist commentators more often stress the diversity of specific interests served by such unions. Recent research has called into question earlier models of union governance, though there remain few studies of the history of officer relations within trade unions. This article examines the leadership of ASTMS in the decade after its formation. It is argued that the strategies pursued by Jenkins, including the recruitment, training, and deployment of fieldworkers, were guided by accumulated knowledge and culture (as well as brilliant opportunism) rather than by the structure of the union or the composition of the membership. In offering educated officers a career structure, ASTMS increased its capacity for expertise and effective communication without descending into the political sectarianism of the postwar years. The charismatic, capricious style adopted by Jenkins, as well as the difficulties of absorbing a diverse membership in this period of rapid growth, contributed to the tensions which culminated in a series of struggles between the union and its bargainers during the 1970s.

Type
ARTICLE
Copyright
© 2004 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: The research on which these articles are based was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and by the Arts and Humanities Research Board. I am indebted to present and former members of the ASTMS and MSF-Amicus who contributed to my research, including those identified as interviewees. In particular, the late Clive Jenkins, the late Will Rowe, Baroness Turner, and Gary Morton generously shared original documents with me as well as consenting, as did many others, to be interviewed. The staff of the Modern Record Centre, Warwick University, and the BBC Written Archives Centre, Caversham, provided patient assistance. Critical comments were provided by Alan Booth, Mark Bufton, Bob Carter, John Fisher, Don Groves, David Lyddon, Paul Smith, Andrew Thorpe and the editors of IRSH.