Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:27:58.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS): a multicultural cognitive assessment scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2004

Joella E. Storey
Affiliation:
Geriatrics Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Jeffrey T. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
Geriatrics Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
David A. Conforti
Affiliation:
Geriatrics Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Hugh G. Dickson
Affiliation:
Geriatrics Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia Aged Care and Rehabilitation, University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a simple method for detecting dementia that is valid across cultures, portable and easily administered by primary health care clinicians.

Design: Culture and Health Advisory Groups were used in Stage 1 to develop culturally fair cognitive items. In Stage 2, clinical testing of 42 items was conducted in a multicultural sample of consecutive new referrals to the geriatric medicine outpatient clinic at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia (n=166). In Stage 3, the predictive accuracy of items was assessed in a random sample of community-dwelling elderly persons stratified by language background and cognitive diagnosis and matched for sex and age (n=90).

Measurements: A research psychologist administered all cognitive items, using interpreters when needed. Each patient was comprehensively assessed by one of three geriatricians, who ordered relevant investigations, and implemented a standardized assessment of cognitive domains. The geriatricians also collected demographic information, and administered other functional and cognitive measures. DSM-IV criteria were used to assign cognitive diagnoses. Item validity and weights were assessed using frequency and logistic regression analyses. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine overall predictive accuracy of the RUDAS and the best cut-point for detecting cognitive impairment.

Results: The 6-item RUDAS assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, praxis, language, judgement, drawing and body orientation. It appears not to be affected by gender, years of education, differential performance factors and preferred language. The area under the ROC curve for the RUDAS was 0.94 (95% CI 0.87–0.98). At a cut-point of 23 (maximum score of 30), sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 98%, respectively. Inter-rater (0.99) and test-retest (0.98) reliabilities were very high.

Conclusions: The 6-item RUDAS is portable and tests multiple cognitive domains. It is easily interpreted to other languages, and appears to be culturally fair. However, further validation is needed in other settings, and in longitudinal studies to determine its sensitivity to change in cognitive function over time.

Type
2003 IPA RESEARCH AWARDS FIRST-PRIZE WINNER
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: PDF

RUDAS Booklet

Storey et al. Supplementary Material

Download RUDAS Booklet(PDF)
PDF 4.9 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

RUDAS Scale

Storey et al. Supplementary Material

Download RUDAS Scale(PDF)
PDF 939.6 KB