Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T12:30:10.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ageism: can a museum exhibit make a difference?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2020

Moran Fruhauf
Affiliation:
Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 31905
Israel (Issi) Doron*
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Study of Ageing (CRSA), University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 31905
Yuval Palgi
Affiliation:
Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 31905
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Israel (Issi) Doron, Center for Research and Study of Ageing (CRSA), University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 31905. Fax: 972-4-8240573. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Ageism is a key challenge to today’s aging societies. “Dialogue with Time” is an original Israeli interactive museum exhibit that aims to change negative ageist attitudes by creating a meaningful and stereotype-breaking encounter between visitors and old age. The objective of this study was to examine whether the exhibition reduces ageist attitudes among its visitors. The study employed a comparative pre-post structure with a comparison group. A closed-answer questionnaire was supplied to 100 participants in the experimental group, visitors to the “Dialogue with Time” exhibit, and to 100 participants in the control group. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire before entering the exhibits and again after experiencing them. Changes in the level of ageism were measured using the Farboni Scale of Ageism. A significant reduction in ageism attitudes was shown in the experimental group when comparing before and after the visit, t(91) = 11.75, p = 0.001, with a good effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.50, whereas in the control group there was no significant change, t(76) = 0.05, p = 0.95, and a weak effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.00. The findings indicate that combating ageism can also be sustained by means of museum exhibits. We recommend that museums and other similar public institutions (e.g. art galleries, exhibition halls) use public spaces to advance multigenerational exposure to positive images of aging.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayalon, L. and Tesch-Romer, C. (2018). Introduction to the section: researching ageism. In: Ayalon, L. and Tesch-Romer, C. (Eds.), Contemporary Perspective on Ageism (pp. 383402). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodner, E., Bergman, Y. S. and Cohen, F. S. (2012). Different dimension of ageist attitudes among men and women: a multigenerational perspective. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 895901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610211002936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4, Part 1), 243246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R. and Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA): an attempt of more precise measurement of ageism. Canadian Journal on Ageing, 9, 5556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800016093.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. N., Larsen, L. and Solem, P. E. (2009). A conceptual analysis of ageism. Nordic Psychology, 6, 422. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.3.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, L. (2006). Measuring the impact of museums on their communities: the role of the 21st century museum. Paper presented at the International Committee for Museum Management (INTERCOM). Annual meeting, Taiwan, TPC.Google Scholar
Lytle, A. and Levy, S. R. (2017). Reducing ageism: education about aging and extended contact with older adults. The Gerontologist, 59, 580588. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar