Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:54:44.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Alícia Adserà  and
Carles Boix
Get access

Abstract

Politics remains prominently absent in the literature showing that higher levels of trade integration lead to a larger public sector. As openness increases, the state, acting as a social planner, adopts a salient role to minimize the risks of economic integration and secure social peace. Given the highly redistributive nature of both trade and fiscal policies, we claim, however, that the interaction of the international economy and domestic politics leads to three distinct political-economic equilibria. First, nations may embrace protectionist policies to shore up the welfare of key domestic sectors—without engaging, therefore, in substantial public spending. Second, to maintain trade openness in democracies, policymakers develop compensation policies to muster the support of the losers of openness. Finally, given the tax burden of public compensation, pro-free trade sectors may impose an authoritarian regime to exclude (instead of buying off) their opponents. After formally stating the conditions under which each regime emerges, we test the model on a panel data of around sixty-five developing and developed nations in the period 1950–1990 and explore its implications through a set of key historical cases drawn from the last two centuries.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , Spring 2002 , pp. 229 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Rodrik, Dani. 1991. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper Series 3668. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E. 1985. Political Parties, World Demand, and Unemployment: Domestic and International Sources of Economic Activity. American Political Science Review 79 (4):1016–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James, Frieden, Jeffry, Gilligan, Michael J., Rodrik, Dani, and Rogowski, Ronald. 1996. The Political Economy of International Trade: Enduring Puzzles and an Agenda for Inquiry. Comparative Political Studies 29 (6):689–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, José Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. Classifying Political Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (2):3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Miranda, Berta. 1996. El sur de Europa y la adhesión a la Comunidad: los debates políticos. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas—Siglo Veintiuno de España Editores.Google Scholar
Aukrust, Odd. 1977. Inflation in the Open Economy: A Norwegian Model. In Worldwide Inflation: Theory and Recent Practice, edited by Krause, Lawrence B. and Salant, Walter S., 109–26. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Brock, Philip, and Tiefenthaler, Jill. 1991. Risk and Trade Regimes: Another Exploration. International Organization 45 (1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review 89 (3):634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blewett, Neal. 1972. The Peers, the Parties, and the People: The British General Elections of 1910. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth, and Equality. Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2001. Democracy, Development, and the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Garicano, Luis. 2001. Democracy, Inequality, and Country-Specific Wealth. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 72 (4): 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campillo, Marta, and Miron, Jeffrey A.. 1997. Why Does Inflation Differ Across Countries? In Reducing Inflation: Motivation and Strategy, edited by Romer, Christina D. and Romer, David H., chap. 9, 335–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1985. The Working Class and Welfare: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890–1980. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1989. Social Protection by Other Means: Australia's Strategy of Coping with External Vulnerability. In The Comparative History of Public Policy, edited by Castles, Francis G., chap. 2, 6–52. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corkill, David. 1999. The Development of the Portuguese Economy: A Case of Europeanization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cutright, Phillips. 1965. Political Structure, Economic Development, and National Social Security Programs. American Journal of Sociology 70 (5):537–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deininger, Klaus, and Squire, Lyn. 1996. A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality. World Bank Economic Review 10 (3):565–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donges, Juergon B. 1971. From an Autarchic Toward a Cautiously Outward-Looking Industrialization Policy: The Case of Spain. In The Economic Development of Spain since 1870, edited by Martín-Aceña, Pablo and Simpson, James, 350–89. Aldershot, U.K.: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gösta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A., and Romer, David. 1999. Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review 89 (3):379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., and Rogowski, Ronald. 1996. The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, edited by Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen V., chap. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter A. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander M. 1994. Introduction to Pooling. In The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, edited by Janoski, Thomas and Hicks, A. M., 169–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander M., and Swank, Dwane. 1992. Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review 86 (3):658–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsey, Cheryl M., and Borcherding, Thomas E.. 1997. Why Does Government's Share of National Income Grow? An Assessment of the Recent Literature on the U.S. Experience. In Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, edited by Mueller, Dennis C., 562–89. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Anthony. 1997. Free Trade and Liberal England, 1846–1946. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Cheng. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyn, Ragin, Charles, and Stephens, John D.. 1993. Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3):711–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen V., eds. 1996. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jong-Wha. 1993. International Trade, Distortions, and Long-Run Economic Growth. IMF Staff Papers. 40:299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1):69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbett, Deborah. 1995. Trade, Employment, and Welfare: A Comparative Study of Trade and Labour Market Policies in Sweden and New Zealand, 1880–1980. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Maravall, José María. 1995. Los resultados de la democracia: un estudio del sur y el este de Europa. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wolfgang. 1984. Endogenous Tariff Formation. American Economic Review 74 (5):970–85.Google Scholar
McKibbin, Ross, Matthew, Colin, and Kay, John. 1990. The Franchise Factor in the Rise of the Labour Party. In The Ideologies of Class: Social Relations in Britain, edited by McKibbin, Ross, 66–100. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89 (5):914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. Various years. OECD National Accounts. Main Aggregates. 1960–89. Washington, D.C.: OECD.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. Modernization: Theories and Facts. World Politics 49 (2):155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy 106 (5):997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, David. 1993. Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (4):869–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1991. Lessons in Lobbying for Free Trade in 19th-century Britain: To Concentrate or Not. American Political Science Review 85 (1):37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, Geoffrey R. 1992. The Liberal Party: Triumph and Disintegration, 1886–1929. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Robert, and Heston, Alan. 1988. A New Set of International Comparisons of Real Product and Price Levels: Estimates for 130 Countries, 1950–1985. Review of Income and Wealth 34 (1):l–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. Various years. National Accounts. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. Various years. World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar