Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:58:56.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The International Court of Justice: Its Role in Contemporary International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Max Sørensen
Get access

Extract

In his concluding volume in the Carnegie Endowment's series of National Studies on International Organization, Professor Maclver observes that the International Court of Justice, as set up in 1945, was not so much a new institution as a new promise. It was closely modelled on its predecessor, the Permanent Court of International Justice, and Article 92 of the UN Charter expressly recognized the continuity with the past in affirming that the Statute of the new Court was based upon chat of the old one. The promise lay in the fact that the new Court was declared to be “the principal judicial organ of the United Nations” and thus called upon to play a more significant role than the old Court, which had never been an organic part of the League of Nations structure. Professor Maclver concludes, however, that the promise remains in important respects unfulfilled.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Spring 1960 , pp. 261 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Maclver, Robert M., The Nations and the United Nations, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, National Studies on International Organization, New York, Manhatta n Publishing Company, 1959, p. 132Google Scholar.

2 Rosenne, Shabtai, The International Court of Justice, New York, Central Book Company, Inc., 1957, p. 577Google Scholar.

3 General Assembly Official Records (12th session), 695th Plenary Meeting, October 1, 1957Google Scholar; cf. Document A/3653, p. 3

4 Institut de Droit International, Annuaire, 1952, Session de Sienne (Vol. 44, No. 2), p. 439–455Google Scholar.

5 SirLauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court, London, Stevens and Sons Ltd., 1958, Chapter 9Google Scholar.

6 General Assembly Official Records (13th session), Special Political Committee, 114th and 115th meetings, November 27 and 28, 1958, and ibid. (14th session), Special Political Committee, 127th–139th meetings, October 13–30, 1959.

7 General Assembly Resolution 1404 (xiv), November 30, 1959.

8 Rosenne, , op. cit., p. 231–235Google Scholar.

9 Russell, Ruth B. and Merther, Jeannette E., A History of the United Nations Charter, Washington, Brookings Institution, 1958, p. 884–890Google Scholar.

10 See Hambro, Edvard, “The Jurisdiction of the Inter -national Court of Justice,” in Académic de Droit International, Recueil des Cours, 1950 (Vol. 76, No. 1), p. p125 ffGoogle Scholar.

11 Habicht, Max, Post-war Treaties for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1931Google Scholar; and Systematic Survey of Treaties for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes 1928–1948, United Nations, 1948 (1949 V 3)Google Scholar.

12 l.C.J. Yearbook J957–58, p. 269–304.

13 Hudson, Manley O., The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920–1942, New York, 1943, p. 482Google Scholar.

14 See Waldoclc, C. H. M., “The Decline of the Optional Clause,” British Yearbook of International Law, 1955–1956 (Vol. 32), p. 244–287Google Scholar.

15 Briggs, Herbert W., “Reservations to the Acceptance of Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice”, in Academic de Droit International, Recueil del Corns, 1958 (Vol. 93, No. 1), p. 229–365Google Scholar.

16 I.C.J. Reports 1957, p. 141–144.

17 l.C.J.Reports 1952, p. 93 ff.

18 For complete text of the United States declaration, dated August 26, 1946, see I.C.J. Yearbook 1946–47, p. 217. See also Briggs, , op. cit., p. 328 ffGoogle Scholar. Waldock, C. H. M., “The Plea of Domestic Jurisdiction before International Legal Tribunals”, British Yearbook of International Law, 1954 (Vol. 31), p. 96 ff., 131–137Google Scholar.

20 I.C.J. Reports 1957, p. 34 ff.

21 I.C.J. Reports 1957, p. 9 ff.

22 I.C.J. Reports 1959, p. 6 ff., 26.

23 Ibid., p. 54 ff., 75 ff., 85 ff., 95 ff. For a detailed commentary on the decision see Herbert Briggs, W., “Interhandel: Th e Court's Judgment of March 21, 1959” American Journal of International Law, 07 1959 (Vol. 53, No. 3), p. 547–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 I.C.J. Reports 1948, p. 15; see also Rosenne, , op. cit., p. 284–302Google Scholar, and Waldock, C. H. M., “Forum Prorogatum”, International Law Quarterly, 1948 (Vol. 2), p. 377–391Google Scholar.

25 I.C.J. Reports 1956, p. 12, 15.

26 See I.C.J. Reports 1954, p. 99, 103; I.C.J. Reports 1956, p. 6, 9; and I.C.J. Reports 1958, p. 158.

27 Cf. Department of State, Press Release No. 610, October 13, 1958.

28 Rosenne, , op. cit., p. 240 ffGoogle Scholar.

29 Conference on the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency, 1956, Document IAEA/CS/-OR.33, p. 71 (delegate of the United Kingdom).

30 Rosenne, , op. cit., p. 450–452Google Scholar, lists the organs authorized to request advisory opinions.

31 Case concerning interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania (Human Rights clauses). See Goodrich, Leland M. and Simons, Anne P., The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security, Washington, Brookings Institution, 1955, p. 159Google Scholar.

32 I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 215 ff.

33 Rosenne, , op. cit., p. 486Google Scholar.

34 I.C.J. Reports 1956, p. 77.

35 Gross, Leo, ‘Participation of Individuals in Advisory Proceedings before the International Court of Justice: Question of Equality between the Parties,’ American Journal of International Law, 1958 (Vol. 52, No. 1), p. 16–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 See Valentine, D. G., The Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Community, The Hague, 1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Basdevaot, Judge, “La place et le role de la justice Internationale”, in Les Affaires Etrangeres, published by Centre de sciences politiques de l'lnstitut d'Etudcs Juridiques de Nice, 1959, p. 548Google Scholar.

38 Académic de Droit International de la Haye, Recueit des Cours, 1947 (Vol. 70, No. 1), p. 441Google Scholar.

39 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1957 (Vol. I), p. 155Google Scholar; cf. Jennings, R. Y. in British Yearbook of International Law, 1958 (Vol. 34), p. 350–354Google Scholar.

40 Ibid., p. 158.

41 Text of notes in Nordisk Tidsskrift for Interna tional Ret, 1951 (Vol. 21), p. D 17–20Google Scholar.

42 SirMcNair, Arnold Duncan (later Lord), The Development of International Justice, New York, 1954. p. 32Google Scholar; Goodrich, and Simons, , op. cit., p. 64 ff., 608 ffGoogle Scholar.

43 See Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, The International Law by the International Court, lar Part III, “Judicial Legislation.”

44 British Yearbook of International Law, 1958 (Vol. 34), p. 446Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., p. 56.

46 The New York Times, November 27, 1959, 1:8, 15:1–4.

47 Department of State Bulletin, 01 (Vol. 42, No. 1074), p. 118Google Scholar; see also p. 128–130.