Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:21:56.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Transgovernmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2008

Abraham L. Newman
Abraham L. Newman
Affiliation:
Edmund Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Democratic nations have long struggled to set the proper balance between individual freedom and government control. The rise of digital communications networks, market integration, and international terrorism has transformed many national civil liberties issues into important international debates. The European Union was among the first jurisdictions to manage these new transnational civil liberties with the adoption of a data privacy directive in 1995. The directive substantially expanded privacy protection within Europe and had far-reaching consequences internationally. While international relations scholars have paid considerable attention to the global ramifications of these rules, research has not yet explained the origins of the European data privacy directive. Given the resistance from the European Commission, powerful member states, and industry to their introduction, the adoption of supranational rules presents a striking empirical puzzle. This article conducts a structured evaluation of conventional approaches to European integration—liberal intergovernmentalism and neofunctionalism—against the historical record and uncovers an alternative driver: transgovernmental actors. These transgovernmental actors are endowed with power resources—expertise, delegated political authority, and network ties—that they employ to promote their regional policy goals. This article uses the historical narrative of the data privacy directive to explain the origins of a critical piece of international civil liberties legislation and to advance a theoretical discussion about the role of transgovernmental actors as policy entrepreneurs within the multilevel structure of the European Union.An earlier version of this article was presented at the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 28–31 August 2003. I would like to thank David Bach, Tim Büthe, Burkard Eberlein, Pat Egan, Henry Farrell, Orfeo Fioretos, Jane Gingrich, Virginia Haufler, Jonah Levy, Kate McNamara, Sophie Meunier, Craig Pollack, Mark Pollack, Elliot Posner, Kathryn Sikkink, Wolfgang Streeck, Steve Weber, Nick Ziegler, and John Zysman for extensive comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by the Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy and the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 103 - 130
Copyright
© 2008 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aalberts, Tanja E. 2004. The Future of Sovereignty in Multilevel Governance Europe—A Constructivist Reading. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1):23–46.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Peter M. Haas. 1992. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46 (1):367–90.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 1998. Explaining National Court Acceptance of European Court Jurisprudence: A Critical Evaluation of Theories of Legal Integration. In The European Court and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence, edited by Anne-Marie Slaughter, Alec Stone Sweet, and Joseph Weiler, 227–52. Oxford, England: Hart.
Anderson, Jeffrey J. 1995. The State of the (European) Union: From the Single Market to Maastricht, from Singular Events to General Theories. World Politics 47 (3):441–65.Google Scholar
Bach, David, and Abraham Newman. 2007. The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-Institutions and Macro-Influence. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (4):827–46.Google Scholar
Bache, Ian, and Matthew V. Flinders, eds. 2004. Multi-Level Governance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, Michael N., and Raymond Duvall, eds. 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Bennett, Colin 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Bermann, George. 1993. Regulatory Cooperation with Counterpart Agencies Abroad: The FAA's Aircraft Certification Experience. Law and Policy of International Business 24:669–781.Google Scholar
Bignami, Francesca. 2005. Transgovernmental Networks vs. Democracy: The Case of the European Information Privacy Network. Michigan Journal of International Law 26:806–68.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. 1998. Organizing Babylon: On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. Public Administration 76 (2):253–73.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Madeleine O. Hosli. 2003. Brussels between Bern and Berlin: Comparative Federalism Meets the European Union. Governance 16 (2):179–202.Google Scholar
Burley, Ann-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (1):41–76.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2002. Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence. American Political Science Review 96 (3):481–93.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Crane, Barbara. 1984. Policy Coordination by Major Western Powers in Bargaining with the Third World: Debt Relief and the Common Fund. International Organization 38 (3):399–428.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud. 1997. Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (2):246–61.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In Institutional Patterns and Organization: Culture and Environment, edited by Lynne G. Zucker, 3–21. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Eberlein, Burkard, and Abraham Newman. 2008. Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union. Governance 21 (1):25–52.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2003. Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce: The EU–U.S. Safe Harbor Arrangement. International Organization 57 (2):277–306.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2006. Governing Information Flows: States, Private Actors, and E-Commerce. Annual Review of Political Science 6:353–74.Google Scholar
Flaherty, David H. 1989. Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies: The Federal Republic of Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, and the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Fligstein, Neil. 2001. Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. Sociological Theory 19 (2):105–25.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and Iona Mara-Drita. 1996. How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union. American Journal of Sociology 102 (1):1–33.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2004. What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? American Political Science Review 98 (2):341–54.Google Scholar
Gesellschaft für Datenschutz und Datensicherung. 1992. Erhebung über die möglichen Auswirkungen der geplanten EG-Datenschutzrichtlinie auf die Wirtschaft. Paper presented at DAFTA, November, Königswinter, Germany.
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2005. The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):84–101.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Hall, Peter A. 2003. Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Reuschemeyer, 372–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haufler, Virginia. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Heisenberg, Dorothee. 2005. Negotiating Privacy: The European Union, the United States, and Personal Data Protection. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
Héritier, Adrienne. 2001. Overt and Covert Institutionalization in Europe. In The Institutionalization of Europe, edited by Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein, 56–70. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Héritier, Adrienne. 2002. Public-Interest Services Revisited. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (6):995–1019.Google Scholar
Hondius, Frederik Willem. 1975. Emerging Data Protection in Europe. New York: American Elsevier.
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2000. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Md.: Rowan & Littlefield.
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2003. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review 97 (2):233–43.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Raymond F. 1976. The International Role of ‘Domestic’ Bureaucracy. International Organization 30 (3):405–32.Google Scholar
Jabko, Nicolas. 2003. The Political Foundations of the European Regulatory State. In The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, edited by Jacint Jordana and David Levi-Faur, 200–17. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
Jabko, Nicolas. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Jeffery, Charlie. 2000. Sub-National Mobilization and European Integration: Does It Make Any Difference? Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (1):1–23.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye. 1974. Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations. World Politics 27 (1):39–62.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper-Collins.
Kohler-Koch, Beate, and Berthold Rittberger. 2006. Review Article: The “Governance Turn” in EU Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (Suppl.):27–49.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, Friedrich. 1989. Europäische Datenschutznormen aus sicht der Deutschen Industrie. Paper presented at DAFTA, November, Königswinter, Germany.
Lavenex, Sandra. 2006. Shifting Up and Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control. West European Politics 29 (2):329–50.Google Scholar
Long, William J., and Marc Pang Quek. 2002. Personal Data Privacy Protection in an Age of Globalization: The US–EU Safe Harbor Compromise. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3):325–44.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2003. Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 337–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Majone, Giandomenico. 1996. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
Mattli, Walter, and Tim Büthe. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? World Politics 56 (1):1–42.Google Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen R. 1999. Consensus and Constraint: Ideas and Capital Mobility in European Monetary Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (3):455–76.Google Scholar
Mogg, John. 1991. Initiatives taken by the European Communities in the field of data protection: New Developments. Remarks presented at the 13th Conference of the Data Protection Commissioners, October, Strasbourg, France.
Mogg, John. 1994. Privacy Protection in the Information Society. Transnational Data and Communications Report, November/December, 29–32.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4):473–524.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation. International Organization 53 (2):267–306.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham, and John Zysman. 2006. Transforming Politics in the Digital Era. In How Revolutionary Was the Digital Revolution?: National Responses, Market Transitions, and Global Technology, edited by John Zysman and Abraham Newman, 391–411. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Padgett, John, and Chris Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98 (6):1259–319.Google Scholar
Papapavlou, George. 1992. Latest Developments Concerning the EC Draft Data Protection Directives. In Recent Developments in Data Privacy Law, edited by Jan Dumortier, 29–57. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Pearce, Graham, and Nicholas Platten. 1998. Achieving Personal Data Protection in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):529–547.Google Scholar
Perkmann, Markus. 2007. Policy Entrepreneurship and Multi-Level Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions. Environment and Planning C 25 (6):861–879.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 1995. Policy Networks and European Union Policy-Making: A Reply to Kassim. West European Politics 18 (2):389–407.Google Scholar
Platten, Nick. 1996. Background to and History of the Directive. In EC Data Protection Directive, edited by David Bainbridge, 13–32. London: Butterworths.
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of Integration? Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Elliot. 2005. Sources of Institutional Change: The Supranational Origins of Europe's New Stock Markets. World Politics 58 (1):1–40.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 2002. The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law. Virginia Journal of International Law 43 (1):1–92.Google Scholar
Richards, John E. 1999. Toward a Positive Theory of International Institutions: Regulating International Aviation Markets. International Organization 53 (1):1–37.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Actors Back. In Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandholtz, Wayne, and John Zysman. 1989. 1992: Recasting the European Bargain. World Politics 42 (1):95–128.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):47–80.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1998. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Simitis, Spiros. 1995. From the Market to the Polis: The EU Directive on the Protection of Personal Data. Iowa Law Review 80 (3):445–69.Google Scholar
Simitis, Spiros. 1997. Data Protection in the European Union—The Quest for Common Rules. Courses of the Academy of European Law 8 (1):95–141.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 2000. Governing the Global Economy through Government Networks. In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Michael Byers, 177–205. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Michael E. 2004. Europe's Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone Sweet, Alec, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein, eds. 2001. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, James. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Verdun, Amy. 1999. The Role of the Delores Committee in the Creation of EMU: An Epistemic Community? Journal of European Public Policy 6 (2):308–28.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Vogel, Steven Kent. 1996. Freer Markets More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Wuermeling, Ulrich U. 1996. Harmonisation of European Union Privacy Law. John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law 14 (3):411–60.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Nicholas J. 1995. Institutions, Elites, and Technological Change in France and Germany. World Politics 47 (3):341–72.Google Scholar
Zito, Anthony R. 2001. Epistemic Communities, Collective Entrepreneurship and European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (4):585–603.Google Scholar