Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:44:26.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2005

Jan Beyers
Jan Beyers
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Neofunctional, supranationalist, and constructivist scholars studying European integration hypothesize that social interactions cutting across national borders lead individual actors to shift their allegiance toward the European level. This strong socialization hypothesis presumes that, as a result of prolonged exposure and interactions, individuals adopt role conceptions that promote a sense of “we-ness” and that fit into a view of the European Union (EU) as an autonomous level primarily designed for finding policy solutions in the interest of a common, European, good. In contrast, this article offers an institutional understanding of role enactment that argues that socialization—that is, the adoption of role conceptions—is considerably shaped by actors' embeddedness in multiple European and domestic contexts. Based on quantitative interview data, I demonstrate that, in contrast to the strong socialization hypothesis, extensive exposure to the European level does not necessarily lead to supranational role playing. On the contrary, domestic factors, rather than European-level conditions, positively affect the adoption of supranational role conceptions.Thanks to Ambassador Frans Van Daele and Ambassador Philippe de Shoutheete de Tervarent, who allowed interviews on aspects of this article. I also express my gratitude toward the ISPO-team of the University of Leuven, Belgium, for their help in doing the fieldwork, and to Jan De Bock and Vincent Mertens de Wilmars for the crucial information they provided. Data collection was made possible by a grant from the Fund for Scientific Research–Flanders (Belgium) and was supervised by Guido Dierickx (University of Antwerp, Belgium). Special thanks go to the participants in the various IDNET-workshops and the ARENA research seminar (April 2002), to IO editors Thomas Risse and Lisa Martin, two anonymous reviewers, and Karen Anderson, Morten Egeberg, Jeff Checkel, Alexandra Gheciu, Jeffrey Lewis, Marianne van der Steeg, Mark Rhinard, Jarle Trondal, and Maarten Vink for their extensive and constructive comments.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , October 2005 , pp. 899 - 936
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beyers, Jan, and Guido Dierickx. 1998. The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations? Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (3):289–317.Google Scholar
Beyers, Jan, and Jarle Trondal. 2004. How Nation-States ‘Hit’ Europe. Ambiguity and Representation in the European Union. West European Politics 27 (5):919–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, Simon J. 1994. The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalist Approach. Journal of Public Policy 13 (4):351–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursens, Peter. 2002. Why Denmark and Belgium Have Different Implementation Records: On Transposition Laggards and Leaders in the EU. Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (2):173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1995. Transnational Relations and the Development of European and Monetary Union. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, edited by Thomas Risse-Kappen, 37–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Checkel, Jeffrey. 1999. Social Construction and Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4):545–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2004. Social Constructivism in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay. Review of International Studies 30 (2):229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Thomas. 2002. The Role of Supranational Actors in EU Treaty Reform. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (1):33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Maria Green, James Caporaso, and Thomas Risse. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Crombez, Christophe. 1996. Legislative Procedures in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science 26 (2):199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierickx, Guido, and Jan Beyers. 1999. Belgian Civil Servants in the European Union. A Tale of Two Cultures? West European Politics 22 (3):198–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 1999. Transcending Intergovernmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (3):456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 2004. An Organizational Approach to European Integration: Outline of a Complementary Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 43 (2):199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgström, Ole, Bo Bjurulf, Jonas Johansson, and Anders Sannerstedt. 2001. Coalitions in European Union Negotiations. Scandinavian Political Studies 24 (2):111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and George Tsebelis. 1996. An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50 (2):269–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus. 2000. European Integration and National Executives: A Cause in Search of an Effect? West European Politics 23 (4):210–31.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economical Forces 1950–1957. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1):1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmsen, Robert. 1999. The Europeanization of National Administrations: A Comparative Study of France and the Netherlands. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 12 (1):81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, and Helen Wallace. 1997. The Council of Ministers. London: MacMillan.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1966. Ostinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95:862–915.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1982. Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today. Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (1–2):21–38.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999. Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents?: Explaining the Orientations of Senior Commission Officials Toward European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 32 (4):435–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1969. Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization 23 (4):859–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Henry H. 1973. Changing Attitudes Through International Participation: European Parliamentarians and Integration. International Organization 27 (1):45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Bart. 1996. Do Institutions Make a Difference? Non-Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision-Making in the European Union. Governance 9 (2):217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Bart, and Jan Beyers. 2001. The Belgian Permanent Representation to the European Union: Mail Box, Messenger, or Representative? In The National Co-ordination of EU Policy, edited by Hussein Kassim, Anand Menond, B. Guy Peters, and Vincent Wright, 1991–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kim, Jae-On and Charles W. Mueller. 1978. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. London: Sage.
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. Is the ‘Hard Bargaining’ Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2003. Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision Making: Rationalist or Constructivist? Comparative Political Studies 36 (1/2):97–124.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon N. 1963. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. London: Oxford University Press.
Lindberg, Leon N. 1998 [1963]. Political Integration: Definitions and Hypotheses. In The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, edited by Brent Nelsen and Alexander Stubb, 145–56. London: Macmillan.
Mair, Peter. 2004. The Europeanization Dimension. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (2):337–48.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. Forthcoming. The Logic of Appropriateness. In Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Robert Goodin, Michael Moran, and Martin Rein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, Lisa, and Beth A. Simmons. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, Mikko, and Jan-Erik Lane. 2001. Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting. European Union Politics 2 (1):31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 1999. Organizations, Agents and Representatives. In Organizing Political Institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen, edited by Morten Egeberg and Per Laegreid, 81–91. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4):473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht. London: UCL Press.
Peck, Richard. 1979. Socialization of Permanent Representatives in the United Nations: Some Evidence. International Organization 33 (3):365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pollack, Mark A. 1998. Constructivism, Social Psychology and Elite Attitude Change: Lessons from an Exhausted Research Program. Paper Presented at the 11th International Conference of Europeanists, February, Baltimore.
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheinman, Lawrence, and Werner Feld. 1972. The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States. International Organization 26 (1):121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1969. The Comparative Study of Elite Socialization. Comparative Political Studies 1 (4):471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1986. A Theory of Political Socialization: Institutional Support and Deradicalization in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 16 (3):341–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1991. Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism. American Political Science Review 85 (4):1239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Keith A. 1973. The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States—A Comment. International Organization 27 (4):563–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Jacqueline M. 1997. The European Union ‘A View from the Top’: Top Decision Makers and the European Union. Prepared for EOS Gallup Europe's European Omnibus Survey. Brussels: EOS Gallup Europe. Available at 〈http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/top/top_en.htm〉. Accessed 21 June 2005.
Steunenberg, Bernard. 2000. Seeing What You Want to See: the Limits of Current Modelling on the European Union. European Union Politics 1 (3):368–73.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Wayne Sandholtz. 1997. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (3):297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Perspective. Reading, Mass.: Benjamin-Cummings.
Tacq, Jacques. 1997. Multivariate Analysis Techniques in Social Science Research: From Problem to Analysis. London: Sage.
Trondal, Jarle. 2001. Is There Any Social Constructivist-Institutionalist Divide? Unpacking Social Mechanisms Affecting Representational Roles among EU Decision-Makers. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (1):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, Maarten. 2003. What Is Europeanisation? And Other Questions on a New Research Agenda. European Political Science 3 (1):63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang. 1991. The EC Council: The Community's Decisionmaking Center. In The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, edited by Stanley Hoffmann and Robert O. Keohane, 133–54. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
Westlake, Martin. 1995. The Council of the European Union. London: Catermill.
Wolf, Peter. 1973. International Organization and Attitude Change: A Re-Examination of the Functionalist Approach. International Organization 27 (3):347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar