Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T09:29:31.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arab League

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

On July 30, 1962, the government of Syria presented a formal complaint against alleged United Arab Republic interference in its internal affairs to Abdul Khaliq Hassouna, Secretary-General of the Arab League. The Secretary-General at Syria's request said he would start preparations for holding an extraordinary meeting of the League's Council to discuss the complaint, but it would take at least five days.

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities: III. Political and Regional Organizations
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 287 note 1 The Times (London), 07 31, 1962Google ScholarPubMed. For a summary of previous activities of the League, Arab, see International Organization, Summer 1962 (Vol. 16, No. 3), pp. 635636Google Scholar.

page 287 note 2 The Times (London), 08 17, 1962Google Scholar. The admission of Algeria increased the membership of the League to thirteen. The other twelve members of the League were Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, the Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen, and the United Arab Republic.

page 287 note 3 See International Organization, Summer 1962 (Vol. 16, No. 3), p. 635CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

page 287 note 4 The Times (London), 08 27, August 29, August 31, and September 1, 1962Google Scholar. The New York Times, August 29 and September 1, 1962.

page 288 note 5 The Times (London), 09 7, 1962Google ScholarPubMed.

page 288 note 6 The Times (London), 09 11, 1962Google ScholarPubMed.

page 288 note 7 The Times (London), 09 17, 1962Google ScholarPubMed.

page 288 note 8 The Times (London), 09 19, 1962Google ScholarPubMed.