Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:11:10.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rodríguez Castañeda v. Mexico

United Nations Human Rights Committee.  18 July 2013 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Admissibility of author’s communication to Human Rights Committee — Consideration of merits — States Parties to ensure Covenant rights are extended to all persons within their territories without distinction — State to take measures to bring domestic legislation into line with Covenant — Right to freedom of expression and freedom to seek information — Reconciling differences between different language versions of the authentic texts — Right to equality before the law and entitlement to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal — Right to vote by secret ballot — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Articles 2, 14, 19 and 25

Treaties — Interpretation — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Optional Protocol to Covenant — Spanish version of Article 5(2)(a) of Optional Protocol — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Article 33(4) — Meaning best reconciling authentic texts having regard to object and purpose of treaty — Whether examination of author’s claim by Inter-American Commission on Human Rights precluding consideration of communication — Admissibility of author’s claim — United Nations Human Rights Committee

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)