Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2011
Beginning in the mid-1930s, Western Hemisphere nations turned to social insurance legislation—guided by the new concept of social security—in response to the economic crisis of the Great Depression. Supported by the International Labor Organization (ILO), national-level policy makers introduced a range of measures in recognition of the 1935 US Social Security Act. As Europe descended into a war, inter-Americanism served as way to maintain regional economic, and later military, security. This article describes an era of social welfare diplomacy in the Americas, one in which countries south of the US border projected their own distinct visions of social policy. Regional solidarity served as an integral step in the development of ideas concerning international social and economic rights. Placing President Franklin Roosevelt's Good Neighbor Policy in a wider frame, this analysis of ILO inter-American activities reveals an intriguing moment in history, when leaders from several nations saw economic development, trade, future growth, social security, and labor rights as integrally bound together.
1. Roosevelt, Franklin, “A Message to the Congress on Social Security, January 17, 1935,” in The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Vol. 4 (New York, 1938)Google Scholar, 43.
2. As will become apparent, international declarations became increasingly common during the Second World War. The United Nations later defined these as “formal and solemn instruments suitable . . . when principles of great and lasting significance are being enunciated.” See “Memorandum of the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs,” E/CN.4/L.610 (1962).
3. Borgwardt, Elizabeth, A New Deal for the World: America's Vision for Human Rights (Cambridge, 2005), 47–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gilman, Nils, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America (Baltimore, 2007), 19–20Google Scholar.
4. “Comment by Mr. Fernández R., Workers' Delegate from Cuba,” in Provisional Record, 26th International Labor Conference, Philadelphia, 1944, Eighth Sitting, 103.
5. As described by Leifur Magnusson, director of the ILO's Washington, DC Office, in “A New Deal for the World's Workers,” The Rotarian (September 1933), 34–36Google Scholar. See also Reynaud, Emmanuel, “Social Security for All: Trends and Challenges,” Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal 27 (Winter 2006): 123–50Google Scholar.
6. Patel, Kiran Klaus, Soldiers of Labor: Labor Service in Nazi Germany and New Deal America, 1933–1945 (New York, 2005), 69–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 124; “Labor under Hitler,”(1935), box 25, Papers of Carter Goodrich, RBML, Columbia University, New York.
7. Oliver Liang, “Governing Globalization: Labour Economic Paradigms and International Labour Standards at the International Labour Organisation, 1919–1998,” http://www.historycooperative.org/proceedings/interactions/liang.html (accessed March 2007).
8. Endres, Anthony and Fleming, Grant A., International Organizations and the Analysis of Economic Policy, 1919–1950 (Cambridge, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 163.
9. Keynes, John Maynard, General Theory of Employment Interests and Money (London, 1936)Google Scholar, 319, as described by Endres and Fleming, Analysis, 81, 102.
10. “All-American Labor Institute Sought,” Christian Science Monitor, January 15, 1936Google Scholar, 2.
11. Frances Perkins to Harold Butler, April 25, 1932, File XR 61/1/4, ILO Archives, Geneva; Perkins, Frances, “Social Security Here and Abroad,” Foreign Affairs 13 (April 1935): 373–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12. International Labour Office, The I.L.O. Year-Book, 1936–1937 (Geneva, 1937)Google Scholar, 49; Endres and Fleming, Analysis, 119.
13. Hardman, J.B.S., ed., Rendezvous with Destiny: Addresses and Opinions of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (New York, 1944), 143–45Google Scholar.
14. Diebold, William, New Directions in our Trade Policy (New York, 1941), 24–28Google Scholar, 123–26.
15. Pike, Fredrick, FDR's Good Neighbor Policy: Sixty Years of Generally Gentle Chaos (Austin, 1995)Google Scholar; LaFeber, Walter, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America (New York, 1993), 83–85Google Scholar.
16. For a discussion of the Latin American export-led growth model, including import substitution industrialization, see Thorpe, Rosemary, Progress, Poverty and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century (Washington, 1998), 88–93Google Scholar.
17. League of Nations, World Economic Survey (Geneva, 1942)Google Scholar; Duggan, Laurence, The Americas: The Search for Hemispheric Security (New York, 1949), 143–56Google Scholar.
18. “Draft Resolution: Barriers to International Trade, November 1938,” box 61, Papers of Adolf Berle, State Department Files 1938–1945, Franklin Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, NY.
19. “ILO Director Sees Need for Planning,” General Collection, ILO Part I, MG I 103, vol. 224, Records of the Department of External Affairs, National Archives of Canada (hereafter NAC), Ottawa, Ontario.
20. Altmeyer to Winant, February 18, 1936, on the need for greater liberalization of social security, box 4, RG 47, Records of the Social Security Administration, Social Security Board, NARA II, College Park, MD; on international social welfare goals, see Altmeyer, , “Address at the Inter-American Conference on Social Security,” in Inter-American Handbook of Social Insurance Institutions (Montreal, 1945): 10–19Google Scholar.
21. Stewart, Maxwell Slutz, Building for Peace at Home and Abroad (Freeport, NY, 1943)Google Scholar, 166; Endres and Fleming, Analysis, 101–2.
22. ILO, “Public Works as a Factor in Economic Stabilisation,” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 15 (May 1939): 256–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23. Mallery, Otto T., “Action by the International Labor Organization on Public Works and Unemployment,” Social Service Review 12 (March 1938): 101–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Second Committee: Economic Development,” ECOSOC discussion, December 1, 1947, Papers of Isador Lubin, box 139, FDR Library.
24. Alfaro, Ricardo, “Toward an American Association of Nations,” World Affairs (September 1938): 158–65Google Scholar; Tomlinson, Edward, “Economic Highways of the Americas,” The Rotarian (May 1942): 10–13Google Scholar.
25. Other CES members who worked with the ILO included Wilber Cohen, Grace Abbott, Isador Lubin, Marion Folsom, Josephine Roche, and AFL president William Green.
26. For the definition of the term labor feminists, see Cobble, Dorothy Sue, The Other Women's Movement: Workplace Justice and Social Rights in Modern America (Princeton, 2004), 4–8Google Scholar.
27. “First Convention of International Conference of Working Women, National Museum, Washington, DC, October 28–November 6, 1919,” box 1, International Federation of Working Women Papers (courtesy of the WTUL), Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University (hereafter SL).
28. Salmond, John, The General Textile Strike of 1934: From Maine to Alabama (Columbia, MO, 2002)Google Scholar.
29. Winant, John, “The New Hampshire Plan,” Review of Reviews 86 (November 1932)Google Scholar: 24.
30. Lorwin, Lewis, The World Textile Conference (New York, 1937), 37–39Google Scholar.
31. Roosevelt to Winant, August 22, 1936, box 2, Papers of Arthur J. Altmeyer, Wisconsin Historical Society (hereafter WHS); “RE: Amendment to the Social Security Act,” Altmeyer to Winant, February 18, 1936, box 4, RG 47, NARA II; Carol Riegelman to Winant, February 25, 1936, box 170, Papers of John G. Winant, FDR Library.
32. “Winant's Usefulness in Geneva,” 1938 report by Carter Goodrich, box 6, folder 877, Frances Perkins Papers, Women's Rights Collection, SL (hereafter Perkins, WRC, SL).
33. Haas, Ernst, Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Organization (Stanford, CA, 1964)Google Scholar, 151.
34. Alcock, Anthony, The International Labour Organisation (London, 1971)Google Scholar, 134; Bender, Thomas, A Nation Among Nations: America's Place in World History (New York, 2006)Google Scholar, 284.
35. For details on the 1931 Labor Code, see Vergara, Angela, Copper Workers, International Business, and Domestic Politics in Cold War Chile (University Park, PA, 2008), 57–58Google Scholar.
36. Berríos, Alfredo Gaete, Tratado Drecho del Trabajo de Drecho del Trabajo y Seguridad Social, Tomo 1 (Santiago, 1966)Google Scholar, 78.
37. In the 1930s the League of Nations, and the ILO itself, became a forum for women's political activist groups to lobby for equal rights. Latin American women specifically raised issues relating to civil and political equality for women, including nationality rights.
38. Miller, Francesca, Latin American Women and the Search for Social Justice (Hanover, 1991)Google Scholar, 94; Whitney, Robert, State and Revolution in Cuba: Mass Mobilization and Political Change, 1920–1940 (Chapel Hill, NC, 2001)Google Scholar, 149.
39. ILO, The International Labour Organization and Social Insurance (Geneva, 1936)Google Scholar, 128.
40. Shorris, Earl, The Life and Times of Mexico (New York, 2004)Google Scholar, 279; Vázquez, Josefina Zoraida and Meyer, Lorenzo, The United States and Mexico (Chicago, 1985), 146–52Google Scholar.
41. Dion, Michelle, “The Political Origins of Social Security in Mexico During the Cárdenas and Ávila Camacho Administrations,” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 21 (Winter 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 8, 26.
42. A set of decrees and laws, the Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (CLT), was finally approved in May 1943. See Bethell, Leslie, “Brazil,” in Latin America Between the Second World War and the Cold War, eds. Bethell, Leslie and Roxborough, Ian (New York, 1992)Google Scholar, 41.
43. French, John, “The Populist Gamble of Getúlio Vargas: Political and Ideological Transitions in Brazil,” in Latin America in the 1940s: War and Postwar Transitions, ed. Rock, David (Berkeley, 1994)Google Scholar, 145.
44. Herring, Herbert, Good Neighbors: Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Seventeen Other Countries (New Haven, CT, 1941)Google Scholar, 4.
45. Massey, Vincent, “Canada and the Inter-American System,” Foreign Affairs 26 (July 1948): 693–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46. Guest, Dennis, Social Security in Canada (Vancouver, 1997), 88–91Google Scholar; Mainwaring, John, The International Labour Organization: A Canadian View (Ottawa, 1986), 79–85Google Scholar; Pal, Leslie Alexander, State, Class, and Bureaucracy: Canadian Unemployment Insurance and Public Policy (Kingston, ON, 1988), 36–38Google Scholar.
47. Guest, Social Security in Canada, 110.
48. Leifur Magnusson to Butler, December 21, 1936, XC 61/1/2 and Butler to Perkins, [late 1936], XR 61/1/4, ILO Archives.
49. Irvine, Warren, “Labor Conference of American States, Santiago, Chile 1936,” Monthly Labor Review (March 1936)Google Scholar: 2.
50. Oswald Stein, an academic and government official, was well known as an international social insurance expert. See Rodgers, Gerry, Lee, Eddy, Swepston, Lee, and van Daele, Jasmien, The ILO and the Quest for Social Justice, 1919–2009 (Ithaca, NY, 2009)Google Scholar, 146.
51. Irvine, “Labor Conference of American States, Santiago, Chile 1936,” 3–4; “The Latin American Delegates to the International Labor Conference and the Social Problems Which Interest Particularly Latin America,” report from Frieda Miller to Winant [ND], box 170, Winant Papers, FDR Library.
52. Miller, “Report to the Secretary of Labor on the First Pan-America Conference of the International Labor Organization, Santiago, Chile, January 2–14, 1936,” p. 3, box 8, folder 170, Papers of Frieda S. Miller, SL.
53. For example, ILO, “Discussion on Minimum Wage Regulation in the Countries of America, Second Conference, Havana, Cuba,” (Geneva, 1939); Mendez, Jorge, “Minimum Wages in Latin America,” International Labor Review 42 (1950): 117Google Scholar.
54. Miller, “Report to the Secretary of Labor,” 7.
55. “Women and the International Labor Organization, 1946,” report submitted by Ethel McLean Johnson, box 12, RG 86, Department of Labor Women's Bureau, International Division, General Records, NARA II.
56. As quoted in “Labor Parley Rift Over Americanism,” New York Times, Jan. 5, 1936, p. 38
57. Carol Riegelman to Winant, February 25, 1936, box 170, Winant Papers, FDR Library.
58. Andrew Barnard, “Chile,” in Latin America Between, eds. Bethell and Roxborough, 71.
59. Alcock, 137.
60. For a survey of events in Geneva at the time, and his explanation of US policies, see Goodrich, Carter in Problems of Peace: Geneva and the Drift to War (London, 1938), 116–30Google Scholar.
61. Not one ILO member country ratified the reduction of hours in public works convention (1935) and only three nations did so for each the regulation of hours of work in coal mines (1935) and at sea (1936). Only New Zealand ratified the general forty-hour week convention (1935) before 1956. See ILOLEX: http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/convdisp1.htm (accessed March 20, 2010).
62. FDR, “Message to Congress on the National Health Program, January 23, 1939,” John T. Woolley and Gerhard Peters, The American Presidency Project [online]. Santa Barbara, CA.
63. DeWitt, Larry, “Financing Social Security, 1939–1949: A Reexamination of the Financing Policies of this Period,” Social Security Bulletin 67 (2007): 51–69Google ScholarPubMed.
64. Alfaro, Ricardo, “The Future of Inter-American Relations,” Annals AAPSS 204 (July 1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 145.
65. Adopted by inter-American diplomats, this declaration included statements on women's rights and freedom of association for workers. Glendon, Mary Ann, “The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Human Rights Idea,” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16 (2003)Google Scholar: 28.
66. Szok, Peter, La última gaviota: Liberalism and Nostalgia in early Twentieth-century Panamá (Westport, CT, 2001), 111–12Google Scholar.
67. Provisional Record, Second International Labor Conference of American State Members of the International Labor Organization, First Sitting. November 21, 1939, box 119, Francis J. Haas Papers, Catholic University of America (hereafter CUA), Washington, DC.
68. Resolution Concerning Economic and Financial Co-operation between the Nations of the American Continent, Adopted on November 30, 1939, ILO, Official Bulletin (April 1, 1944), 23.
69. Lombardo Toledano called for comprehensive social security programs throughout Latin America as leader of the Confederación de Trabajadores de América Latina (CTAL). Toledano, Vicente Lombardo, The CTAL: The War and the Postwar (Mexico, D.F., 1945), 115–120Google Scholar
70. Personal Diary, box 118, Haas Papers, CUA.
71. International Labour Conference, Records of the Proceedings, Second Labour Conference of the American States, Havana, 1939 (Montreal, 1941), 54–55Google Scholar.
72. In 1942, in support of such reforms, Lombardo noted, “[W]e defend something more important than the past—we defend the future.” Vicente Lomardo Toledano, The United States and Mexico: Two Nations, One Ideal, pamphlet by the Council for Pan America Democracy (New York, 1942), 20.
73. “Remarks of Mary Winslow to N.W.T.U.L.: Report of Havana ILO Conference, December 14, 1939,” box 1, Papers of Mary Winslow, SL.
74. League of Nations, “Status of Women: [1935] Proposal of Certain Delegations for Examination by the Assembly . . . with Particular Reference to the Treaty Signed in Montevideo,” box 7, Papers of Alma Lutz, SL. For a description of the battles between US equal rights feminists and ILO advocates, see Paula F. Pfeffer, “‘A Whisper in the Assembly of Nations’: United States' Participation in the International Movement for Women's Rights from the League of Nations to the United Nations,” Women's Studies International Forum 8 (1985): 459–71.
75. “ILO Special Report of Director,” (Montreal, 1941) and “Director's Response: Havana Conference, 1939,” box 1, Winant ILO Collection, FDR Library.
76. Years later Fidel Castro drafted two of his own Havana Declarations. They called for a renewed charter of economic and social rights in the region. Quirk, Robert, Fidel Castro (New York, 1995)Google Scholar, 332.
77. ILO, Record of the Proceedings, Havana, 1939, vi; International Labour Office, Future Policy, Programme and Status of the International Labour Organization (Montreal, 1944)Google Scholar, 4. For contributions during the drafting of the UDHR, including suggestions made by ILO expert Rudolf Aladár Métall, see Morsink, Johannes, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent (Philadelphia, 2002)Google Scholar, 196, 202–3.
78. International Labor Conference, Records of the Proceedings (Geneva, 1939)Google Scholar, 231.
79. “Radio Transfer, August 17, 1940,” Perkins to Winant, box 6, folder 880, Perkins, WRC, SL; Riegelman, Carol, “Labor's Bridgehead: The ILO,” Political Science Quarterly 60 (June 1945): 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
80. Goodrich did so through contact with Isador Lubin, serving as international economic adviser to President Roosevelt. The men sent daily dispatches back and forth, detailing the exchange of information between the ILO and the US planners, such as those working on the National Resources Planning Board (NRPB). Lubin in turn met with FDR and consistently urged presidential support for the ILO. See boxes 25 and 26, Goodrich Papers, Columbia University, and box 49, Papers of Isador Lubin, FDR Library.
81. Goodrich to Lubin, October 17, 1939, and May 11, 1940, box 54, Lubin Papers, FDR Library.
82. “Franklin Roosevelt's Annual Address to Congress, January 6, 1941,” FDR Library Digital Archives, http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/od4frees.html (accessed December 12, 2009).
83. Reynolds, David, “Roosevelt, the British Left, and the Appointment of John G. Winant as United States Ambassador to Britain in 1941,” The International History Review, 4 (August 1982): 393–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
84. “Address by Winant at a Miner's Union Hall, Durham” in Toward New Horizons: The World Beyond the War (Washington, 1942), 10–11Google Scholar.
85. “Roosevelt New Deal Sends Ambassador to Britain's New Dealers,” Life 10 (March 3, 1941): 23–27Google Scholar.
86. Aaronson, Susan, “How Cordell Hull and Postwar Planners Designed a New Trade Policy,” Business and Economic History 20 (1991): 176Google Scholar; Hoopes, Townsend and Brinkley, Douglas, FDR and the Creation of the UN (New Haven, 1997)Google Scholar, 111.
87. Altmeyer, Arthur, The Formative Years of Social Security: A Chronicle of Social Security Legislation and Administration, 1934–1954 (Madison, WI, 1968)Google Scholar, 28.
88. Phelan to Madam [Secretary Perkins], November 12, 1942, box 25, Goodrich Papers; Phelan's draft for “A Social Mandate for the I.L.O.,” box 80, Papers of Samuel M. Lindsay, RBML, Columbia University.
89. “Conference of the International Labor Organization, Held at the East Room of the White House, November 6, 1941 . . .,” FDR Library Digital Archives (accessed December 12, 2009).
90. Bethell and Roxborough, Latin America Between, 7. See also Kimball, Warren F., The Most Unsordid Act: Lend-Lease, 1939–1941 (Baltimore, 1969)Google Scholar.
91. Cruz, Miguel García, La seguridad social en Mexico, Vol. 1, 1906–1958 (Mexico, 1972–73)Google Scholar, 114, quoted in Spalding, Rose, “Welfare Policymaking: Theoretical Implications of a Mexican Case Study,” Comparative Politics 12 (July 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 425.
92. Oswald Stein, “Technical Collaboration with South American Countries: A Plan for Technical Collaboration,” box 4, Winant Papers, FDR Library.
93. Stein, Oswald, “Building Social Security,” International Labour Review (September 1941)Google Scholar: 263.
94. Beveridge offered special thanks to Stein and ILO colleagues for their council during the drafting of his report. Beveridge to Stein's assistant, Maurice Stack, March 18, 1944 Z.1/25/4/1, ILO Archives.
95. Beveridge, William, Social Insurance and Allied Services, Report by Sir William Beveridge (London, 1942)Google Scholar; Beveridge, , “Social Security: Some Trans-Atlantic Comparisons,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 106 (1943): 305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
96. For example, Altmeyer to Roosevelt, December 4, 1942, box 2, folder 2, Altmeyer Papers, WHS.
97. The US report, originally drafted in 1941, proposed a wide range of social security programs, including the extension of unemployment insurance, public employment services, affordable housing projects, and the creation of a system of federal health insurance.
98. Mesa-Lago, Carmelo, Reassembling Social Security: A Survey of Pensions and Health Care Reforms in Latin America (New York, 2008)Google Scholar, 3.
99. “Cradle to Grave to Pigeonhole,” Time Magazine (March 22, 1943)Google Scholar: 13.
100. “International Labour Office Social Security Consultation on Income Maintenance and Medical Care, Montreal,” July 9–12, 1943, SI 23–5/1, ILO Archives.
101. Claxton, Brooke, “The Place of Canada in Post-War Organization,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 10 (November 1944)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 411, 418.
102. ILO, Record of the Proceedings (Philadelphia, 1944)Google Scholar, 72.
103. Provisional Record, Philadelphia, Eighth sitting, p. 100, box 119, Haas Papers, CUA.
104. “Proposed Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organisation,” in Future Policy, Program, and Status of the International Labour Organisation (Montreal, 1944), 185–86Google Scholar.
105. Berle to Perkins, April 18, 1944, box 13, Perkins, WRC, SL.
106. “Report on the Subcommittee on Economic Questions,” p. 4–6, box 119, Haas Papers, CUA.
107. Gilderhus, Mark, Second Century: U.S.-Latin American Relations Since 1889 (Wilmington, 2000)Google Scholar, 118.
108. Final Act (Pan American Union), p.19 quoted by Fenwick, Charles G., “Pan-American Action for Protection of Human Rights,” Annals AAPSS 243 (Jan., 1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 141.
109. Waltz, Susan, “Universalizing Human Rights: The Role of Small States in the Construction of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly 23 (February 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 61.
110. Altmeyer to Lubin, April 16, 1945, box 10, Lubin Papers, FDR Library.
111. Winant to Perkins, January 28, 1945, box 7, folder 883, Perkins, WRC, SL.
112. See International Labour Office, “Postwar Trends in Social Security” series appearing in the International Labour Review (June–September 1949)Google Scholar.
113. Morsink, Origins, 131–33.
114. “Meeting of the Committee on International Social Policy, May 27, 1948,” box 98, RG 353, State Department, Records of Interdepartmental and Intradepartmental Committees, NARA II.
115. Massey, Vincent, “Canada and the Inter-American System,” Foreign Affairs 26 (July 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 693.
116. Kunz, Josef, “The Bogota Charter of the Organization of American States,” The American Journal of International Law 42 (July 1948): 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar; C. G. Fenwick, “The Charter of the Organization of American States Enters Into Force,” 46 (April 1952), 317.
117. “ILO Conference to Consider Industrial Relations Charter,” March 25, 1946, MG 28, I 103, vol 224, NAC.
118. International Social Security Association Bulletin, no. 1, April, 1948, MG 28, I 103, vol 358, NAC.
119. Nils Gilman, Mandarins of the Future; Rossinow, Douglas C., Visions of Progress: The Left Liberal Tradition in America (Philadelphia, 2008)Google Scholar. On the influences of a new generation of social sciences in the postwar period, see Cravens's, Hamilton introduction in The Social Sciences go to Washington: The Politics of Knowledge in the Postmodern Age, Cravens, Hamilton, ed. (New Brunswick, NJ, 2004): 1–8Google Scholar.
120. “Committee on International Social Policy: Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Status of Women,” May 22, 1947, box 8, folder 184, Miller Papers, SL.
121. Efrón, David, “Latin American Labor Comes of Age,” Annals AAPSS 240 (July 1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 117.