No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The biology and behaviour of Cicadulina triangula in relation to maize streak virus resistance screening
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2011
Abstract
The success in streak virus resistance breeding at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) has depended mostly on developing suitable techniques for mass rearing Cicadulina triangula as a vector. Since 1977, IITA scientists have continuously improved maize streak virus (MSV) screening techniques. Recent innovations in mass rearing Cicadulina have made it possible to infest experimental maize fields at IITA with as many as 180,000–200,000 viruliferous leafhoppers each week. The 10–14 day old maize seedlings have been replaced with millet plants for oviposition and rearing of nymphs. The effect of temperature on the biology of C. triangula was studied under growth-chamber and screen house conditions. Monitoring to find out the percentage of active virus transmitters in the research population helps to indicate the number of viruliferous leafhoppers which should be released per experimental plant to secure 90–95% efficiency of MSV infections. Three-leaf stage plants produce clear streak virus symptoms after 5–7 days. Older plants require a higher number of Cicadulina adults to produce symptoms.
Résumé
Le développement de techniques appropriées quant à l'élevage de masse du vecteur Cicadulina triangula a joué un rôle crucial dans la réussite du programme de sélection mené à l'IITA et portant sur la résistance au virus de la striure. Depuis 1977, les méthodes de criblage visant à améliorer cette résistance ont été constamment perfectionnées. Les dernières innovations touchant à l'élevage de masse de Cicadulina ont permis une infestation hebdomadaire des parcelles expérimentales de l'Institut avec des jassides virulents de l'ordre de 180.000–200.000. Dans le domaine de l'oviposition et de l'élevage des nymphes, les plants de mil ont été substitués aux plantules de maïs de 10–14 jours. Par ailleurs, l'influence de la température sur la biologie de C. triangula a fait l'objet d'une étude en conditions de chambre de croissance et de Serre. Un contrôle soigné visant à évaluer le pourcentage de transmetteurs actifs au sein de la population expérimentale peut s'avérer très utile. En effet, cette opération facilite la détermination du nombre de jassides virulents qu'il faudra déposer sur chaque plant pour obtenir un degré d'infection de 90–95% par le virus de la striure. Les symptômes de la maladie sont clairement discernables sur les plants ayant atteint le stade à trois feuilles, et ceci 5–7 jours après l'infestation. Les pieds plus âgés, quant à eux, nécessitent un nombre supérieur de Cicadulina adultes avant que n'apparaissent les symptômes.
Keywords
- Type
- Section V: screening techniques and methodologies for host plant resistance research
- Information
- International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 6 , Special Issue 3: Host Plant Resistance and its Significance in Pest Management , June 1985 , pp. 417 - 424
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICIPE 1985
References
REFERENCES
Alam, M. S. (1983) Mass production of leafhoppers. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Annual Report for 1982, pp. 31–32. Ibadan Nigeria.Google Scholar
Bjarnason, M. (1983) Conversion of experimental varieties to streak resistance. IITA Annual Report for 1982, p. 23. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Efron, Y., Kim, S. K., Singh, J. and Bjarnason, M. (1981) IITA's Maize Improvement Program. Presented at 1st Joint Planning Meeting for the CEC Funded NYV-Technology Project, IITA, Ibadan, Niberia. 5–9 October, 1981.Google Scholar
Fajemisin, J. M. (1983a) TZSR-W-1 and TZSR-Y-1. IITA Annual Report for 1982, pp. 19–20. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Fajemisin, J. M. (1983b) Downy mildew and streak resistance. IITA Annual Report for 1982, pp. 22–23. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Fajemisin, J. M., Cook, G. E., Okusanya, F. and Shoyinka, S. A. (1976) Maize streak epiphytotic in Nigeria. Pl. Dis. Rep. 60, 443–447.Google Scholar
Fajemisin, J. M., Kim, S. K., Efron, Y. and Alam, M. S. (1982) Breeding for durable resistance in tropical maize with special reference to maize streak virus. FAO/IITA Expert Consultation on Durable Resistance Breeding, 25–29 October, 1982, p. 30. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Fajemisin, J. M., Bjarnason, M., Kim, S. K., Efron, Y. and Dabrowski, Z. T. (1984) Effect of maize streak virus on maize productivity. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of Nigeria Society of Plant Protection, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, 12–15 March 1984.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1975a) Survey of disease and insect damage. Annual Report for 1975, pp. 163–164. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1975b) Maize streak virus. Annual Report for 1975, pp. 156–157. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1976) Resistance to maize streak virus. Annual Report for 1976, pp. 8–9. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1977) Development of populations resistant to maize streak virus. Annual Report for 1977, p. 4. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1980) Maize streak virus. Annual Report for 1979, pp. 107–108. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1981) Genetic improvement. MSV resistance breeding. Annual Report for 1980, pp. 86–90. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Khadr, F. H., Kim, S. K. and Fajemisin, J. M. (1983) TZMSR. IITA Annual Report for 1982, p. 21. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Kim, S. K., Singh, J., Fajemisin, J. M. and Bjarnason, M. (1982) Development of two early maturing streak resistant maize populations for Africa. IITA Res. Briefs 3, 5–6.Google Scholar
Kim, S. K., Efron, Y., Khadr, F. H. and Fajemisin, J. M. (1983) Hybrid project. ITTA Annual Report for 1982, pp. 23–27. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Nielson, M. W. (1968) The leafhopper vectors of phyto-pathogenic viruses. Taxonomy, biology and virus transmission. U.S. Dept Agric. Tech. Bull. Vol. 1382.Google Scholar
Pham, H. N. (1983) Early maturing, streak resistant germplasm. IITA Annual Report for 1982, pp. 21–22. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Rose, D. J. W. (1972) Dispersal and quality in populations of Cicadulina species. J. Anim. Ecol. 41, 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. J. W. (1973) Field studies in Rhodesia on Cicadulina spp. vectors of maize streak disease. Bull. ent. Res. 62, 477–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppel, R. F. (1965) A review of the genus Cicadulina (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Michigan St. Univ. Museum Biol. Ser. 2, 385–428.Google Scholar
Soto, P. E., Buddenhagen, I. W. and Asnani, V. L. (1982) Development of streak virus resistant maize populations through improved challenge and selection methods. Ann. appl. Biol. 100, 539–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, H. H. (1936) Report of the plant pathologist. Virus diseases of plants East African Agric. Res. Sta., Amani, Annual Report Vol. 8, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
Storey, H. H. (1938) Investigations of the mechanism of the transmission of plant viruses by insect vectors part II. The part played by puncture in transmission. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 125, 455–477.Google Scholar
Thottappilly, G., Zagre Mbi, B. and Rössel, H. W. (1985) Relationship between maize streak virus and leafhopper vector Cicadulina triangula. To be published.Google Scholar
Van Rensburg, G. D. J. (1981) Effect of plant age at the time of infection with maize streak virus on yield of maize. Phytophylactica 13, 197–198.Google Scholar
Van Rensburg, G. D. J. (1982a) Laboratory observations on the biology of Cicadulina mbila (Naude) (Homoptera:Cicadellidae), a vector of maize streak disease. (1) Effect of temperature. Phytophylactica 14, 99–107.Google Scholar
Van Rensburg, G. D. J. (1982b) (2) Effect of selected host plants. Phytophylactica 14, 109–111.Google Scholar