Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:14:52.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Data Registries to Evaluate Medical Procedures: Coronary Artery Surgery Study and the Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Kathryn Davis
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Abstract

Large registries have been used by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to evaluate a number of medical procedures. Two of these, the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and the Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry (BVR), are described to illustrate potential problems in using registry data to compare medical procedures.

Type
Special Section: Measuring Health Care Effectiveness: Use of Large Data Bases for Technology and Quality Assessments
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chaitman, B. R., Fisher, L. D., Bourassa, M. G. et al. , Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary disease. Report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS). American Journal of Cardiology, 1981, 8, 765–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Chaitman, B. R., Davis, K., Fisher, L. D. et al. , A life table and Cox regression analysis of patients with non-left main equivalent lesions (CASS). Circulation, 1983, 68, 1163–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Davis, K. B., Fisher, L., Gillespie, M. J., & Pettinger, M.A test of the National Death Index using the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1985, 6, 199–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Principal investigators of CASS and their associates. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Killup, T. (ed.), L. D. Fisher & M. B. Mock (assoc. eds.). Circulation, 1981, 63 (Suppl.), I-1–81.Google Scholar