Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:56:14.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Information Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

James G. Anderson
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Carolyn E. Aydin
Affiliation:
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Research Institute

Abstract

Evaluating the impact of computer-based medical information systems requires not only an understanding of computer technology but also an understanding of complex social and behavioral processes. This essay discusses the need for evaluation of health care information systems, a set of evaluation questions based on assumptions about the impact of technology on organizations, and recommendations for reducing barriers to the implementation of health care information systems.

Type
General Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Alderfer, C. P., & Smith, K. K.Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 3565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Anderson, J. G. Medical information systems. In Kent, A. & Williams, J. G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of microcomputers, vol. 9. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1992, 3965.Google Scholar
3.Anderson, J. G.Computerized medical record systems in ambulatory care. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 1992, 15, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Anderson, J. G., & Aydin, C. E. Overview: Theoretical perspectives and methodologies for the evaluation of health care information systems. In Anderson, J. G., Aydin, C. E., & Jay, S. J. (eds.), Evaluating health care information systems: Methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 1994, 529.Google Scholar
5.Anderson, J. G., Aydin, C. E., & Kaplan, B. An analytical framework for measuring the effectiveness/impacts of computer-based patient record systems. In Nunamaker, J. F. Jr., & Sprague, R. H. Jr., (eds.), Information systems: Collaboration systems and technology organizational systems and technology. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer So ciety Press, 1995, 767–76.Google Scholar
6.Anderson, J. G., & Jay, S. J.Computers and clinical judgment: The role of physician networks. Social Science and Medicine, 1985, 10, 969–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Anderson, J. G., Jay, S. J., Clevenger, S. J., et al. Physician utilization of a hosptial information system: A computer simulation model. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, 1988, 858–61.Google Scholar
8.Anderson, J. G., Jay, S. J., Schweer, H. M., & Anderson, M. M.Physician utilization of computers in medical practice: Policy implications based on a structural model. Social Science and Medicine, 1986, 23, 259–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Anderson, J. G., Jay, S. J., Schweer, H. M., & Anderson, M. M.Why doctors don't use computers: Some empirical findings. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1986, 79, 142–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Anderson, J. G., Jay, S. J., Schweer, H. M., et al. Physician communication networks and the adoption and utilization of computer applications in medicine. In Anderson, J. G. & Jay, S. J. (eds.), Use and impact of computers in clinical medicine. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987, 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Attewell, P., & Rule, J. B.Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Communications of the ACM, 1984, 27, 1184–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Aydin, C. E. Computerized order entry in a large medical center: Evaluating interactions between departments. In Anderson, J. G., Aydin, C. E., & Jay, S. J. (eds.), Evaluating health care information systems: Approaches and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994, 260–75.Google Scholar
13.Aydin, C. E.Occupational adaptation to computerized medical information systems. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1989, 30, 163–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Aydin, C. E., & Ischar, R. Predicting effective use of hospital computer systems: An evaluation. In Anderson, J. G., Aydin, C. E., & Jay, S. J. (eds.), Evaluating health care information systems: Approaches and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994, 245–59.Google Scholar
15.Aydin, C. E., & Rice, R. E.Bringing social worlds together: Computers as catalysts for noninteractions in health care organizations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1992, 33, 168–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Aydin, C. E., & Rice, R. E.Social world, individual differences, and implementation: Predicting attitudes toward a medical informations system. Information & Management, 1991, 20, 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Barley, S. R.Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 78108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Counte, M. A., Kjerulff, K. H., Salloway, J. C., & Campbell, B.Implementing computerization in hospitals: A case study of the behavioral and attitudinal impacts of a medical information system. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1984, 6, 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dick, R. S., & Steen, E. B. (eds.), The computer-based patient record. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.Google Scholar
20.Dowling, A. F.Outside looking in: A consultant's observations on systems integration and the major impacts of medical information technology on today's organizations. Paper presented at the IMIA Working Conference on the Organizational Impact of Informatics, Cincinnati, OH, 03 28–31, 1993.Google Scholar
21.Fischer, P. J., Stratmann, W. L., Lundsgaarde, H. P., & Steele, D. J. User reaction to PROMIS: Issues related to acceptability of medical innovations. In Anderson, J. G. & Jay, S. J. (eds.), Use and impact of computers in clinical medicine. New York: Springer-verlag, 1987, 284301.Google Scholar
22.Fischer, T.The Kaiser-Permanente information systems implementation story. Paper presented at the IMIA Working Conference on the Organizational Impact of Informatics, Cincinnati, OH, 03 28–31, 1993.Google Scholar
23.Flagle, C., Gremy, F., & Perry, S. (eds.), Assessment of medical informatics technology: Joint working conference. Editions ENSP 35043, Renes Cedex, 1991.Google Scholar
24.Forsyth, D. E., & Buchanan, B. G. Broadening our approach to evaluating medical information systems. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, 1992, 812.Google Scholar
25.Hewlett-packard, . Health professionals speak out on information technology. Advances for Medicine, 1993, 12, 1115.Google Scholar
26.Ives, B., Hamilton, S., & Favis, G. B.A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 1980, 26, 910–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.King, J. L., & Kraemer, K.Cost as a social impact of telecommunications and other information technologies. Irvine, CA: Public Policy Research Organization. 1980.Google Scholar
28.Kling, R.Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 1980, 12, 61110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Kling, R., & Scacchi, W. The web computing: Computer technology as social organization. In Yovits, M. C. (ed.), Advances in computers. New York: Academic Press, 1982, 29.Google Scholar
30.Kraemer, K. L., & Danziger, J. N.The impacts of computer technology on the worklife of information workers. Social Science Computer Review, 1980, 8, 592613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Kraemer, K. L., & Dutton, W. H. Survey research in the study of management Information systems. In Kraemer, K. L. (ed.), The information systems research challenge: Survey research methods, vol. 3. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1991, 357.Google Scholar
32.Lundsgaarde, H. P., Fischer, P. J., & Steele, D. J.Human problems in computerized medicine. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology, no. 13, 1981.Google Scholar
33.Lundsgaarde, H. P., Gardner, R. M., & Menlove, R. L.Using attitudinal questionnaires to achieve benefits optimization. Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. 1989, 13, 703–08.Google Scholar
34.Markus, M. L.Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 1983, 26, 430–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Moore, L. A. Reaction of medical personnel to a medical expert system for stroke. In Anderson, J. G., Aydin, C. E., & Jay, S. J. (eds.), Evaluating health care information systems: Methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994, 226–24.Google Scholar
36.Neal, A. S., & Simons, R. M.Playback: A method for evaluating the usability of software and its documentation. IBM Systems Journal, 1984, 23, 8296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Riflking, G. New momentum for electronic patient records. New York Times, 05 2, 1993, 8F.Google Scholar
38.Rind, D. M., Safran, C., Phillips, R. S., et al. The effect of computer-based reminders on the management of hospitalized patients. In Clayton, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Los Angeles: IEEE Computer Society, 1991, 2832.Google Scholar
39.Schoenbaum, S. C., & Barnett, G. O.Automated ambulatory medical record systems. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 598609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Strassmann, P. A.The business value of computers. Canaan, CT: The Information Economics Press, 1990.Google Scholar
41.Tierney, W. M., Miller, M. E., Overhage, J. M., & McDonald, C. J.Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1993, 269, 379–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.VanMannen, J., & Barley, S. R. Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. In Staw, B. M. (ed.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 6, Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1984, 287365.Google Scholar