Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:03:13.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Amalgam Toxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Per-Olof Glantz  and
Ivar A. Mjör
Per-Olof Glantz
Affiliation:
University of Lund
Ivar A. Mjör
Affiliation:
Scandinavian Institute of Dental Materials
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Toxicity implies an adverse effect. It may be caused by an overdose of any substance or combination of substances, either by an initial high dose or by the accumulation of a toxic substance over a long period of time. Thus, toxicity is dose dependent. It is also a relative term in that therisk involved must be evaluated and the available alternatives assessed.

Type
Special Section: Assessing the Technology of Dentistry, Part I
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , April 1990 , pp. 363 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Abraham, J. E., Svare, C. W., & Frank, C. W.The effect of dental amalgam restorations on blood mercury levels. Journal of Dental Research, 1984, 63, 71–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Axéll, T., Nilner, K., & Nilsson, B.Clinicalevaluation of patients referred with symptoms related to oral galvanism. Swedish Dental Journal, 1983, 7, 169–78.Google Scholar
3Baldi, G., Vigliani, E., & Zurlo, N.Il mercuralismocronico nei cappellifici. Medicina del Lavoro, 1953, 44, 161–98.Google Scholar
4Banoczy, F., Roed-Petersen, B., & Pindborg, J. J.Clinical and histologic studies on electrogalvanically induced oral white lesions. Oral Surgery, 1979, 48, 319–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bauer, J. G., & First, H. A.The toxicity of mercury in dental amalgams. Canadian Dental Association Journal, 1982, 10, 47–61.Google Scholar
6Birke, G., Johnels, A., Plantin, L. O. et al. , Studies on humans exposed to methyl mercury through fish consumption. Archives of Environmental Health, 1972, 25, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Blumenthal, F., & Jaffé, K.Amalgamplomben als Ursache von Quecksilberdermatitis. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenzeitschrzft, 1929, 55, 1720.Google Scholar
8Dencker, I., & Schütz, A.Kvicksilverinnehållet i kosten. Läkartidningen, 1972, 68, 4031.Google Scholar
9Duxbury, A. J., Watts, D. C., & Ead, R. D.Allergy to dental amalgam. British Dental Journal, 1982, 152, 344–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Eames, W. B., & Palmertree, C. O. Jr. Mercury emission during amalgam condensation. Operative Dentistry, 1979, 4, 15–19.Google ScholarPubMed
11Fan, P. L. Safety of amalgam. Canadian Dental Association Journal, 1987, 09, 34–36.Google Scholar
12Frykholm, K. O.Mercury from dental amalgam. Its toxic and allergic effects and some comments on occupational hygiene. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1957, 15, 1–108.Google Scholar
13Gay, D. D., Cox, R. D., & Reinhardt, J. W.Chewing releases mercury from fillings. Lancet, 1979, 8123, 985–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hugoson, A.Results obtained from patients referred for the investigation of complaints related to oral galvanism. Swedish Dental Journal, 1986, 10, 15–28.Google ScholarPubMed
15Institute der Deutschen Zahnärzte. Amalgam-pro und contra, Materialenreihe Band 1. Deutschen Ärzte-Verlag, Köln, 1988, 1–307.Google Scholar
16Johansson, B., Stenman, E., & Bergman, M.Clinical study of patients referred for investigation regarding so-called oral galvanism. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 1984, 92, 469–75.Google ScholarPubMed
17Jontell, M., Haraldsson, T., Persson, L.-O., & Öhman, S.-C.An oral and psychosocial examination of patients with presumed oral galvanism. Swedish Dental Journal, 1985, 9, 175–85.Google ScholarPubMed
18Joselow, M. M., Goldwate, L. J., Alvarez, A., & Herndon, J.Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. Archives of Environmental Health, 1986, 17, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Kallus, T.Incidence of adverse reactions from dental materials. Journal of Dental Research, 1985, 64, 758 (Abstr. No. 21).Google Scholar
20Kosta, L., Vyrne, A. R., & Zelenko, V.Correlation between selenium and mercury in man following exposure to inorganic mercury. Nature,1975, 254, 238–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Langworth, S., Elinder, C. G., Göthe, C. J. et al. , Kvicksilverhalter i blod och urin. — Inverkan av yrkesmässig exponering respektive fiskintag och amalgamfyllningar. Abstract Hygiea, 1986, 95, 122.Google Scholar
22Lind, P. O., Hurlen, B., Lyberg, T., & Aas, E.Amalgam-related oral lichenoid reaction. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research,1986, 94, 448–51.Google ScholarPubMed
23Lind, P. O.Oral lichenoid reactions to composite restorations. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1988, 46, 63–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lindqvist, O., Jernelöf, A., Johansson, K., & Rodhe, H.Mercury in the Swedish environment. Report SNV. PM 1816, 1984, National Swedish Environment Protection Board.Google Scholar
25Lundgaard, U.Målning av luftforureningen med kviksilvdampe på en tandklinik. Tandlaegebladet, 1981, 85, 86–88.Google Scholar
26Mjör, I. A., Eriksen, H. M., Haugen, E., & Skogedal, O.Biologic assessment of Cu-containing amalgams. International Dental Journal, 1977, 27, 333–40.Google Scholar
27Mjör, I. A.The safe and effective use of dental amalgam. International Dental Journal, 1987, 37, 147–51.Google ScholarPubMed
28Nakayama, H., Niki, F.5 Shono, M., & Hada, S.Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatology, 1983, 9, 411–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Nilner, K.Studies of electrochemical action in the oral cavity. Swedish Dental Journal, 1981, 5, 1–42.Google Scholar
30Nilsson, B., & Nilsson, B.Mercury in dental practice.Swedish Dental Journal, 1986a, 10, 1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
31Nilsson, B., & Nilsson, B.Mercury in dental practice. III.Urinary mercury excretion in dental personnel. Swedish Dental Journal, 1986b, 10, 221–32.Google Scholar
32Nixon, G. S., Whittle, C. A., & Woodfin, A.Mercury levels in dental surgeries and dental personnel. British Dental Journal, 1981,151, 149–54.Google Scholar
33Olstad, M. L., Holland, R. I., Wandel, N., & Hensten-Pettersen, A.Correlation between amalgam restorations and mercury concentration in urine. Journal of Dental Research, 1987, 66, 1179–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Patterson, J. E., Weissberg, B. G., & Dennison, P. J.Mercury in human breath from dental amalgams. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1985, 34, 459–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Ring, M. E.Dentistry. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1985, 1–319.Google ScholarPubMed
36Mercury, Schütz A.. In Borgström, B., Nordén, Å., Åkesson, B., Abdulla, M., & Jägerstad, M. (eds.), Nutrition and old age. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1979, 14, 223–31.Google Scholar
37Shoji, A., & Sugai, T.Two cases of hypersensitivity to mercury. Japanese Journal of Dermatology, 1975, 85, 167.Google Scholar
38Skerfving, S. “Normal” concentrations of mercury in human tissue and urine. In Friberg, L. & Vostal, J. (eds.), Mercury in the environment. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press, 1972, 109–12.Google Scholar
39Skerfving, S.Methylmercury exposure, mercury levels in blood and hair, and health status in Swedes consuming contaminated fish. Toxicology, 1974, 2, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Smith, R. G., Vorwald, A. J., Patil, L. S., & Mooney, T. F.Effects of exposure to mercury in the manufacture of chlorine. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1970, 31, 687–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Socialstyrelsen. Kvicksilver/amalgam hälsorisker, Stockholm, 1987, 1–159.Google Scholar
42Strubelt, O., Schiel, R., & Estler, C.-J. Zur Frageder Embrytoxizität von Quecksilber aus Amalgamfüllungen. Zahnärztliche Mitteilungen, Deutschen Ärzt-Verlag, Köln, 1988, 1–12.Google Scholar
43Svare, C. W., Peterson, L. C., Reinhardt, J. W. et al. , The effect of dental amalgams on mercury levels in expired air. Journal of Dental Research, 1981, 60, 1668–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Tkkahata, N., Hayashi, H., Watanabe, B., & Anso, T.Accumulation of mercury in the brains of two autopsy cases with chronic inorganic mercurypoisoning. Folia Psych iatrica et Neurologica Japonica, 1970, 24, 59–69.Google Scholar
45Thomason, J., & Russel, J. A.Dermatitis due to mercury following amalgam dental restorations. British Journal of Dermatology, 1970, 82, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Vimy, M. J., & Lorscheider, F. L.Intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. Journal of Dental Research, 1985a, 64, 1069–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Vimy, M. J., & Lorscheider, F. L.Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: Estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. Journal of Dental Research, 1985b, 64, 1073–85.Google ScholarPubMed
48Vostal, J. Transport of mercury in nature and possible routes of exposure. In Friberg, L. & Vostal, J. (eds.), Mercury in the Environment. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press, 1972, 15–28.Google Scholar
49Watanabe, T., Shimada, T., & Endo, A.Effects of mercury compounds on ovulation and meiotic and mitotic chromosomes in female golden hamsters. Teratology, 1982, 25, 381–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Wester, P. O.Trace element balance in relation to calcium intake.Atheroschlerosis, 1974, 20, 207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Westöö, G.Kvicksilver i fisk.—Finns risk för förgiftning? Vår Föda, 1965, 7, 85–88.Google Scholar