Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:31:02.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experience with CAPD as Home Dialysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Norbert H. Lameire
Norbert H. Lameire
Affiliation:
Ghent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For patients who have had the misfortune to develop terminal renal failure, three basic modes of treatment can be offered. One is renal transplantation, with a graft taken from either a living or a cadaveric donor. When successful, it offers the best quality of life and treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, the elderly and those with severe cardiovascular or systemic complications are not always suitable candidates for renal transplantation (1).

Type
Advanced Technology and Health Care in the Home
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 305 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Strom, T. B. & Tilney, N. L., Clinical management of the renal transplant recipient. In Brenner, B. M. & Stein, J. H. (eds.), Chronic renal failure. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.Google Scholar
2.Lazarus, J. M. Hemodialysis in chronic renal failure. In Brenner, B. M. and Stein, J. H. (eds.), Chronic renal failure. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.Google Scholar
3.Nolph, K. D. & Sorkin, M. I. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In Brenner, B. M. & Stein, J. H. (eds.), Chronic renal failure. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.Google Scholar
4.Popovich, R. P., Moncrief, J. W., Nolph, K. D., Ghods, A. J., Twardowski, Z. J., & Pyle, W. K.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1978, 88, 449–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.De Paepe, M. B. J., Schelstraete, K. H. G., Ringoir, S. M. G., & Lameire, N. H.Influence of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on the anemia of endstage renal disease. Kidney International, 1983, 23, 744–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Lameire, N. H., De Paepe, M., & Ringoir, S.Influence of CAPD on blood pressure. In M. Dhaene (ed.) Proceedings of the third Benelux CAPD symposium, 1984, 25–34.Google Scholar
7.Lameire, N. H. & Ringoir, S. An overview of peritonitis and other complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In Legrain, M. (ed.) Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1980, 229–237.Google Scholar
8.Williams, C. C., Cattran, D., Fenton, S. S., Khanna, R., Manuel, A., Saiphoo, C., Oreopoulos, D. G., & Roscoe, J.Peritonitis on CAPD – three years' experience in Toronto. Perit Dialysis Bulletin, 1981, Suppl. I, S7–S10.Google Scholar
9.Lameire, N. A., Dhaene, M., Matthys, E., De Paepe, M., Vereerstraeten, P., Dratwa, M., & Ringoir, S. Experience with CAPD in diabetic patients. In Keen, H. & Legrain, M. (eds.), Prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Boston: MTP Press Ltd., 1983.Google Scholar
10.Schreiber, M. J., & Vidt, D. G.Organizational aspects of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Cleveland Clinical Quarterly, 1981, 48, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Wing, A. J., Broyer, M., Brunner, F. P., Brynger, H., Challah, S., Donckerwolcke, R. A., Gretz, N., Jacobs, C., Kramer, P., & Selwood, N. H.Combined report on regular dialysis and transplantation in Europe. EDTA Proceedings, 1983, 20, 5–71.Google ScholarPubMed
12.De Santo, N. G., Capodicasa, G., & Pluvio, M. Nitrogen balance and growth in children on CAPD. In Gahl, G. M., Kessel, M., & Nolph, K. (eds.), Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1981, 397–404.Google Scholar
13.Pyle, W. K., Hiatt, B. S., Grant, J. E., & Nolph, K. D., NIH CAPD Registry, 1983.Google Scholar
14.Lameire, N. H.Reflections on the status of treatment of endstage renal disease in Belgium. The Renal Family, 1983, 5, 18–22.Google Scholar
15.Friedman, E. A., Feldman, J. N., & Lundin, A. P. IIIContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is not yet proven equal or superior to maintenance hemodialysis. Controversies in Nephrology, 1981, 3, 135–141.Google Scholar
16.Moncrief, J. W.CAPD is not being oversold. Controversies in Nephrology, 1981, 3, 142–147.Google Scholar
17.Simmons, R. G., Anderson, C., & Kamstra, L.Comparison of quality of life of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis and after transplantation. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 1984, 4, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Friedman, E. A.Critical appraisal of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Annual Review of Medicine, 1984, 35, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Comty, C. M.Is CAPD the panacea for chronic renal failure? American Journal of Kidney Disease, 1982, 2, 386–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed